Jump to content

Recommended Posts


Posted
If you have a DirectX7 based card (e.g. GeForce2, Radeon 7500) then I strongly advise you not to download this benchmark as many DX7 card owners will get a tad upset when they finally get that 181MB file downloaded, installed, and then they are able to run only 1 game test and a fraction of the feature tests. -
Posted
If you have a DirectX7 based card (e.g. GeForce2, Radeon 7500) then I strongly advise you not to download this benchmark as many DX7 card owners will get a tad upset when they finally get that 181MB file downloaded, installed, and then they are able to run only 1 game test and a fraction of the feature tests. -

bah

/me orders Radeon 9900 (heh)

Posted

That was just a quote from a download site. I don't even know that d7 is. I have the crappiest card on the planet - riva tnt m64 - I know it won't do me any good to test - other than get a laugh out of it.

Posted

1214 3D marks.

like sedative i got a poxy 5fps in many of the tests.

my system seriously needs defragging and formatting tho, i still have some stuff installed from when i had a Radeon 8500 card in here.

1214 is a shock, i would get near 10,000 in 3dmark 2001 !! :)

Cant post compare url, future marks site is swamped still so i couldnt submit it.

Posted

ok tweeked some settings, dropped my desktop res down to 1024X768

(same as Sedatives and r4g3d - why so low a res guys?)

new score?? much beter! :) 1503 marks.

marks.jpg

Posted

it shouldnt hurt your eyes, just give you more desktop space! my monitors 17" too :/

ROFL@Lynch... that was worth the 177mb download wasnt it? :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...