zedox

What logon screen have you been left with? Blue or Darkside? Also... did you uninstall XPize Darkside BEFORE XPize?

would you mind uninstalling xpize darkside, and then test safemode. Please let me know how you get on.

With the new version: You won't need to have XPize installed. And I would thoroughly recommend uninstalling it before installing XPize Darkside.

My bad, I thought you was using the scroller boot screen and patching the ntoskrnl file!

Not sure how you could be having difficulties? It's a simple executable installer... that looks and works exactly the same way the XPize installer does! @papashex No not the boot screen... need you to test it without the LOGIN screen ta!

Just out of interest can you try uninstaller xpize darkside... does the issue still occur? Also, if it doesn't could you try reinstalling but de-select the logon screen. Cheers

Nope sorry, not till the next release.

The next release WILL be stand-alone and the reloader problem will no longer occur.

I can provide you with my method of bootscreen patching so it doesn't require two restarts...

The next release will be available very soon. Will be independent of XPize and have all the features that XPize has...

XPize Darkside 1.0 XPize Darkside replaces the blue wizards, visual style, logon screen, boot screen and numerous other resources that XPize 4.6 modifies. Known Issues: - Reloader's between XPize and XPize Darkside compete. Please give feedback on any issues you comes across. Important Notes: - Installer: You must install XPize 4.6 before XPize Darkside. - Uninstaller: You must uninstall XPize Darkside before XPize 4.6. Screenshots: Disclaimer: - I am not accountable for any problems/issues using XPize Darkside or its previous relatives may cause your system, the only way any issues would occur is through user misuse, and if you are unaware of how to use this release correctly you should consult these forums for advice. Changelog: Source: Primary Mirror (MediaFire) Download Mirrors: Primary Mirror (thanks Kelsenellenelvian) Secondary Mirror (thanks zxian)

by running the XPize uninstaller, and selecting it.

hmm, yea i thought this pack was meant to make 2000 look and feel like XP? If so the bootscreen posted by nateklomp looks ace1!

Reloader that XPize uses will be included in the next release. The Server Family image will be removed for the next release. A Winntbbu.dll (setup screen) will be included in the next release. Will touch up the logo for the next release. Nope that file isnt, will add support for ntkrnlmp.exe for the next release. Ok, I'm going to remove the Server Family image. Also, not sure what you mean about "You should give me the ability to get the modified" ? Sorry no other switches in this version, but the next release will have a variety of switches.

Thanks!

Thanks Steam_Trout, I was aware that the reloader may have problems like this but was unsure how to get them working together. The next release will be independent of XPize, and thus the reloader problem will be fixed.

This can't be slipstreamed yet.I would advice slipstreaming XPize, and then installing XPize Darkside. A Future release will support slipstreaming, and will no longer be classed an "add-on". Would be greatful if you could point out which backgrounds look pixelated... You are correct, that is how I created the black backgrounds. I have done... just download XPize Darkside

Worked! thanks

Sorry, I meant your local setings folder in your user profile.

You have my permission to use both my logon screens. Thanks for asking!

nothing in either TEMP folders when installing flash...

I know my title is a bit unclear... If I go on a webpage that requires Flash i get the normal message.... "You need flash bla bla bla..." I go to the adobe flash site, install it... it comes up "Flash player installed succesfully" Go back to the site and it still says i need flash...

Would like to double click a vbs script that is on a network drive without the security prompt coming up... ie: just opens the file outright. Any ideas?

I use the XPize Installer, which seems to work fine, I havn't had any complaints that it hasn't yet. You should make your posts a bit clearer... the original didn't really explain what you wanted!

O, what I mean't was... what was the point of creating this topic? I've already got a method of applying the bootscreen, which seems to work well enough.