oneless Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 1.win98 do not run .cmd files .how do you manage this ? on those systems.i run today my wpi_cd_4.38 on an older sistem.wpi.cmd do not run and so on... i use .cmd files.2.i ask this because , related is next question :how do you manage the two new entriesexecute before and after ?i have before and after more than 2 tasks .my first ideea was to use a .cmd file !? .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadicq Posted June 6, 2006 Share Posted June 6, 2006 Did you try changing their extension into .bat?Just try it because I know autoexec.bat was working ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oneless Posted June 6, 2006 Author Share Posted June 6, 2006 felicitari pentru promovare . (ours local football teams gets both promotions to first league)i know .bat files 100% will work on w98.but , what i dont know is if ALL my commands inside my .cmd files will work (especially regs commands ?...).bat files are 100% compatible with .cmd files ?this really i dont know... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadicq Posted June 7, 2006 Share Posted June 7, 2006 (edited) Offtopic: Multumesc si felicitari de asemenea.Ontopic:yes, .cmd is completly compatible with .batTry this on any windows system:assoc .cmdYou get "cmdfile"Thenftype cmdfileYou get cmdfile="%1" %*For batassoc .batYou get batfileThenftype batfileYou get batfile="%1" %*So they really are the same thing (actually bat files are more often used because they offer backwark compatibility.All normal cmd commands will work on windows 98 (copy, rd, del etc)But about the reg commands:regedit.exe will accept the same parameters with the XP one."regedit /S bla.reg" will work.However, I don't know for sure if reg.exe was included in the vanilla version of Win98.I think it was bundled with some resource kit, so try using regedit /s or put a reg.exe on your ua cd just to be sure. Edited June 7, 2006 by sadicq Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dumpy Dooby Posted June 7, 2006 Share Posted June 7, 2006 The Win98 version of command.com is very limited. It doesn't support nearly as many options as the WinXP flavor. I'm not sure what your wpi.cmd file looks like, but there is a chance that you will have problems if the code is too complex. There's far too many differences to be able to go over all of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkh Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 hellorename the command.com as cmd.com and put it in the same directory of wpi.good chance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oneless Posted June 9, 2006 Author Share Posted June 9, 2006 hellorename the command.com as cmd.com and put it in the same directory of wpi.good chance sorry , can you elaborate ... ? for us ... what is in your mind ?!... good chance !for...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dumpy Dooby Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 There is no need to do any renaming. That won't make command.com behave in a different manner. That's a silly notion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkh Posted June 11, 2006 Share Posted June 11, 2006 helloI want to say: copy command.com from your sytem drive windows 98 to the directory wpi where is wpi.hta then remae it as cmd.com and try it. it work for me under windows 98 frbye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now