Tbone2 Posted September 13, 2003 Posted September 13, 2003 Look MS has come up with now."Microsoft is hurrying to produce a post Service Pack 1 security rollup package for Windows XP, reversing its August decision to rely solely on Windows Update to deliver individual patches. Since it came to light that Windows XP SP2 was delayed until at least mid-2004, pressure has mounted for Redmond to tend to customers without high bandwidth connections. The incorporates 22 previously released updates and is due to be released to manufacturing on September 24." This is from BetanewsTbone2
Aaron Posted September 13, 2003 Posted September 13, 2003 We will have to wait for the release notes for any information on whether this will be slipstream'able or not.The Windows 2000 SP2 Security Rollup Package has the update.exe file (which is used for slipstreaming), so its possible that the same will apply for XP SP1's Security Rollup Package
creopard Posted September 13, 2003 Posted September 13, 2003 Here is the list of the 22 package names:Q323255_XP_SP1_5478 Q328310 Security Update Windows XP Q329048_XP_5453 Q329115_XP 329170 Security Update Windows XP Q329390_WXP_SP2 Q329441_WXP_SP2_5838 Q329834_XP_5780 331953_WXP_5919 Q810565_XP_SP2 810577_XPSP2_5935 810833_XP_5937 811493_XP_5951_rec 811630: Critical Update (Windows XP) Q814033_XP_SP2_5989 Q815021_XPSP2_winse_44054 Q817287_XP_SP2 817606_XPSP2_winse_43844_critical 821557_WXP_SP2_winse_46728 823559_WXP_winse_48629 823980_XPSP2_winse_48714_critical 824146_XPSP2_WinSE_49652it seems M$ does not make much efforts in releasing this package... just take 823980_XPSP2_winse_48714_critical 824146_XPSP2_WinSE_49652the patch 824146 replaces the patch 823980, since it contains the same files, but with a higher version-number
Aaron Posted September 13, 2003 Posted September 13, 2003 It's not released because its undergoing beta tests to make sure there's nothing wrong.
Spheris Posted September 13, 2003 Posted September 13, 2003 The release will be the 24th to RTW and TRM to OEM Distributors. There will be a slipstreamed ISO for OEMs, there will be no slipstream for the RTW packageBut the RTW will support slip through webmedics method as I have already tried it within that framework last eveningOne catchthis addresses only the "laziness" updates and does not address known hotfix flaws in the OS operation itself. So do not expect any performance related improvements or differences
Paul 365 Posted September 13, 2003 Posted September 13, 2003 In otherwords just a roll up of all the previous fixes into one update without any improvement to those fixes.Sorry for my ignorance but what does RTW and TRM mean?Im glad it can be slipped though....that should keep Webmedic busy
1chaoticadult Posted September 13, 2003 Posted September 13, 2003 RTW = Release To The Web. Don't know what TRM means.
Spheris Posted September 13, 2003 Posted September 13, 2003 TRM, generally the same as RTM but usually used for non public ISO builds (i.e. OEM builders and vendors only)Tactical Release to Manufacturingas in marketing damage control
valkyre Posted September 13, 2003 Posted September 13, 2003 We'll have to see how everything goes once it's released.
Paul 365 Posted September 14, 2003 Posted September 14, 2003 Thats a quite a hard and daring look on things.lets take the blaster problem as an example - it didnt get me because i update when ms tells me to. I took great plesure in laughing at my friends who turned off autoupdates crying about ms and there invasion of privacy.But to use a vehicle as an analgy like you did - If ford sold a car with an airbag that worked perfectly 99.9% of the time (just like the dcom code does) but failed to deploy if an oncoming car hit it at 37.6% going at 38.5 MPH (ie the malformed malicious code) would they recall it and fix it for free.Appoligies for names and spelling but you get the jist of what i am saying.Should i also have to buy an extra seat harness incase the one built into my car fails or should i trust the one my cars manufacturer supplied?
gui_m Posted September 14, 2003 Posted September 14, 2003 Hey i don't know about u guys but i've been making a crap load of $$$ just fixing MSBlast for ppl. thank u M$!
Unwonted Posted September 14, 2003 Posted September 14, 2003 To a reasonable person, Spheris, it makes sense to charge for not using a firewall. It's really not MS' problem when people don't fix it. The outcry from the masses, however, would be deafening. I think they could save money thusly: They could make security patches available from other outlets like download.com and save MS the bandwidth.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now