Jump to content

awkduck

Member
  • Posts

    424
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    United States

Posts posted by awkduck

  1. I've had a "Pentium I" (133Mhz) and two "Pentium II" (450Mhz) Thinkpads. The Pentium II laptops had NeoMagic audio/video (no 3D) and fans. You could install 512Mb of ram, 47*Mb could be seen (472?). The firmware update didn't fix that. They didn't have Ethernet.

    The "Pentium I" had NeoMagic video and I believe Crystal Semiconductor audio (some SoundBlaster support), and no fan. I had over 64Mb of ram, in it. But I doubt it supported up to 512Mb. It also did not have Ethernet.

    You might be able to find a "Pentium II" Thinkpad without a fan. Could be harder to find one that has 3D and no fan, but possible(?). Some 3D chips, back then, didn't even have heatsinks.

    The issue with Thinkpads, is that they have a large "Fan Club". It can be harder to find the really nice ones. I very much like the S series (30/31). The R and A series are okay too. The I1400/I1500 are also kinda neat.

  2. 1 hour ago, sonyu said:

    So it doesn't have a fan?

    No fan. They are sometimes used in the desert. You cannot have sand blowing into the fan vent. Many models are said to survive being dropped into water, by design. The harddrive caddie, and the rest of the system, are designed to resist moderate impact.

    They have some office models, they have fans. But you can tell by the simple appearance, that it those are not "rugged" laptops.

    I've had the CF-29 and Cf-18. No fans. I bought a "non-functional" CF-28. I gutted it, to use the shell, for a custom "Banana Pi" laptop build. It had no fan.

  3. 5 minutes ago, sonyu said:

     

    I think I just need to try different VIA HyperionPro drivers versions and maybe a Kernel Ex or as much updates as I can on W98 or WME to get the gpu working

    cause the comment of the HP user in vogons isn't bad at all.. I think there is an option to get it working... 

    Then you could let us know how to do it :) It is always interesting to see peoples experience, with machines I don't own.

  4. The best match, I have seen, Is the Panasonic ToughBook CF-28. There are different models, some fall under the aim. It is also not as nice looking, compared to some of the others. You can get a Display with 1024x768 (touchscreen only has 800x600) Intel 830MG (up to 32Mb), CPU Pentium-M (maybe III) @ 1Ghz-800Mhz, AC97 audio, Maximum memory of 512Mb, Up to 10hrs (with two batteries, 4hrs with one), 2 PCMCIA slots, but I can't tell for certain if it is USB 1.1 or 2. I'm guessing, if Pentium-M, it would be USB2. A 800Mhz Pentium III, might have USB1.1.

    If it was USB1.1, a PCMCIA card would fix that. But I have bough some PCMCIA, cards that don't always work reliably.

    The issue with a ToughBook, is getting one in good shape and including the harddrive caddie. A nice one can sometimes be too expensive. These machines have been used by the Construction, Police, and Military. Some of the used ones are a bit worn.

    Being a nitpicker, I often dislike Laptops with on-board memory. If that memory goes bad, you are stuck with it; unless you are skilled in circuit board repair. The Toughbook has 256Mb on-board with a slot for 256Mb expansion.

    Note: I don't know how well the Intel 830MG performs, with 3D. I'm just assuming, that with up to 32Mb of unified memory, it does fine.

  5. 8 hours ago, MrMateczko said:

    Why not just unplug the fan and underclock the CPU? (might require modding BIOS to avoid CPU fan error if it causes a system halt)

    You can use CrystalCPUID on 9x for this and there's plenty of software for DOS to slow down the CPU in it.

    My ThinkPad T42p has Intel 855PM chipset and it seems to be the latest one from Intel that is fully officially supported under 98.

    I should get motivated and test some of this.

    Sonyu is aiming at 1Ghz, for the lowest speed. That makes it a little harder. But, the VIA laptop, near the beginning of the debate, likely performs near or less than a PIII 650-850Mhz mobile CPU. So that might be something for Sonyu to consider. But, using a 1.4Ghz as an example, throttling down to 800Mhz may still require a fan. If you could get a higher speed CPU down to 800-ish, it might work. I do wonder what a better Heat sink might do.

    Your suggestion of the Intel GPU is probably the right path. Nvidia and ATI/Radeon GPUs will probably get much hotter. S3, Via, and Intel would be better.

  6. FantasyAcquiesce, probably has done what I have done, a time or two. It is easy to duplicate.

    First you install Vbemp, then you install whatever Win2k+ driver has a matching hardware vendor and device identification, and finally you reboot with your new driver.

    But you are not using the Win2k+ driver. You are using Vbemp. The registry changed the name of your device, to match the Win2k+ driver. But if you go to "Device Manager" > properties on the video device in "Display Adapters" > "Driver" tab > "Driver File Details", you will find the the Vbemp driver files are still listed.

    FantasyAcquiesce has even said, in that thread:

    Quote

    I tried to run House of the Dead 2 and only got glitchy polygons...I guess this driver is no better than the VEMP one...

    The Intel video driver from RetroSystemRevival will not work. In fact, if you don't install Vbemp first, you'll end up with the default (16 color 640x480).

    I will gladly eat my words, if wrong. The only way to have evidence, the driver works, is to have a screenshot of the "Driver File Details".

    But I've installed drivers from 2k/XP, on Win98, and have seen the results; even the exact same driver we are talking about. It doesn't work.

    But, on the bright side, some of those Intel 8**G** chipset and video device drivers seem to support Win98. The device I pointed out had one. The issue is finding something without a fan. It seems anything that old, tends to have a fan.

  7. I haven't much info on this machine, but maybe the Xplore iX104C2 or iX104C3. It seems to come with the Intel 855GME. The audio is AC97. Up to 1Gb memory. 1Ghz or more.

    I also have no experience with the Intel 855GME. But it appears to support Win9x. Maybe not Win95?

    Edit: Nope. Watched a harddriver replacement video, and it has a fan.

    But it is a fairly small fan, and in an ideal location. Temps me to try the C4 at 1.4Ghz, with CPU throttling and a custom (larger) heatsink (Digikey). However, it would probably need USB for a keyboard. So no unicorn here.

  8. 31 minutes ago, sonyu said:

    so it isn't something about Himem.sys or system.ini patch, right?

    I'd say no. But we don't even know, for certain, that the conflict is the one causing the video issue. And we don't know if the laptop you are looking at has the same issue, or not.

     

    33 minutes ago, sonyu said:

    Anyway will be hard to find this one and also to check if it's fanless...

    The pics on Parkytowers show a fan.

    34 minutes ago, sonyu said:

    Thanks

    Well, I hope I'm not making it harder. But, you are very welcome.

  9. 1 hour ago, sonyu said:

    Can we know more info about the VIA chipset looking at these photos of the mobo:

    Linux lpsci result for almost the same hardware can be found here (HP Mini-Note PC 2133) :

    https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/HP/HP2133

    And the owner tried Windows Millenium on it and posted the results here: https://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?t=62888

    It could be due to excessive Video RAM memory used (maybe) cause he has 2GB of ram or it could be Windows ME missing some updates, I don't know...

    Strange cause he have problems even with VBEMP

    The chip you are seeing, is likely the VT8237 (or variant). The one you want to see, is probably under that nice big heatsink.

    The guy on Vogons suggests this:

    Quote

    P.S. I read that some non-VIA motherboards, based on VIA's chipsets have broken Windows 9x compatibility as opposed to VIA's own motherboards based on same chipsets. Perhaps this is the case. I hope someone can find a solution to this problem.

    I don't know where he/she heard that. If true, the laptop you are looking at is a VIA motherboard. But it kinda looks like the HP is too.

    Another thing to keep in mind, is that we don't know what driver he/she tried to install. There is no link. If you install a Win2k driver, it will often let you (using the .inf file). But no files are listed under "Device Manager", and you end up with with the default Windows driver (640x480 16bit). The registry tells "Device Manager" the correct new driver name, and itself says the device is working. But it is the old driver that is working. The comment about the mouse being invisible and then visible, during driver exchanges, makes it seem like the driver could have been correct.

    And he/she may have a system conflict. Perhaps one that can't be resolved, on that system. Sometimes that fix is only provided for the modern supported OS. The conflict may also come from something installed. I've had issues with NUSB and Scitech Display Doctor. Although, I've never had a problem with Vbemp. So that is interesting. Unfortunately, this is a risk one takes sailing into less charted waters.

    There is a screenshot showing a resource conflict. Sometimes you can manually adjust theses things, and everything will work out fine. It doesn't look like anyone suggested he/she try that. I noticed the resource conflict was related to ACPI BIOS. So there is the potential for this being broken Win9x support. But it is hard to tell.

    I've personally had problems with VIA video drivers not working, on supported versions of Windows. The problem arises when the lowest supported version of Windows is near being dropped; and that being the version I am using.

    I'd say this is a riskier laptop.

  10. 2 hours ago, sonyu said:

     

    Well, I look for:

    - portable (laptop > tablet for what I'm looking for, but doesn't matter if it's a tablet or a convertible like this one)

    - fanless

    - 512 to 2gb ram 

    - > 1024x768

     

    why fanless? Cause once you try you don't want anything else with current SSD prices and NVME NGFF speeds I prefer to loss some cpu power and have less noise. Well the real reason was because the fan of an old laptop that I have some ago, made lot of noise, I know there are tons of fan sizes and forms but I prefer without it since I discovered these type of devices running fanless cpus back in 2014. In terms of maintenance, of course over time the fan can make more noise.. so this is an extra point; you don't need to worry about it. just the right quantity of thermal grease and all will be FUN without FAN :D:lol::cool:

    I know I can buy  a weeCee or a thin client to have w98 and put a gpu on it, but I prefer to have a laptop so I can have my beloved w98 everywhere 

    So the candidates are:

    VAIO X505 only sold in Japan if I'm not wrong, and this is compatible with Windows 98 

    Also the PCG-505 

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Vaio_505_series

    The first one looks amazing, will I need to say how much a "fruit" company was inspired by these to release it's "laptop air" ? If you take a look back in history, you'll see how amazing are all SONY designs. I love all of them. UMPCs, Picturebook C1, Vaio p11Z... hardware it's maybe a bit limited for some games, but it's amazing to have one of these small laptops with windows 98. Back in year 2000 I think these were more expensive than 2010s small laptops aka netbooks...

    ENJOY the most beautiful laptop ever made:

    Really difficult to find , and still very expensive when you find it online these days: 

    https://www.ebay-kleinanzeigen.de/s-anzeige/sony-vaio-x505-subnotebook-so-nur-in-japan-zu-bekommen-ovp-/1042232314-278-3030

    I have a Sony VAIO PCG-Z505RX.

    Since it is older, it does have a fan. Although, it is not very loud. What I didn't know, when I bought it, was that it has a custom Ethernet connector. It required a special adapter for the actual RJ45 connection. It was an Ebay purchase, and didn't come with the adapter. It also required a special dongle for parallel, serial, and VGA. I eventually did hunt them both down. My particular model came with Neomagic audio and video. The audio is AC97 and the video lacks 3D acceleration (per specification). It also could not be upgraded beyond 128Mb of ram. Despite all of this, I still really like the machine.

    The X505's Intel Extreme Graphics 2 should perform aptly. The one in the Ebay link "does" provide all the connectors. This laptop is certainly fanless.

    As for the PCG 505, some of the V and R types seem up your alley. Wikipedia does not seem to specify the videos chips, for all of them. But some come with nice 3D acceleration. There are some nicely priced V and R types, on ebay, if you don't mind buying a harddrive separate. However, they all seem to have fans. I did "not" check every model. One may indeed be fanless. The question would then be, if fanless, what GPU does it have. When looking at the VAIOs, make sure to see a bottom picture. Some have fan vents, only on the bottom.

    Edit: Something I've been meaning to try, is using a higher speed laptop and forcing the CPU throttle down. Then installing a slightly thicker heatsink (copper or graphite?), to replace the old one and it's fan. Intel Speed Step can be controlled in Dos, Windows, and Linux. Maybe one wouldn't even need to replace the heatsink. With 3D acceleration, it would probably be better if the video chip was a less performant one. I've been meaning to try this out, the target being a Thinkpad t42 with Radeon 7500 (Omega driver); but it died before I got the chance.

    Note: Some laptops will not boot, with the fan disconnected. Some finessing may be required.

    I suppose that is something you could consider, in your hunt. You might be able to aim for slightly beyond a Win98 video chip, if it is well supported by the one of the Win9x community driver packs (Nvidia/Radeon). Then the worst you might need to contend with, is a small USB audio adapter.

  11. 4 hours ago, sonyu said:

    Thanks for your research @awkduck !!

    Yes, I know the standard of that era was 1024x768 (sometimes it can be forced to a higher resolution in w95 / w98 but I don't remember if it depends on the monitor connected or the gpu...)

    Anyway, I found the a lightweight tablet, I need to check if it have a fan

    It's a Pentium M

    I need to check also the 3D support

    What do you think?

    And... does it have WDDM drivers (just in case I want to dual boot windows 7,8,10 one day)? I have seen it have NVIDIA Geforce 4 Go 420 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP_Compaq_tc1100

    Not all versions come with nvidia gpu, I think this one has only  "Intel 82852/82855 GM/GME "

    Plenty of machines well exceed 1024x768. Though, it was certainly the average user resolution.

    It doesn't look bad. If it has 3D support, it would be great!

    I could nitpick at a gold brick. So any "negative" critique should be taken with a grain of salt.

    It uses a real IDE interface. So you don't have to worry about a specialized SSD board, or anything of the sort. That is something to watch for on Tablets.

    It might be interesting to watch some of the "teardown" videos (Youtube). They may give more info about the machine, compared to the average review video. Is the keyboard is a PS2 connection? If so, that would be a plus. It isn't terribly important, but might make things easier. For example, if you "Exit to Dos" from Windows. If the keyboard is USB, then bios supports PS2 emulation; until windows loads a USB driver for it. It can be tricky setting a system like that up. It wasn't mentioned on Reddit, so it probably was not a problem.

    It might be good, to see how hard it is to reach and remove the heatsink. Often these machines perform better, with new thermal grease. If you do get into that, make sure you know how much thermal grease to use. Depending on how the heatsink seats, too much grease can cause overheating. Also, if it is conductive grease, you don't want to risk it shorting something, from extruded overflow.

    It might be harder to find a teardown, with the removal of the heatsink. It would be interesting to see how the GPU is cooled. Often it is cooled by the same heatsink as the CPU. When combined like that, sometimes the CPU uses thermal grease, but the GPU has a thermal pad. There is probably nothing wrong with that. But as a "nitpicker" I prefer both use thermal grease. You can find thermal padding, at the usual online stores. You'd probably what to pay attention to thickness. And in this case, a little too thick would be better than too thin. However, in all honesty, you could probably run with old dried thermal grease, and never care. Especially, with a tablet like this. The CPU is probably throttled back or specifically designed for less heat. So the performance improvement, from thermal grease replacement, is probably less noticeable.

    I like to have 3D support. But I'd use that tablet, even without it. I lost my gaming interests way back at "Halo - Combat Evolved".

    On the rare occasion, I look to play a game, Dos or older Windows games (software rendering) often due the trick. Probably more often it would be a console emulator. There are plenty of older versions, that don't require 3D acceleration (no N64,PS1,etc). It seems games you can easily start and then walk away from, get more attention from me. But every once in awhile I like to revisit something like ONI.

    If 3D acceleration is a sticking point, make sure it has it. Otherwise you'll eventually end up lurking about for something else.

    If the machine does support 3D acceleration, the 32Mb video ram should be okay. The driver link on Reddit is dead. It links to Helpjet, which went offline a while ago. But, I'm pretty sure Win9x drivers, for Nvidia, are well archived.

    If it didn't have 3D, and you could live without it, then I don't see you having an issue, with the overall aspects of this tablet. There is even a chance that SBEMU would give you pure Dos support, for the SoundBlaster. You might make sure that it has AC97 for audio. It would almost have to. Its probably a safe bet.

    I also choose fanless machines. I really dislike hunting for a replacement fan (keeping old machines alive). But it also comes in handy, when recording audio. What drives your hunt for a fanless machine?

  12. @sonyu I found a couple of fanless laptops, near Win98 era. They are a bit bulky and most have no Win9x 3D support. The ToughBook and Getac laptops are mostly fanless. They have some Centrino Pentium-M and Core 2 Duo machines. The Core 2 Duo machines would probably need USB audio. The Pentium-M machines have AC97, and audio should work find with Win9x.

    If you hunted, you might find a Panasonic ToughBook CF-28. It supposedly has an "Intel 830MG (Win9x 3D compatible)". They range between 1Ghz and 800Mhz. But it is a Pentium III. However, I bet it would run circles around the Wyse laptop. But the real problem would be the resolution. A 1024x768 maximum, with some models only supporting a 800x600 maximum. I guess it depends if it is a touchscreen or not.

    They are probably not going to reach the display sizes you've mentioned. And they all have strange harddrive caddies. If you don't have a caddie, you can't install a harddrive. This is unlike many other laptop brands, where the caddie is more like a guide. These caddies have the drive connector in them. The caddie then connects to some a non standard connector, inside the laptop.

  13. The ParkyTowers site lists "integrated in CN896" in the Video section.

    If you scroll down a bit, on the ParkyTower page, you'll find the results of "lspci". You'll have to click it to expand. While CN896 is listed in there, it is combined with two others. So you'd have to determine how he derived that it was indeed a "CN896". If he downloaded a driver for XP/XPe and the "CN879", the driver likely supports all three. For Win98, that would not be the case.

    There may be a chance, it is supported. I don't want to dash any hopes. But I have been unable to confirm that it has the "CN896" chipset/GPU.

    Also, the exact model might make a difference. With the Wyse Vx9(LE) series, I noticed some variations. Some came with DVI+ and others with only VGA. They also didn't all have the same Video chip. If you check the ParkyTower pages for the Vx0L and Vx0LE, you can see he lists the video as "VN700?". This is what he says about that:

    Quote

    I haven't removed the heatsinks but, when running Tinycore Linux, an lspci identifies the graphics chip/driver as: CN700/PM4800 Pro/PM4800 CE/VN800 [S3 UniChrome Pro]

    The command he used (lspci), for that output, is from Linux. The driver developed for Linux supports all three of those chipsets. That is why it is listing all three. It is more complicated than that. Maybe it supports others, but groups those three together as a set. This is a similar situation to the Laptop.

    If you can confirm that it is the "CN896", then the chances are better.

    If you can't confirm the chipset, you can email the author of ParkyTowers. He does reply to email.

    But if I had to bet on it, I would bet against Win9x support.

    Vbemp would provide support, without 3D acceleration. I've used it with multiple laptops, VGA output, and I believe DVI. For sure, the VGA from DVI+.

    If you don't mind me asking, what is your desired budget? A Pentium M @ 1-1.6Ghz would probably be cheap. Video with "Official" Win98 support might take some hunting.

    Snap, I forgot you wanted fanless. I guess the below wouldn't work.

    I think the Dell Inspiron 6000 has a Radeon X300. I believe drivers for Win98 exist for that. I see them on Ebay, without hard drives, for about $30. You could the get an SDcard to 2.5 IDE adapter. Might be a pain to get the adapter seated, in the laptop. There are adapters for CFcards, too. There are even mSata to 2.5 IDE kits. They are the size of a full drive and easier to seat (more expensive).

  14. 1 hour ago, sonyu said:

    Will I be able to get Windows 98 running with the VGA / DVI video output working or there are no gpu and chipset drivers ?

    The video chip is one of "CN896/VN896/P4M900". The oldest Windows "officially" supported is 2000.

    VBEMP or SciTech-DisplayDoctor7 might work with it. But I am unsure if you will have dual display support. Though, it probably provides video cloning. No 3D drivers, for Win9x.

    The other issue is the audio chip. It is also not "officially" supported. There is a Win16 HDA audio driver. Some people have had luck getting that to work. Alternatively, you could buy a cheap USB audio adapter. Win98 has generic support for that.

  15. 22 hours ago, justacruzr2 said:

    Was one of those mags "Compute"?

    Maybe? There was a variety, handed down to me, from my step-father.

    22 hours ago, justacruzr2 said:

    The calibration is set on the chip that's on that board and no 2 are the same.

    I didn't know that. It should've been an obvious assumption, on my part. I have only worked with the actuator assembly.

    22 hours ago, justacruzr2 said:

    Should we take this conversation private?

    I would probably be kind.

     

  16. 2 hours ago, justacruzr2 said:

    IBM 360, The RPG was on an IBM 370 System3 and the COBOL/JCL/DB2/CICS was on an IBM S390

    I don't know if this would interest you. I've mean to eventually check it out, for x86.

    In some ways, COBOL is still a "Hot" language.

    2 hours ago, justacruzr2 said:

    Programming on a mainframe is awesomely cool

    I've never had the pleasure. When I was a young man, my mother worked for "Cray Research". The closest I ever got, was by looking through the lab windows; you could see from the cafeteria.

    2 hours ago, justacruzr2 said:

    For my 1st computer (the little TI99 4/A)

    So did my cousin. I had the Tandy Color Computer II. We both got them as hand-me-downs. They were beyond their expiration date, at that time. I never actually learned the included Basic. I just copied text, from old magazines.

    2 hours ago, justacruzr2 said:

    they returned it to me 2 days later saying there was nothing.  I really never believed that.  There must be something on there that can be saved.

    If it was IDE, I'm not sure they even plugged it in. They might not do much, for hardware failure. They can probably deal with "bad blocks".  You could buy a duplicate "working" drive online. It needs to be the exact same model; same revision and everything. Depending on what is wrong, with the drive, the external boards can be swapped. If it is internal hardware, then it can be replaced, from the working drive.

    I "don't" recommend that you do the internal repairs yourself. There are special tools needed, for each drive brand. Even if you have the tools, it is very easy to make a mistake. It is also hard to create a safe environment, for opening the drive. I have seen it work out, when no "special" tools where used and no special environment conditions were provided. But, perhaps they would have recovered more data, had the disks not been exposed to dust.

    There are places you can send drives, to have this work done. I also don't know if they support older hardware.

  17. This is a USB driver "fork" from the "USB OPL3 RetroWave".

    The fork is by "Crazii", the person responsible for SBEMU.

    Like with SBEMU, this driver won't really provide any function to Win9x (untested). But it will be useful to some Win9x users.

    Some machines have no PS2 keyboard/mouse support. Or, if they do, you'll loose it when Windows loads your USB drivers.

    With this driver, you can potentially enable USB keyboard/mouse support, by using it with "DOSSTART.BAT".

    This way you can exit to Dos, and not be stranded.

  18. On 2/23/2023 at 11:18 PM, justacruzr2 said:

    There is also the consideration, especially on older systems, that Intel did not put the CPU instruction set in the same place on the chip address-wise.  I've talked with some older programmers who would complain that code would sometimes have to be re-written due to this.

    Just to be clear, have you yourself written in assembly? Its not important. I just wanted to ask.

  19. Seems there is some, progressive, work on a Dos SoundBlaster emulator (real/protected).

    This is what the SBEMU project page says:

    Quote

    Sound blaster emulation with OPL3 for AC97.

    Supported Sound cards:

    Intel ICH / nForce

    Intel High Definition Audio

    VIA VT82C686, VT8233

    The VT82C868 & ICH4 are tested working on real machine.
    ICH & HDA tested working in virtualbox, not verified on real machine yet.
    HDA tested working by community.

    Emulated modes/cards:
    8 bit & 16 bit DMA (mono, stereo, high-speed)
    Sound blaster 1.0, 2.0, Pro, 16.

    Requirements:

    HDPMI32i (HDPMI with IOPL0)

    QEMM (optional, used for real mode games)

    There are more recent, beta files, found on a well know legacy computing forum. Github seem to have an early release.

    I don't see this being useful to Win9x. But it'll probably be useful to people, who use Win9x

  20. I have had problems, using HxD, to save RAM images over 350Mb. When using Grub4dos, the error is "Stream Read Error". With Grub2/Memdisk(from Syslinux), there is no error. But when you boot the saved image, there is filesystem corruption.

    I'm not entirely sure it is the size of the image, causing the problem. It could be specific machines. I haven't investigated it very much.

    A work around is a Dos USB/Fat32 drive and Partition Saving. This won't work, if the available Dos USB drivers don't work for your machine. There  are some good Dos USB drivers out there. But even the "demo" Dosusb drivers operate long enough, to do a back-up.

    Note:These drivers don't work with "EMM386".

    The other problem, is that Partition saving adds a very small header. It needs to be cut off, after saving.

    If your machine has no PS2 keyboard support, you may have to add a batch file to "C:\Windows\Dosstart.bat". "Partition Saving" can be automated through a configuration file. Then you just exit to Dos, and your batch handles it for you.

    Note:If you have prevented Windows from installing a Driver, for a specific USB, your BIOS PS2 Emulation may still work.

  21. On 2/23/2023 at 11:18 PM, justacruzr2 said:

    Hope you're feeling better now.  And I did understand your reply.

    Its nothing to severe, long term. Sometimes only a few hours. But it has prevented me from engaging employment, in remote administration. Such is the way of things.

    On 2/23/2023 at 11:18 PM, justacruzr2 said:

    Seems like you know or know about several modern programming languages.  My experience is limited to the older ones.  I've programmed in ML (Machine Language/Binary), Assembly, RPG, Cobol, CICS, JCL, DB2 and Basic.  There is also the consideration, especially on older systems, that Intel did not put the CPU instruction set in the same place on the chip address-wise.  I've talked with some older programmers who would complain that code would sometimes have to be re-written due to this.  But I think this had to do with changes between the 286, 386 and 486 chips and then the Pentium line.  I think they have probably standardized it by now.  It's been about 10 years since I did any programming.  The last thing I was working on was lost when the hard drive crashed.  I had 7 years invested in that.  It was a large project.  I only just recently was able to recover an old backup of it which unfortunately is 7 years older than the last time I worked on it.  Trying to remember everything I did during those 7 years is impossible.  I should have made a more recent backup.  Live and learn.  Nothing new on the Java front.  I've taken a break to let my mind clear.  I do this sometimes so I can come back to it with a fresh perspective.  Oh, it wasn't Nero but I think it was one of the other Java updates.  I have Java 5 update 18, 21 and 22.  I probably grabbed the wrong one and didn't notice.

    I've had many harddrive failures, in the last few years. That is part of what has taken me so long, in setting up a development environment. Add to it, that I am fickle at system crafting. The aim is redundant safe saves and quick machine portability.

    Years ago, I had a several year project zeroed on me. Ironically, it was in Java. It can really be discouraging. It has happened often enough, that I've learn to just let it go. However, once in a while, it was for the better.

    I have messed with many different languages and operating systems. Not many scripted languages. I don't care for Lisp, but ironically love Scheme; this causes me to admire ML. I like ASM, the simplicity of complexity. Most high level languages, seem like the complexity of simplicity; for the sake of organization/business. On the outside, Forth looks great; but I have yet to investigate it. The moving target of progression, has always seemed poorly implemented. Not having a career agenda, has greatly liberated my scope.

    When the 286/386 were in main use, and the 486 in fresh vogue, I really only used C and Batch. I was so out of the loop, I had never even known about Pascal. I knew about GWBasic, but never bothered to check it out. I was pretty young. While I find assembly a focus, I would not be the guy to address a wide range of processors. I initially set out targeting the NEC 186 V-chip. Even now, I find the Next186 pretty tempting. So I might get to learn all about these differences you've mentioned.

    Thanks, for sharing some of your history. I enjoyed it.

     

×
×
  • Create New...