Windows 11 , The Worst Crap Ever

[pcalvert]

On 2/15/2024 at 9:56 AM, Tripredacus said:

I'm still suprised no one has attempted to make shell replacements. Even like a launcher-type thing that could be customized.

 

They have. There's an "ancient" one called xoblite. It's kind of like using fluxbox on Windows instead of Linux. Check out the screenshots and you'll see what I mean.

xoblite™ / Blackbox for Windows

Edited July 12 by pcalvert

[user57]

in the past we either where called dump, its just not doing that, it would be found, its not a problem, you still can block it with a firewall (no windows has a firewall + software that can do anything at higher software levels - and its hardware supported so software dont have a chance (you dont see it when the hardware is doing that instead of the software))

it might be a good idea to come up with it now again after all these years:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RutDZMCjkMs

and today:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1eX_vvAlUc

i think it was to shortsighted to always not understand that things like "there could be a pedophile, there could be a terrorist" is like we always said not the real thing that is intended - it is a gate-opener or a backdoor behind held open

sure if you hang up a camera in everybody´s home - at some point you will find a pedophile and a terrorist

but its not the main goal

the main goal is that company´s get the private data - things like if you dont work enough - or what they can change in your life (gathering that info) (there such things already also in external things like a email-provider (gmx.net for example providers owners of workers insight in their mails))

after that a lawers apears that says something like "i know everything better then you, and we have the right to do so" or something like that - and then talks something about terms of use maybe eula (or whatsoever the names are)

- if it dont stands there now - no problem we write it step by step a little closer with every terms of use upgrade - lawers provide the neccesary support, maybe influencers, maybe politicans 

but the big deal is that the word company is involved (what says us what this is really about)

and i think here is the catch - company dont have the right what the police got - and never should 

for me thats the main thing (company) that needs to be removed - if something is even doing like that it has to be the police - and never a company ! never

if the law is really against us there should be new laws being made that exactly write out the company of these things 

sometimes they also write something like "but amazon safes that data for the police" or "its property of amazon/company" its not its like a speech on a phone or a packet in a shipping station 

just because you have it you dont own it (a letter, a packet or spoken message are such examples)  - period

that needs a better clarification in the law itself - and if somebody is doing that only the police is allowed to - company has nothing to search here

and the people that support things like that or mixing it together (like the amazon example) should be clearly identified what they really are - they are the company´s interests - and if a policeman/politician/whatever helps these people, they are helping them for a fraud/crime and so on...

as zuckerberg diplomatic once said : facebook ends where the law ends...

but by censoring speech (freedom of speech) zuckerberg is going against constitutional law - and zuckerberg/or facebook are not above the law

in my opinion zuckerberg did exactly that by censoring certain (and legal spoken things) (so he said exactly that in hope that they dont get the trick - also the lawers could said this to him to say so)

zuckerberg certainly dont have ""domiciliary rights" of facebook" to forbid the higher law - there domiciliary rights cant outnorm freedom of speech or legalize false law´s

it dont necessary has to be freedom of speech that would include many other laws including the one to spy certain people, prohibits other company´s interests or stealing data ect.

that´s why we need better law´s against company´s doing such things

Edited 2 hours ago by user57