ROTS Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 I understand that various operating systems; however so far we have hadWindows VistaWindows 7Windows 8and soon to be Windows 9 etc etc etcWhile their are SP packs and upgrades to these OSes. They are all NT6.0With XP, 2000, and previous NT operating systems. They seems to have different subsets. That takes a major fix ( meaning no ordinary non-literate user can make the changes ) to make these OSes up to par with each other. Otherwise I would dump theseinto an NT5.0. Of course these are not the same ( at least from my experience ).When somebody makes a topic in the NT6.0 section they have to indicate Vista, Win8, Win9, etc inside of the topic itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
submix8c Posted August 4, 2014 Share Posted August 4, 2014 No, they are -not- all NT6.0! The following link as lots of errors, but the chart is accurate.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_NTSorry, but you are mistaken. NT4 has several variations. As does 2000 as does Server 2003, so they got lumped together since they a "business oriented". XP is not (consumer oriented), so it has its own niche. The method of separation appears to be consistent with all the other OS's in the Forum, e.g NT6.x Servers are separate from the Vista/Win7/Win8 (consumer OS). IOW, all Consumer OS are separate (except 9x/ME) and Business OS are "lumped" after a fashion. HTH - and think about it based on the chart. It actually makes sense. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tripredacus Posted August 5, 2014 Share Posted August 5, 2014 I also disagree. The current layout is fine as it is. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now