soldier1st
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by soldier1st
-
-
i already have this.
0 -
norton the one of the best around but not 2004 or 2005 but the earlier versions seem the best,avg isin't that good.trend micro is alright.
0 -
i prefer to stick to single os install disks.
0 -
maybe this time this sp will allow all apps to work like on sp1 did,unlike sp2 that some apps don't work on it properly.
0 -
az dude,the topic is 98se or me,stay on topic plz.anyways 98 se is the better of the 2,it may be a bit older but there are sp's n stuff for it wheras with me there ain't much of anything for it,it is at best buggy,98 se is great once you tweak it n stuff but it can't compare to xp.
0 -
what happened to time horton?haven't seen him for months.
0 -
when i ran it on another pc it worked fine,faster than any other sp gape has come up with.
0 -
plus Fat 32/16 can have file allocation errors(i used to get them and had a friend fix them cuzz back then i knew little about pc's) and be hard to fix it,with NTFS because it is not based on fat32/16, you will not encounter those same errors,what prathapml said is true about fragments, even if an NTFS drive is like 75% fragmented it will still operate quite well,if fat32/16 were fragmented at 75% then performance would drop dramaticaly and you could face random errors on a fat32/16 system.if you tweak the NTFS file system then it could perform quite well even if it is very fragmented.
jaclaz:i started from win 3.0 and went on to win95 then 98 then i tried me for a week but hated it cuzz it did weird things to me then i went to w2k pro then xp pro.
0 -
they should be updated to support all usb flash drives and cameras then it would be worthwhile.
0 -
sp4 for 2000 when i used it was too slow,even slower than sp3.a pack for sp3 and for sp4 ad more things to it cuzz it is newer n such,ms will support 2000 till 2008 or 2010.
0 -
and as long as ppl use 98 se and give good feedback n such then it will be made a better product but never perfect.
0 -
maybe they will be added back in the final 2.0 release.
0 -
on graphic cards 98 can but not the cpu itself(it's weird but thats the way it is)
0 -
this sp is great the rc3 of 2.0,these files are improved by people who want a more stable system,they are not hacked files they are official files(the hotfixes n such)some files are made by others but that does not make them hacked files.
0 -
98 sp 2.0 rc3 is what you want.
0 -
if longhorn does what i need it to do and the look is aceptable then i may just use it.
0 -
once 2.0 is released i can do a win98 app cleanup.
0 -
soon it will be released.
0 -
with win 98 you gotta slow down as it really can't keep up.
0 -
or don't expect one at all,a sp for me wouldn't hurt but doubt it would make me better than it is.
0 -
maybe he should support all usb flash drives and cameras,that would be simple and ppl would install it.
0 -
next year at the end of june 98 will no longer be supported by ms at all,right now it is well sorta.
0 -
actualy 98 had a bit less of a dos heart than 95 but me has even less of a dos heart,or actualy:the dos family of oses were not meant for more than 1 cpu as consumers did not need it,the nt family was for businesses and they were meant for more than 1 but now the nt is for everyone.
0 -
well i meant to say it's not recomended to noobs but same as 982me, sorry i did not phrase that clear enuf.i hope gapes pack will be relased soon.
0
98se with sp2.0 pc begins fast rapidly slows down
in Windows 9x Member Projects
Posted
you can get updated avg signatures at majorgeeks.com usualy every 2 days,same goes for norton.