burd Posted June 28, 2017 Posted June 28, 2017 On 6/22/2017 at 0:55 PM, Dibya said: NT4 is perfect beast but unfortunately my pc drivers are not available. 2000 worked great with Bwc and wild bill stuff but many xp compatible apps never worked. Do not say me about nt6.x. They are nothing but bloated piggy NT 6.1+* Win7 Win8 Win8.1 Win10(Junk)
Dibya Posted June 28, 2017 Author Posted June 28, 2017 4 minutes ago, burd said: NT 6.1+* Win7 Win8 Win8.1 Win10(Junk) Okay vista is fast in modern system but it is not as fast as xp . At least far better than 7
burd Posted June 28, 2017 Posted June 28, 2017 (edited) 1 minute ago, Dibya said: Okay vista is fast in modern system but it is not as fast as xp . At least far better than 7 my vista that has a hard drive boots faster than 7 on ssd its quite funny actually SSD isnt even occupied much LoL Edited June 28, 2017 by burd
Dibya Posted June 28, 2017 Author Posted June 28, 2017 Just now, burd said: my vista that has a hard drive boots faster than 7 on ssd its quite funny actually SSD isnt even occupied much LoL 7 is just a crap nothing else
burd Posted June 28, 2017 Posted June 28, 2017 (edited) Just now, Dibya said: 7 is just a crap nothing else Yes,its the biggest scam of 2009/10 fooling people into buying crap Windows 2000,XP and Vista are Quite Stable compared to it. Edited June 28, 2017 by burd
Dibya Posted June 28, 2017 Author Posted June 28, 2017 (edited) 14 minutes ago, burd said: Yes,its the biggest scam of 2009/10 fooling people into buying crap Windows 2000,XP and Vista are Quite Stable compared to it. Still people say it best for unknown reasons. Just silly fan boys . It is unstable unreliable what not to say . When back in 2013 I bought a new desktop with i3 8gb ram with original windows 7 pro when I found that shinny new pc booting slower than p4 style xeon in my room with xp . I just got angry . 7 has some wonderfull features * crashing maya 3dmax visual studio in middle of work . * crashing creative suit * taking long time to print over network * crashing cs go in multiplayer * what more getting some nasty bsod Edited June 28, 2017 by Dibya
burd Posted June 28, 2017 Posted June 28, 2017 Just now, Dibya said: Still people say it best for unknown reasons. Just silly fan boys . It is unstable unreliable what not to say . When back in 2013 I bought a new desktop with i3 8gb ram with original windows 7 pro when I found that shinny new pc booting slower than p4 style xeon in my room with xp . I just got angry . Agreed,Windows XP Best O/S ever followed by Vista,Im not just a vista fan boy,im speaking facts.
Dibya Posted June 28, 2017 Author Posted June 28, 2017 1 minute ago, burd said: Agreed,Windows XP Best O/S ever followed by Vista,Im not just a vista fan boy,im speaking facts. More over I believe 2K I slightly faster than xp but in modern hardware xp outshine 2K but that's ms fault not providing 2K multicore support . 2K is best for businesses but xp added all needed by a home user in shinny ui with cutting edge simplicity. Even people say bad of xp x64 but it is robust and highly stable also very fast . I can say xp x64 professional is rival of Linux being based on 2k3 server .
burd Posted June 28, 2017 Posted June 28, 2017 2 minutes ago, Dibya said: More over I believe 2K I slightly faster than xp but in modern hardware xp outshine 2K but that's ms fault not providing 2K multicore support . 2K is best for businesses but xp added all needed by a home user in shinny ui with cutting edge simplicity. Even people say bad of xp x64 but it is robust and highly stable also very fast . I can say xp x64 professional is rival of Linux being based on 2k3 server . Yes,i can confirm this,i Had XP x64 SP2 in 2015 its super fast but many programs that support XP SP3 x86 dont support XP x64
jaclaz Posted June 28, 2017 Posted June 28, 2017 Hey peeps, do we really need yet another burst of posts on this matter? And Dybia, you know how I appreciate your enthusiasm :), and believe me, I have a lot of sympathy for young people and for there eagerness to learn, their sometimes brilliant ideas, etc, but you shouldn't really make statements like "When back in 2013 I bought a new desktop" or however pose yourself as a long time professional user of any OS that was ever run in the world (unless you actually are one of those). How old were you in 2013? jaclaz
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now