heinoganda

@5eraph For a long time I keep a list of required updates for .NET Framework 3.5 and 4 on Windows XP x86. All necessary updates here, from May 2014 here with download link. A separate thread regarding .NET Framework updates would be Clearly arranged.

@Dave-H The following .NET Framework updates are no longer needed: For NDP20SP2-KB3135986-x86.exe NDP20SP2-KB2863239-x86.exe 10/04/2013 + NDP20SP2-KB3035488-x86.exe 05/11/2015 For NDP20SP2-KB3142027-x86.exe NDP20SP2-KB2972105-x86.exe 10/14/2014 My .NET Framework lists are be updated soon!

Thanks for the info, it was about time, especially since some updates were missing after September 2015 by .NET Framework 2 and 3 respectively. In .NET Framework 4 also missing 2 updates. In order for the update for the .NET Framework 3.5 and 4.0 on Windows XP are complete again! For Windows XP further the following updates were available: WindowsXP-KB3168965-x86-XXX.exe WindowsXP-KB3170455-x86-XXX.exe IE8-WindowsXP-KB3160005-x86-XXX.exe

The definition database MSE is reset, as with "MpCmdRun.exe -RemoveDefinitions -All". It is not a key, but four keys (uppercase letter). (Four keys reason so not by mistake the definition database of MSE is reset!) @all Microsoft Security Essentials Definition Updater update to version 1.3 Windows Defender Definition Updater update to version 1.1 Have several bugs corrected.

@JodyT In terms PaleMoon it is not so bad (for him like sorry me) as long as the Mozilla project (Firefox) is not affected and hopefully still works for a long time under Windows XP x86. As regards to the mainstream, because I have done so some experience in the musical field. I hate any kind of commercial music, which gives an nothing only "la la la la" and folk stupefaction! There are simply a lot of good music will never be played alone in mainstream radio, because only counts quota. Sorry I am digressing from the real issue. @Dibya When I think of it as Windows XP x86 was completed formally in April 2014 a disaster (Various Business software did not work as it should, now with the latest updates, the problems have practically done it by themselves). The about conspiracy theory MS, faith is just not knowledge!

Well, if PaleMoon thinks the Atom/XP build will no longer have to provide, it's not nearly as bad since the original code from Firefox (Mozilla project) comes and as long as from this side of the browser's functionality in Windows XP does not lose it does not bother me a bit. The developers and programmers when PaleMoon project are unfortunately on the Microsoft rail on the road, very regrettable. Worse, it looks at the Chromium project (original code), since here a very big effort is driven in order to suppress the function under Windows XP and Vista. All that remains of the comment, with money you can buy (corrupt) everything.

Microsoft Office File Validation (OFV info) Add-in get updates from office 2010. Thanks for the info for new update (KB2881030).

@DrWho3000 Look at the date, we have May and not in June! Your computer is a month in the future! Change the system date from 30/06/2016 to 30/05/2016!

@Roffen It should be ensured that the following 2 keys do not exist in the registry, may need to be deleted: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\WPA\WEPOS] [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\WPA\WES] the following keys must remain respectively be present: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\WPA\POSReady] Note: All entries in the Reg Key "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\WPA" can while XP is running not delete. To delete entries you need a boot medium where a Reg Editor can access the registry of the operating system. (For example ERD Commander or Kaspersky Rescue Disk)

This is really a bit too hard. Perhaps it is also because of the new information policy of MS, as well as apples are sold as pear! Note: Also has anyone to edit problems here in the forum no contributions retroactively? For me at the moment not possible.

The first attempts were unsuccessful, to times when PaleMoon Project this plugin is not supported, for obvious reasons and because maybe also various code has been removed in this respect does not make it easier. A very bumpy ride because it appears here is no simple solution. Despite everything, I stay tuned to find a solution.

First, at Slimjet a minimum encrypting TLS1.0 should be standard again! Second, Java and Firefox its own certificate management have where ECC certificates (Info) work fine under Windows XP. Instead around to tamper with the minimum encryption should also own certificate management which should be considered to Slimjet future can still use Windows XP here. At Google Chrome browser on Windows XP by ECC certificates exists the same problem. Otherwise I do not see why I should have to invest time in this problem to post in Slimjet Forum since this problem is likely to be familiar to programmers! Update: New version (10.0.5.0), new luck with the same error. Too bad, so is Slimjet in Windows XP for encrypted pages a security risk! The problem I have posted in Slimjet forum where I can only hope that is found here is a solution especially Google Chrome also does not resort to SHA-1 certificates when a secure certificate is available.

@Dave-H Ok, this is also clarified. Thank you for the correct interpretation. @Sampei.Nihira There is a problem in Slimjet Version 10.0.1.0/10.0.2.0 with encrypted pages, which is still partially resorted here to SHA-1 certificates, here at least would have a way to exist in this set with flags so that I can decide whether the browser should use this insecure encryption! The clearly lacks and is a no go! Too bad, if it fails in the encryption. Here necessarily needs to be improved at this problem again! Update: Meanwhile, I have a culprit. A certificate that is for "Equifax Secure Certificate Authority" issued (valid from 08/22/1998 to 08/22/2018), when it is imported into the revoked certificates, the problem no longer exists. Could that be this certificate, in this newer Chrome variant, is on a kind of exclusion list. Is obviously bad comparing to start since Google Chrome from the 50 version to Windows XP fails his service.

Info directly from mozilla: 1. Link to this item 2. Here at the official download page of Firefox, on Windows XP, these cases only one version 43.0.1 is offered. Link In how far the version 43.0.1 for Windows XP still a support is provided to me is unknown.

Good idea, going a little bit to test for the plugin.

When talking about Vivaldi I am very angry, but it's unfortunately the way it is. Become observe any case the Slimjet browser, I think that there in the foreseeable future, forced manner Supports Windows XP will expire. (Here remains probably only Windows XP as "adapt" that Chrome works again!) Now Firefox is officially at version 43.0.1 also closing for Windows XP, but here it was not so radical. Otherwise, the latest version of Firefox (46.0.1) works with EME unlock faultless for me and thus dodge a possibility. (releases) Note: sorry for my German gaffe.

@Dibya Just got the famous message "This application was interrupted with Ctrl+C"! Vivaldi Version 1.1.453.59 and 1.2.490.3. What I'm thinking about the Chromium project, I summarize better not in words!

@Sampei.Nihira All Chrome variants access to the certificate management of Windows, where it's known that this is completely out of date in Windows XP (Concretely takes the certificate management at least to the level of Windows 7 are brought) and for this reason can not be opened some encrypted websites. Compared Firefox has its own certificate management. What has surprised me even more is that the Slimjet browser should build on Chrome version 50.0.2661.75 and this works correctly on Windows XP! Oops, now I wonder have the Windows XP code implemented again at Slimjet?

@PROBLEMCHYLD Have you send PM!

@JorgeA I like to hear that nothing was found. Well, Malwarebytes Anti-Malware you can uninstall, as already written, as this only served as a kind of insurance again. Am I anxious times how it goes with the future definition updates for Defender to you. Note: Incidentally, in the "Windows Defender Definition Updater" I have the screen output refinished Furthermore there is also the possibility the file "Windows_Defender_DEF_UPD.exe" with WinRAR or 7zip to open, unpack complete in a directory and run the file "MSEDEFUPD.bat". Since your virus scanner should not go crazy, where appropriate the folder to the exception list of Avast in module file system protection. @PROBLEMCHYLD Have yet found a problem in the Temp folder in the second edition of MSE 4.8, my start delay of the user interface (client) leaves empty folders from 7zip sfx. The problem I have found and eliminated in the third edition. So far I am very satisfied of the service remains no longer occasionally hang when you start Windows XP (already in the second issue resolved). Furthermore, the user interface starts cleanly after a system reboot and not get stuck in the red functionless status. Just a note, the KSLDriver (version depending on the definition) of MSE will also automatically clean integrated as functional service, and during a search operation, the "Offline registry DLL" (offreg.XXXX.dll) version 6.3.9600.16384 (can be different, depending on the definition). @All If interested on MSE 4.8 for Windows XP x86 (third edition is the final version), please PM!

@JorgeA Why the Windows Defender definition updater when you can not start I can not reconstruct at the moment, ultimately, does this nothing more than before the actual update of the definition, delete the contents of the backup directory. Note: Why I suggested Malwarebytes Anti-Malware, the fact is indicative of this still so many problematic software respectively can delete them also reasonable (especially associated various registry entries). It is in this sense not a virus scanner, but a supplement specifically aimed at damaging programs and various promotional tools. A search with this program is at least an additional reinsurance, not the virus scanner is ever compromised. For Avast Free I can say that this is a good virus scanner, but various modules make more corrupt than they protect. The modules such as file system protection, mail protection, web protection and Software Updater are top and the rest is in my opinion for a ton.

@PROBLEMCHYLD Extract time Setup (MSEInstall_XP_EN-US.exe) in a folder, then also extract with 7zip from the file epp.msi (in x86 folder) the file "Antimalware_MsMpEng.exe" rename to "MsMpEng.exe" and copy in the program folder of MSE. After the computer restarts, the familiar message can be seen once again, because you can do it once to test whether there is the same problem. To return the message known to get rid of, just run in the folder of the extracted Setup files "restart.bat", a reboot may again necessary. (So you have at least the possibility also to a direct comparison of the two services.) Note: The service can be stopped and started again elegant. net stop msmpsvc net start msmpsvc

At the moment I'm dancing at two weddings! Now I have both run on! @JorgeA Did you get now solved the problem, Defender works again or has been uninstalled and reinstalled Defender? The last official definition update where I get to regular way 1.219.1973.0 from 05/16/2016. @PROBLEMCHYLD The problem I can currently not quite understand respectively have it tried several times without this effect, but stay tuned!

@JorgeA Have you ever Defender uninstalled and then reinstalled? Would I try definitely time because problem at least first of all be solved. Secondly, you can in the Directory "C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\Microsoft\Windows Defender\Definition Updates\Backup" delete the contents and even try a definition update to install. @PROBLEMCHYLD The directory (C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\Microsoft\Microsoft Antimalware\Definition Updates) the definition is stored in the folder with the GUID name, now it seems with every update this GUID to change with greater access to the HDD. If I noticed even with Windows Defender. Become times test with original service this scenario.

Windows Defender Definition Updater for Windows XP Download here Password n3"y9Khb1%vA7eU3BYz$h6K§vM9Crj5V2P&I429TD Update V1.1 on 07/11/2016 Update V1.0 Note: Have times longer Windows Defender tested when a current definition (starting from 13.05.2016) are no recent updates on the regular way found. In the Updater, there is the funtion of undo the antivirus update engine (RAUE) where that resolves the problem. (An intentional problem!) The real problem is the case of an update in the backup folder of definion the files can not be overwritten. This problem is circumvented by the Windows Defender Definition Updater. @PROBLEMCHYLD In Version 4.8, first or second mod. Version?