Jump to content

Recommended Posts


Posted
2 hours ago, SweetLow said:

Two solution exist - or make driver (.SYS version) and run it before EMM386 or make DPMI version of CREGFIX.

P.S. http://sweetlow.orgfree.com/download/cregfix.zip

.SYS version for test

Checked it out. If you run this CREGFIX.SYS after EMM386.EXE in CONFIG.SYS - the above error occurs. But if you put it BEFORE it, there is no such error.

Posted
50 minutes ago, MERCURY127 said:

why dont make combo version as one exe file?

 

2 hours ago, SweetLow said:

version for test

N.B. And probably you can just do such version youself if you need it: COPY /B CREGFIX.EXE+CREGFIX.SYS CREGFIX.EXE, isn't it?

Posted
15 minutes ago, SweetLow said:

It is only half of test. Do Windows load successfully after that?

On the current hardware (Without VCACHE error) - loaded successfully. For reliability, it would be necessary to check this on the problem hardware (Which is subject to this error), but I don't have it at hand at the moment.

Posted
55 minutes ago, SweetLow said:

And why did you ask solution without having problem?

I'm focusing on choosing the right hardware for the new configuration, and I came to ask if there is a solution to this problem. The choice depends on it. If there is a solution, then it will be one piece of hardware (later). And if there is no solution, then it will be a completely different hardware (earlier). Such things you want to know in advance, so as not to make a mistake and make the right choice.

Posted
1 hour ago, SweetLow said:

COPY /B CREGFIX.EXE+CREGFIX.SYS CREGFIX.EXE, isn't it?

no, no, no! hybrid sys+exe is not just concatenation.
when loading exe file via DEVICE= command, DOS wiill skip exe header only, not all body of exe file.
u need rewrite source for it.

Posted
1 hour ago, defuser said:

and make the right choice

It is good logic, but this problem now is minor for systems with this bug.

1 hour ago, MERCURY127 said:

u need rewrite source for it.

Ok, but i think it is not so simple for DPMI executables at all.

Posted
19 hours ago, MERCURY127 said:

why even use dpmi for such simple app?

I assume just because it is relatively easy way to deal with PM environment.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...