November 11, 200619 yr Guess Vista RTM surpassed the original goal of a 15-minute setup...http://soapbox.msn.com/video.aspx?vid=c677...a4-48bdb74da4eb
November 11, 200619 yr I don't know what hardware that vid claims to be running on, but I got a dual 3.0Ghz Xeon box with 4Gig of RAM and SATA2 RAID0 that didn't install any where near that fast.I'll have to say that vid clip is (time compressed) BS.
November 11, 200619 yr It appears to me that you can install Vista without a Serial Number (although it warns that there will be problems). Can someone confirm that this is the case? I'd like to know what happens if you continue the installation without a Serial Number.
November 11, 200619 yr It appears to me that you can install Vista without a Serial Number (although it warns that there will be problems). Can someone confirm that this is the case? I'd like to know what happens if you continue the installation without a Serial Number.you will get 14 days to input a key or vista will lock down, and it looks to be time compressed, no version of vista installed that fast, and i haven't heard of any miracle compression that would let them do that
November 11, 200619 yr So, one could "borrow" a Vista Setup Disk and install/run it for 14 days, just to get the feel of it, and check out the various features? And the serial# and activation wouldn't be a problem during that time?
November 11, 200619 yr One word: ramdrive.Maxes out an IDE or SATA interface and nearly zero seek time.
November 11, 200619 yr One word: ramdrive.Maxes out an IDE or SATA interface and nearly zero seek time.Indeed.But transfer rates should also be too high: you have to write 8GB on your HD. Let's say you do this at 50MB/s and you still need 2 minutes 40 seconds.That's the whole video length! File copy did not take so long, Vista Ultimate is maybe bigger than 8GB, I'd like to write continuously at 50MB/s when playing with 10 000 files.And what about the DVD read speed ?Else they're using a ramdrive plus a network share else the author of this video is nuhi! However I have to agree installation can be shortened by several minutes if you do file copy while you're asking the user for his infos.
November 11, 200619 yr ATA33: 33MB/s (deprecated)ATA66: 66MB/s (deprecated)ATA100: 100MB/sATA133: 133MB/sSATA (1): 150MB/sSATA (2): 300MB/sDDR RAM: 1.6GB/s and above
November 11, 200619 yr That's the theoric connection speed, not the effective write/read speed.(I'm not sure I really got the exact meaning of your post)But anyway, this video is clearly a fake.
November 11, 200619 yr That videos gotta be sped up, I've run the setup on my machine which installs XP in an hour flat, and it takes Vista 2 to 3 hours....Unless build 6000 has really sped up the install process......Just occured to me it's possible this guy was running a setup either off a hard drive or over a network share...... Edited November 11, 200619 yr by Nakatomi2010
November 11, 200619 yr The video is not a fake, its an actual install....but...parts of the video are time compressed to make things look faster then they really are. If you watch the whole thing, at the end you will see the statement "This screencast shows you the process involved in installing Windows". Its just to show the process and some parts were time compressed to move the video along.Nakatomi2010: It takes you 2 to 3 hours to install Vista? WoW! The longest its taken me with some builds was 27 minutes flat, RC2 build 5744 installs in 22 minutes for me.That videos gotta be sped up, I've run the setup on my machine which installs XP in an hour flat, and it takes Vista 2 to 3 hours....Unless build 6000 has really sped up the install process......Just occured to me it's possible this guy was running a setup either off a hard drive or over a network share...... Edited November 11, 200619 yr by Spooky
November 11, 200619 yr If you watch the whole thing, at the end you will see the statement "This screencast shows you the process involved in installing Windows". Its just to show the process and some parts were time compressed to move the video along. ...Thanks for pointing out I forgot to catch the ending... Yes the Vista install is much more streamlined than its predecessors and should be far less daunting for the average Joe users that run it.Hell, it's almost too easy.
November 11, 200619 yr Author And someone try highlighting that blank space underneath my first post...
Create an account or sign in to comment