tlatoani

It's just Impressive... Do you have more stuff like this? i would love to see it

Thank you, I'll check it

Does any body knows how to control bandwidth of each PC in a Local Area network?, I use one ethernet to get connected to Internet and other one to share the access with other 3 PC's in our little LAN, but i want to give just an amount of bandwidth to the others PC's.... Do you know a program who can do this?, we are using XP SP2 in all machines. Thank's for your time

Ok, I will put some histories soon, but i have to translate them, but i invite everybody to share your histories with us...

Well, that's it Phyridean, you just said everything... And i repeat, for me is the most romantic method in this times... you are not worried about how you look or how she looks, you are focus in her feelings, mind and soul...

Hey Dog, my girlfriend is in Florida too, and i'm afraid for Francis too, I'm an Aztec, a mexican for you, and i will never put a foot in that country but now i'm tempted to go in her rescue... By the way she is a beautiful venezuelan girl

As biohazrd said, you have the cam, voice or telephone to check the authenticity of the people arguments, and i agree with sleepnmojo about the extrovert of the people, i know many couples actually married now who find one each other trough the net, and in my stwisted mind find ths method very romantic , je je

What do you think about that? It works?, it's good?, it's for loosers? for desperated people? for the last romantic people?

Does anybody knows this game?, I thinks we may be can talk about the issues of this Massive online multiplayer game...

LOL

Yes, that's a spyware matter, i rather use Ad-aware to remove them

Gracias Ximopanolti Merci beaucoup Thank you

don't you think just may be the antivirus enterprises are involved in this affairs?

Well, you must have the ultimate computer hardware and download all the updates daily, otherway, you are out of bussiness Or You can use Linux with his incompatibility...

Well, i think thats near to an impossible, because the drivers of the hardware in the PC's are always in the page of the manufacturer and doesn't exist one main service who can make a "global drivers database" to be used as a absolute updater.

I still want that account, i never said i dont want it, maldito perro verde, i just wanted to share that info with you

That means the Operative System by himself cannot burn DVD or CD, but you still can use third part software like NERO

May be you don't have SP1, there is a fix for USB interfaz built in...

Well, when I was reading this post, I wanted an account immediately, when not qualify for an account with you I decided to get one by myself, and I found this very interesting information: (You can read the full note here http://gmail-is-too-creepy.com/) Presumably you have a Gmail account, and do not object to Google's policies But many of us will not send mail to gmail.com ... Problem 1: Gmail is nearly immortal Google offers 1 gig of storage, which is many times the storage offered by Yahoo or Hotmail, or other Internet service providers that we know about. The powerful searching encourages account holders to never delete anything. It takes three clicks to put a message into the trash, and more effort to delete this message. It's much easier to "archive" the message, or just leave it in the inbox and let the powerful searching keep track of it. Google admits that even deleted messages will remain on their system, and may also be accessible internally at Google, for an indefinite period of time. Google has been spinning their original position in press interviews, and with an informal page described as "a few words about privacy and Gmail." When we see fresh material from Google, we check the modification date at the bottom of the terms-of-use page and privacy page for Gmail. If these dates are still April 6 and April 8, we know that nothing has changed. Google can modify these pages too, any way they want and whenever they want, unilaterally. But at least these two pages carry slightly more legal weight than other pages, because Google should attempt to notify users of significant changes in these formal policies. A new California law, the Online Privacy Protection Act, went into effect on July 1, 2004. Google changed their main privacy policy that same day because the previous version sidestepped important issues and might have been illegal. For the first time in Google's history, the language in their new policy makes it clear that they will be pooling all the information they collect on you from all of their various services. Moreover, they may keep this information indefinitely, and give this information to whomever they wish. All that's required is for Google to "have a good faith belief that access, preservation or disclosure of such information is reasonably necessary to protect the rights, property or safety of Google, its users or the public." Google, you may recall, already believes that as a corporation they are utterly incapable of bad faith. Their corporate motto is "Don't be evil," and they even made sure that the Securities and Exchange Commission got this message in Google's IPO filing. Google's policies are essentially no different than the policies of Microsoft, Yahoo, Alexa and Amazon. However, these others have been spelling out their nasty policies in detail for years now. By way of contrast, we've had email from indignant Google fans who defended Google by using the old privacy language -- but while doing so they arrived at exactly the wrong interpretation of Google's actual position! Now those emails will stop, because Google's position is clear at last. It's amazing how a vague privacy policy, a minimalist browser interface, and an unconventional corporate culture have convinced so many that Google is different on issues that matter. After 180 days in the U.S., email messages lose their status as a protected communication under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, and become just another database record. This means that a subpoena instead of a warrant is all that's needed to force Google to produce a copy. Other countries may even lack this basic protection, and Google's databases are distributed all over the world. Since the Patriot Act was passed, it's unclear whether this ECPA protection is worth much anymore in the U.S., or whether it even applies to email that originates from non-citizens in other countries. Google's relationships with government officials in all of the dozens of countries where they operate are a mystery, because Google never makes any statements about this. But here's a clue: Google uses the term "governmental request" three times on their terms-of-use page and once on their privacy page. Google's language means that all Gmail account holders have consented to allow Google to show any and all email in their Gmail accounts to any official from any government whatsoever, even when the request is informal or extralegal, at Google's sole discretion. Why should we send email to Gmail accounts under such draconian conditions? Problem 2: Google's policies do not apply The phrasing and qualifiers in the Gmail privacy policy are creepy enough, but nothing in any of Google's policies or public statements applies to those of us who don't have Gmail accounts. Google has not even formally stated in their privacy policy that they will not keep a list of keywords scanned from incoming email, and associate these with the incoming email address in their database. They've said that their advertisers won't get personally identifiable information from email, but that doesn't mean that Google won't keep this information for possible future use. Google has never been known to delete any of the data they've collected, since day one. For example, their cookie with the unique ID in it, which expires in 2038, has been tracking all of the search terms you've ever used while searching their main index. Problem 3: A massive potential for abuse If Google builds a database of keywords associated with email addresses, the potential for abuse is staggering. Google could grow a database that spits out the email addresses of those who used those keywords. How about words such as "box cutters" in the same email as "airline schedules"? Can you think of anyone who might be interested in obtaining a list of email addresses for that particular combination? Or how about "mp3" with "download"? Since the RIAA has sent subpoenas to Internet service providers and universities in an effort to identify copyright abusers, why should we expect Gmail to be off-limits? Intelligence agencies would love to play with this information. Diagrams that show social networks of people who are inclined toward certain thoughts could be generated. This is one form of "data mining," which is very lucrative now for high-tech firms, such as Google, that contract with federal agencies. Email addresses tied to keywords would be perfect for this. The fact that Google offers so much storage turns Gmail into something that is uniquely dangerous and creepy. Problem 4: Inappropriate ad matching We don't use Gmail, but it is safe to assume that the ad matching is no better in Gmail, than it is in news articles that use contextual ad feeds from Google. Here's a screen shot that shows an inappropriate placement of Google ads in a news article. We also read about a lawyer who is experimenting with Gmail. He sent himself a message, and discovered that the law practice footer he uses at the bottom of all of his email triggered an ad for a competing law firm. Another example is seen in the Google ads at the bottom of this story about Brandon Mayfield. There are two ads. One mentions sexual assault charges (sex has nothing to do with the story), and the other is about anti-terrorism. The entire point of this article, as well as a New York Times piece on May 8, 2004, is that a lawyer has had his career ruined due to overreaction by the FBI, based on disputed evidence. He was arrested as a material witness and his home and office were searched. The NYT (page A12) says that "Mr. Mayfield was arrested before investigators had fully examined his phone records, before they knew if he had ever met with any of the bombing suspects, before they knew if he had ever traveled to Spain or elsewhere overseas. His relatives said he had not been out of the United States for 10 years." The only evidence is a single fingerprint on a plastic bag, and some FBI officials have raised questions about whether this print is a match. While Mr. Mayfield will get his day in court, it appears that Google's ads have already convicted him, and for good measure added some bogus sexual assault charges as well. Would Mr. Mayfield be well-advised to send email to Gmail account holders to plead his case? Our last example shows three ads fed by Google at the bottom of a Washington Post column titled "Gmail leads way in making ads relevant." The columnist argues that Google's relevant ads improve the web, and therefore she finds nothing objectionable about Gmail. These Google-approved ads offer PageRank for sale, something which only a year ago, Google would have considered high treason. Yes, these ads are "relevant" -- the column is about Google, and the ads are about PageRank. But here's the point: A relevant ad that shows poor judgment is much worse than an irrelevant ad that shows poor judgment. The ads at the bottom of her column disprove her pro-Google arguments. She has no control over this, and is probably not even aware that it happened. Most writers, even if they are only writing an email message instead of a column in a major newspaper, have more respect for their words than Google does. Don't expect these writers to answer their Gmail.

My Name is Fernando Silva Villafuerte, I'm from Tenochtitlán, you know it as Mexico City, This is my frist time in a forum as a member, I'll try to help as many people as possible... And, excuse me for my poor english.

Well... that's a weird text to this forums...

I'm agree with spud, Any Password is simply, and simply the best.

Well, if you are using Win XP it's easy: Start ---> Control Panel ---> User's Accounts ---> (select Admin account or your main account) in the left list choose "Manage my passwords" (or something like that), a window with your passwords will pop up, now you can delete as many as you want. The menus could be different because my OS is in spanish.