Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Dietmar
-
@Damnation What have I to do with my original 5512 ntkrnlpa.exe, so that your files are all recogniced? And do you use ndis.sys, netio.sys, msrpc.sys from win7 SP1 bit32 ? Which storport.sys I should use Dietmar PS: Anyway nice work EDIT: I think, you forget the following "Make corrections to target driver XXX.sys so that it loads ntoskrn8.sys instead of the original ntoskrnl.exe"
-
@sookoop Even Win10 bit 32 you cant install on the MSI z690 A, I have this board also. But with the files from Ramsey you can install XP SP3 there. http://www.zone94.com/downloads/software/operating-systems/123-windows-xp-professional-sp3-x86-integral-edition Dietmar PS: Choose (2) (3) 4 (6) (7) G . I test also the Msi pro z690-a ddr4 board with 12900k cpu for XP SP3. Only with the very first Bios 7D25v10 2021-09-15 I succeed to boot XP SP3 (only after CMOS reset). On the PS/2 slot keyboard and mouse do not work together, only one each.
-
Here is another report about TZ10 on a Gigabyte 450 board Dietmar ACPI thermal zone - does my pc think it’s overheating? Open I’ve had some issues with my computer recently. From the most recent breaking point, I was playing PUBG when big black lines started appearing through the game world, then the game just shut down and other apps starting freezing and shutting down. No error messages etc of any kind. Since then, I could log into windows for a bit but the same thing would happen - apps just shut down and nothing would really work. The screen would flicker black and eventually just go fully black. However, it does work in safe mode - although stuff starts shutting down if anything is “intensive”, like scrolling around a google search in chrome. I’ve had a look through event logs and there’s a lot to see, none of which I really understand. I can post lots more if that’d be helpful and if one issue in particular that I think could be relevant turns out to be wrong. So that specific log is ACPI TZ.TZ10 thermal zone has been enumerated. What I understand is it’s just saying how hot it is, but it also lists CRT and HOT values for when it starts throttling/shutting down? (But if that’s wrong please do say, then I can move onto the next theory) For that log, the HOT and CRT values are 292 and 291 kelvin, which is about 19 degrees Celsius, so my thought was that the computer starts throttling things way earlier than it really should. Am I completely wrong or maybe onto something?? I also flashed the BIOS, thinking maybe that was the issue, no help. The computers specs are: Motherboard: Gigabyte 450M S2H CPU: Ryzen 1600X GPU: NVIDIA 1050ti RAM: 8gb hyperx/fusion/Kingston (whichever it is..) PSU: NAXN 500W
-
Win10 seems to have this problem also Dietmar Windows 10 BSOD Help This is a brand new computer minus the GPU. Fresh windows 10 install. Display would freeze for a few seconds and the PC would reboot. Was wondering if it was a riser cable issue or PSU issue or driver issue. AMD 5900x EKWB 240 Basic AIO Gigabyte x570 I 1TB Sabrent Rocket NVMe 4.0 32GB DDR4 Corsair SF600 Gold with Corsair SF sleeved cables RX 580 /w 3.0 Riser Cable In the event viewer I see: ACPI thermal zone \_TZ.TZ10 has been enumerated. _PSV = 290K _TC1 = 0 _TC2 = 0 _TSP = 1000ms _AC0 = 0K _AC1 = 0K _AC2 = 0K _AC3 = 0K _AC4 = 0K _AC5 = 0K _AC6 = 0K _AC7 = 0K _AC8 = 0K _AC9 = 0K _CRT = 294K _HOT = 293K minimum throttle = 0 _CR3 = 0K
-
@LanXing The Bsod 0x000000A5 (0x00000003, xxx, 0xC0000034, yyy) happens in acpi.sys, when ACPIBuildCompleteMustSucceed fails. We need a log file via Windbg, to find the reason for this. A first check with Ida Pro shows this error 0xC0000034 at 11 different places, always with mov ..., C0000034 Dietmar
-
@George King @Mov AX, 0xDEAD I build acpi.sys V4 also without the _OSI modd, but now I test "full" acpi.sys V4 Dietmar PS: I think, this acpi error is different from all the others. It appears first time on all >= Skylake boards when using asl.exe for loading a DSDT table to Bios. Very easy way but this special Bsod destroys until now its possibility for to use with sense. Here is the loong output, about 1 Mbyte. I load new version up because it is better readable ottoASL5.7z
-
But a quick test with Windbg and the debug version of acpi.sys V4 shows something other Dietmar Break instruction exception - code 80000003 (first chance) nt!DbgBreakPoint: 80ac37e0 cc int 3 kd> g MM: Loader/HAL memory block indicates large pages cannot be used for 80100000->8012777F MTRR feature disabled. KiInitializeMTRR: OS support for MTRRs disabled KiInitializeMTRR: OS support for MTRRs disabled KiInitializeMTRR: OS support for MTRRs disabled KiInitializeMTRR: OS support for MTRRs disabled KiInitializeMTRR: OS support for MTRRs disabled KiInitializeMTRR: OS support for MTRRs disabled KiInitializeMTRR: OS support for MTRRs disabled KiInitializeMTRR: OS support for MTRRs disabled KiInitializeMTRR: OS support for MTRRs disabled KiInitializeMTRR: OS support for MTRRs disabled KiInitializeMTRR: OS support for MTRRs disabled KiInitializeMTRR: OS support for MTRRs disabled *** Assertion failed: (Pfn1->u3.e2.ReferenceCount != 0) || ((Pfn1->u3.e1.Rom == 1) && (CacheType == MmCached)) *** Source File: d:\xpsp\base\ntos\mm\iosup.c, line 6745 Break repeatedly, break Once, Ignore, terminate Process, or terminate Thread (boipt)? i i *** Assertion failed: (Pfn1->u4.PteFrame == MI_MAGIC_AWE_PTEFRAME) || (Pfn1->PteAddress == (PVOID) (ULONG_PTR)(X64K | 0x1)) || (Pfn1->u4.PteFrame == MI_MAGIC_4GB_RECLAIM) *** Source File: d:\xpsp\base\ntos\mm\iosup.c, line 6810 Break repeatedly, break Once, Ignore, terminate Process, or terminate Thread (boipt)? i i *** Fatal System Error: 0x000000a5 (0x00000003,0x314C5054,0xC0140004,0x494E495F) Break instruction exception - code 80000003 (first chance) A fatal system error has occurred. Debugger entered on first try; Bugcheck callbacks have not been invoked. A fatal system error has occurred. Connected to Windows XP 2600 x86 compatible target at (Sun Apr 24 23:33:12.187 2022 (UTC + 2:00)), ptr64 FALSE Loading Kernel Symbols ................................................ Loading User Symbols ******************************************************************************* * * * Bugcheck Analysis * * * ******************************************************************************* Use !analyze -v to get detailed debugging information. BugCheck A5, {3, 314c5054, c0140004, 494e495f} Probably caused by : ACPI.sys ( ACPI!ACPIBuildCompleteMustSucceed+43 ) Followup: MachineOwner --------- nt!RtlpBreakWithStatusInstruction: 80ac37ec cc int 3 2: kd> !analyze -v ******************************************************************************* * * * Bugcheck Analysis * * * ******************************************************************************* ACPI_BIOS_ERROR (a5) The ACPI Bios in the system is not fully compliant with the ACPI specification. The first value indicates where the incompatibility lies: This bug check covers a great variety of ACPI problems. If a kernel debugger is attached, use "!analyze -v". This command will analyze the precise problem, and display whatever information is most useful for debugging the specific error. Arguments: Arg1: 00000003, ACPI_FAILED_MUST_SUCCEED_METHOD ACPI tried to run a control method while creating device extensions to represent the ACPI namespace, but this control method failed. Arg2: 314c5054, The ACPI Object that was being run Arg3: c0140004, return value from the interpreter Arg4: 494e495f, Name of the control method (in ULONG format) Debugging Details: ------------------ ACPI_OBJECT: 314c5054 DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: DRIVER_FAULT BUGCHECK_STR: 0xA5 PROCESS_NAME: System ANALYSIS_VERSION: 6.3.9600.17237 (debuggers(dbg).140716-0327) x86fre LAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from 80a30d7b to 80ac37ec STACK_TEXT: b8583858 80a30d7b 00000003 b8583bb4 00000000 nt!RtlpBreakWithStatusInstruction b85838a4 80a319e6 00000003 8b15c888 8b113000 nt!KiBugCheckDebugBreak+0x19 b8583c84 80a31f77 000000a5 00000003 314c5054 nt!KeBugCheck2+0x574 b8583ca4 b7e3f953 000000a5 00000003 314c5054 nt!KeBugCheckEx+0x1b b8583cc0 b7e65fdd 8b1bba20 c0140004 00000000 ACPI!ACPIBuildCompleteMustSucceed+0x43 [c:\nt\base\busdrv\acpi\driver\nt\buildsrc.c @ 433] b8583cf8 b7e63e3d b7e3f910 c0140004 00000000 ACPI!AsyncCallBack+0xe5 [c:\nt\base\busdrv\acpi\driver\amlinew\sync.c @ 82] b8583d1c b7e66dbb c0140004 4556414c 8b113000 ACPI!RunContext+0x1f5 [c:\nt\base\busdrv\acpi\driver\amlinew\ctxt.c @ 649] b8583d44 b7e66ee7 8b113000 00000000 b7e85408 ACPI!InsertReadyQueue+0x15a [c:\nt\base\busdrv\acpi\driver\amlinew\sched.c @ 275] b8583d64 b7e57fdf 8b15b468 00000000 8b272020 ACPI!RestartCtxtPassive+0x54 [c:\nt\base\busdrv\acpi\driver\amlinew\sched.c @ 384] b8583dac 80bd81ac 00000000 00000000 00000000 ACPI!ACPIWorker+0xbf [c:\nt\base\busdrv\acpi\driver\nt\worker.c @ 302] b8583ddc 80ae4212 b7e57f20 00000000 00000000 nt!PspSystemThreadStartup+0x34 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 nt!KiThreadStartup+0x16 STACK_COMMAND: kb FOLLOWUP_IP: ACPI!ACPIBuildCompleteMustSucceed+43 [c:\nt\base\busdrv\acpi\driver\nt\buildsrc.c @ 433] b7e3f953 c7401802000000 mov dword ptr [eax+18h],2 FAULTING_SOURCE_LINE: c:\nt\base\busdrv\acpi\driver\nt\buildsrc.c FAULTING_SOURCE_FILE: c:\nt\base\busdrv\acpi\driver\nt\buildsrc.c FAULTING_SOURCE_LINE_NUMBER: 433 FAULTING_SOURCE_CODE: 429: // Note: we don't have a race condition here because only one 430: // routine can be processing a request at any given time. Thus it 431: // is safe for us to specify a new next phase 432: // > 433: buildRequest->NextWorkDone = WORK_DONE_FAILURE; 434: 435: // 436: // Transition to the next stage 437: // 438: ACPIBuildCompleteCommon( SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX: 4 SYMBOL_NAME: ACPI!ACPIBuildCompleteMustSucceed+43 FOLLOWUP_NAME: MachineOwner MODULE_NAME: ACPI IMAGE_NAME: ACPI.sys DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 626570df IMAGE_VERSION: 5.1.2600.7777 FAILURE_BUCKET_ID: 0xA5_ACPI!ACPIBuildCompleteMustSucceed+43 BUCKET_ID: 0xA5_ACPI!ACPIBuildCompleteMustSucceed+43 ANALYSIS_SOURCE: KM FAILURE_ID_HASH_STRING: km:0xa5_acpi!acpibuildcompletemustsucceed+43 FAILURE_ID_HASH: {5ff4cd30-9433-c4e0-8096-0615b3b5c98a} Followup: MachineOwner ---------
-
There is another interesting thing, what can be tested with the new acpi.sys V4. I remember, that on newer DSDT table, before with acpi.sys version 6666 I got Bsod when I load this acpi table via asl /loadtable dsdt.aml Before, the asl Tool vers 4 or vers 5 fails with BSOD 0x000000A5 (0x00000003, xxx, C0140001, yyy) after uploading a working DSDT table for Acpi. Always when you load a DSDT table via asl /loadtable from Skylake above you get this Bsod with acpi.sys 6666. When this Bsod can be solved, it will be much more easy to upload any DSDT table to XP, because XP SP3 listens to registry entry for DSDT (or FACP etc.). Winserver 2003 listens only to Bios DSDT. Dietmar
-
I just notice, that with the new Quantum browser 68.12.2b download and upload on XP SP3 are about 6% faster than with Firefox 52.9.0 . Ping is the same Dietmar
-
@Damnation Thanks for the tip ). Here is answer from Intel about the Intel X540-T2 10Gigabit Dietmar The X540 uses an automatic MDI/MDI-X configuration. Intel recommends using straight through cables. Where crossover cables are used, all four pairs must be crossed. Using crossover cables where only some pairs are crossed is not supported and might result in link failure or slow links.
-
@Mov AX, 0xDEAD How big can the parts from a real DSDT be, that you can integrate in the DSDT from Qemu, so that Qemu still works? Have you tested this? And gives Qemu the same Bsod about failed to build DDB, when you run it with a zero size buffer in its given DSDT on a XP SP3 guest (Target) Dietmar
-
I just ordered 2 used Intel X540-T2 10Gigabit lan cards, Dev_1528 . It has 2 RJ45 connectors each. They have driver for win2003 Bit32 and Bit64 and work with driver from 2 March 2013 under XP and ndis.sys V5 as a check with Dependency Walker tells me. Dont know, if for a short direct connection compi to compi with cable of 2m you need Cat6 cable, hope not Dietmar EDIT: The X540-T2 with Dev_1528 is also supported in Windbg Ethernet NICs for Network Kernel Debugging in Windows 8.1 . https://www.hardware-mag.de/artikel/sonstiges/asus_und_intel_10_gbits_netzwerkkarten_im_test/