Sampei.Nihira Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 (edited) https://www.cloudflare.com/ssl/encrypted-sni/ Edited January 3, 2019 by Sampei.Nihira Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathwiz Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 Looks like it will be a while before browsers supporting encrypted SNI come to the XP platform: Quote On the browser side, our friends at Firefox tell us that they expect to add encrypted SNI support [the week of Sept. 24, 2018] to Firefox Nightly (keep in mind that the encrypted SNI spec is still under development, so it’s not stable just yet). If it's not even in the release builds of FF yet, I doubt we'll see it ported to Basilisk/Pale Moon (and thence to @roytam1's Serpent/New Moon) anytime soon. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sampei.Nihira Posted January 4, 2019 Author Share Posted January 4, 2019 (edited) https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=21172 Edited January 4, 2019 by Sampei.Nihira Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dencorso Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=19826&p=147080#p147080 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathwiz Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 Personally, I'd like to see it, albeit as an "opt-in" option where I could select my own DNS servers rather than Mozilla or whoever selecting them for me. The idea is to try to get ESNI and DoH/DoT as common as HTTPS has become. But it's pretty clear from the two threads linked above that MC isn't interested. My only hope is that @roytam1 can merge the relevant commits directly from Mozilla's code. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roytam1 Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 (edited) 11 hours ago, Mathwiz said: Personally, I'd like to see it, albeit as an "opt-in" option where I could select my own DNS servers rather than Mozilla or whoever selecting them for me. The idea is to try to get ESNI and DoH/DoT as common as HTTPS has become. But it's pretty clear from the two threads linked above that MC isn't interested. My only hope is that @roytam1 can merge the relevant commits directly from Mozilla's code. this requires lots of changes in necko component(mozilla's networking component) since the difference is huge between 52esr and trunk for merging TRR and ESNI. Edited January 5, 2019 by roytam1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathwiz Posted January 5, 2019 Share Posted January 5, 2019 At this point it's premature to do anything more than preliminary research anyhow. The ESNI spec isn't even finalized yet. My hope is, if Mozilla adopts the changes, Google will follow; if that happens it'll be a lot tougher for MC to resist. But that's probably years down the road; by that time we'll be fighting to keep even Win 7 alive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sampei.Nihira Posted January 6, 2019 Author Share Posted January 6, 2019 Interesting this extension: Escape http://madynes.loria.fr/Research/Software#toc2 It does not seem compatible with New Moon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathwiz Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 It does install in (official) Basilisk, so I'm guessing probably Web Extension format. I'll try it in @roytam1's Serpent tomorrow; it'll probably work there as well. No documentation though; no idea how to set it up or use it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now