Kelsenellenelvian Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 I think that he picked apart a update and looked inside the inf files.Thos numbers are a GUID. It is a randomly determined number. In this case however MS generated guid for that fix and uses it in the hotfixes\files registry entry.DO NOT CHANGE IT! Lots of areas point to that location!!! It's how windows cross references files.Better you ask this? -X- "How do I add customized files to an update?"Just in case = IF you are asking how to add a cracked legitcheckcontroll.dll PLEASE DO NOT POST AGAIN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 That add-on is not mine. It's xable's. I've never even looked at it much. I just use it cause it works. You need to ask at his website of you want to modify it. ; /*----------------------------------*\; | Windows Update Engine Addon Pack |; | By xable |; +------------------------------------+; | http://xable.net/ |; \*----------------------------------*/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aliceinchains Posted January 20, 2011 Share Posted January 20, 2011 I think that he picked apart a update and looked inside the inf files.Thos numbers are a GUID. It is a randomly determined number. In this case however MS generated guid for that fix and uses it in the hotfixes\files registry entry.DO NOT CHANGE IT! Lots of areas point to that location!!! It's how windows cross references files.Better you ask this? -X- "How do I add customized files to an update?"Just in case = IF you are asking how to add a cracked legitcheckcontroll.dll PLEASE DO NOT POST AGAIN No, I'm not trying to used any cracked software, I am goofing around trying to figure out how to build the updates because I don't like installing dll's from someone else... I like xable's update pack and have been enjoying trying to figure out how to build the updates he did. But thank you for the information. I thought -X- was xable.. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jirka (George) Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 PS You need to do everything in one go. Running nLite more than once on a source can cause problems. This does not apply to service packs.Does this apply to updates? I mean, if I integrate updates and hotfixes, nlite say some of them can be integrated normally (via /integrate: switch) and i select "no" and next run some of them can be integrated directly, because previously some KBs add files/functions which these KBs can now update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 26, 2011 Share Posted April 26, 2011 Yes, it applies to updates because it's just a general rule. Having said that, I don't really see it causing a problem. Some here may disagree. You can try it and let us know the outcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Octopuss Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 On the subject of updates and problems: does anyone know what's the deal with nLite telling me that1) certain update cannotbe integrated and whether I want to try the regular method (like I know what the non-regular one is)2) a file in an update is older than the one present in the source? Like wtf, how can a file in the source data older than that in an update released several years after that? Something stinks about build numbers here, because there were at least 3-4 updates where the files to be integrated had build number like (random example) 2350 and the source is 2600 (which is the SP3 build number afaik). In such case I have no idea whether to keep the allegedly newer file... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 (edited) Compare your updates against my list (http://xdot.tk/updates.html) or attach your last session.ini and I'll have a look at it. Edited April 27, 2011 by -X- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Octopuss Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 I am using this list: http://www.vorck.com/windows/hotfixes_xp.htmlThese updates told me the line about not being able to integrate directly (file not present in the ISO or what):943729969878898461941569942288955704971513979687982316244368525082722524375And these babbled some nonsenses about file versions in iso being newer than those in the updates:2360937 - sprv0405.dll in the ISO: 5.1.2600.6031, in the update: 5.1.2600.60222509553 - tcpip6.dll 5.1.2600.5935 vs .5625 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrofLuigi Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 (edited) 1) Those updates contain files that are not present in the installation source. Regular method is when nLite replaces the files directly in the source. But because these files aren't referenced in any .inf's, they would not be copied over at installation time. Nlite doesn't know what to do with them and where are they supposed to go, so safest bet is to copy the whole installer (KBXXXXXXX.exe) and start it at installation time. That is the non-regular method.2) Just click YES every time nLite asks you if you want to keep the newer file. This is a consequence of how Microsoft creates the updates. They are mostly cumulative (higher version number of a file contains the fixes of the previous versions), so you'd always want to have the file with the highest version numbers. Of course, there are exceptions to this rule, but for the public updates they can be overlooked.Also, one file can be replaced by two KBXXXXXXX's, or two KBXXXXXXX's replace few files but one doesn't contain one file (so that's why this KBXXXXXXX is kept, because of that one file), so that's where differences (and nLite's questions) come from. When integration of one KBXXXXXXX.exe is finished, the files are part of the source from then on.GL Edited April 28, 2011 by GrofLuigi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Octopuss Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 The thing about version is that the source is SP3, which is which year? The updates in question are from say 2008 or much later. There is no way in hell those files would be older version than those on the cd. That is impossible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jirka (George) Posted June 10, 2011 Share Posted June 10, 2011 (edited) Is there any way of direct integration of all these KBs? Edited June 10, 2011 by Jirka (George) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now