Swimming_Bird Posted March 5, 2006 Posted March 5, 2006 .cmd files for this purpose are extremely inefficient. I was just wondering if there was some advantage to running it with a cmd file as opposed to many of the other options out there.
Dumpy Dooby Posted March 6, 2006 Posted March 6, 2006 Do you care to elaborate on the inefficiency of cmd files?You're affirming a claim, not backing it up, and then requesting your opposition to affirm and provide evidence for their side. Dunno if this is supposed to be a debate ... your tone just made it seem like that. Anyway, I use a cmd file because I consolidate all of my scripts. I suppose I could run an exe of some sort from the cmd, but cmds seem to work. And I haven't noticed any ineffiencies with 'em.
Lost Soul Posted March 6, 2006 Posted March 6, 2006 id have to agree with dooby, cmd's seem to work fine and i have no ideal why they could be a draw back ,, they are easy to configure and set up with simple batch scripting ,,Swimming_Bird could you pls enlighten us this, id like to know your thoughts and reasons,, im not in this to debate just further my learnings, so i welcome all thoughts and beliefs btw: soon probably in the next release the cmd will become obsolete due to the integration of ktools , i believe with in the exe file it self it will call out and run all the programs that the cmd does at the moment.--------but in a way i could see your thoughts about having the autorun.inf call out to a exe when all exe's are basically standalones, instead of useing a cmd,, which actually is a dependent
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now