Windows 95/98(SE)/2000/XP users opinion of...

[submix8c]

go here -

which os - funnyfarm

(woohoo! finally figgered out how "insert topic link" works - DUH!)

FWIW, IBM does the same krap for their "mainframe" OS's, so nothing new here...

Yeah, started at DOS, stopped at W2K3, since my hardware is older. Any MS opsys higher than that would be just plain ignert for me to install...

[Thunderbolt 2864]

I had Windows Vista, but I got rid of it because it drove me made, because it was a memory eater which really bothered me. I hated it how it takes forever just to open certain programs, files and folders, and copying files was a pain in the a** as well. Well, hopefully SP1 will increase and improve performance.

Seriously, if I had to choose to use Windows ME or Vista, I think I'll go for ME. It was less annoying.

[anonymous_user]

I dislike that Vista has such high requirements and yet it gives no "Wow".

Maybe Ill give it another try when I get a new computer and maybe with some later version of vLite.

[Tripredacus]

I don't have it at home because my computer isn't good enough for it, well it probably is but I don't need it right now.

I chose that I use it at work, but I don't use it on my work computer. My work computer is Server 2003 Standard and it does have Vista Business on VPC 07 but I don't use it like that. I install it alot on computers that we sell to businesses but that's about it.

[awergh]

dont like vista much, id definiatly put it to a 9gb install and that it needs a services tab in task manager and processes tab showing how much of a ram hog it, particularly since i ran it on 320mb ram