jaclaz

And now, radio amplifier attack: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/03/23/hackers-can-unlock-and-start-dozens-of-high-end-cars-through-the/ Models that can be hacked Audi: A3, A4, A6 BMW: 730d Citroen: DS4 CrossBack Ford: Galaxy, Eco-Sport Honda: HR-V Hyundai: Santa Fe CRDi Kia: Optima Lexus: RX 450h Mazda: CX-5 Mini: Clubman Mistubishi: Outlander Nissan: Qashqai, Leaf Opel: Ampera Range Rover: Evoque Renault: Traffic Ssangyong: Tivoli XDi Subaru: Levorg Toyota: Rav4 Volkswagen: Golf GTD, Touran 5T https://www.adac.de/infotestrat/adac-im-einsatz/motorwelt/test_keyless.aspx jaclaz

Well, you can introduce a delay between the execution of the commands, *any* command without a definite output to the console would do. Usually a "ping to to self" is used, but to just slow down a little bit a loop, you can also insert another FOR /L loop FOR /L %%A IN (1,1,100) DO ( echo %random% FOR /L %%B IN (1,1,10) DO ( echo %random%>NUL ) ) jaclaz

I am then willing to translate "the new version is out and is on iscloud" to "somewhere on the internet". Mind you, it is perfectly OK , to NOT provide any definite location/link, but posting that in reply to this question; seems to me like being a non-reply. jaclaz

http://ss64.com/nt/for_l.html http://www.robvanderwoude.com/ntfor.php jaclaz

Hmmm. jaclaz

The Outlook I personally don't use since (say) 2001, the Search Indexer that anyone would normally disable and the Norton that shouldn't (IMNSHO) even come near a running system? All in all I would de-classify the issue from "surprising" to "normal" . I mean, if you are running a few resource hogs in background, it is not so improbable that one (or more than one) of them actually brings your system down to a crawl ... The issue may be now finding out if that amount of overhead in the I/O is the "normal" amount such tools are expected to create or if one of them is acting "queerly". jaclaz

It may depend on the exact Word (office) version, but there shuld be no problems with Autohotkey to replicate the key combos that "switch" between "corpus", header and footer. Or you could use a Word macro or keyboard shortcut, see: http://windowssecrets.com/forums/showthread.php/43955-Keyboard-shortcut-for-switch-headers-footers-(Win2K-Word-2000-9-0-6926-SP3) https://cybertext.wordpress.com/2008/01/25/update-fields-in-headers-and-footers/ http://www.techrepublic.com/article/take-a-shortcut-to-your-header-window-in-word/ jaclaz

What about CLS? http://ss64.com/nt/cls.html As a side note; I KNOW THAT I COULD DO IT LIKE : :b echo %random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random%%random% goto b BUT IT WONT STOP IF I DO IT LIKE THAT, SO I HAD TO DO IT THAT STYLE. IF ANYBODY OF YOU KNOWS HOW TO DO LIKE "WRITE IT 100 TIMES THEN GO ON THE NEXT COMMAND" PLEASE TELL ME it is a simple FOR /L loop FOR /L %%A IN (1,1,100) DO ( ECHO something ) jaclaz

The first screenshot (in safe mode) is "normal". The third screenshot is terrible. I would say that in your "full mode" you have a conflict of some kind (a driver or a background running task) How to find what it is may be a difficult question, check the driver, maybe you want to try re-installing the driver or check for an update version of it, but since it wrked before it is unlikely that a new version is needed, only maybe the current drive had some form of corruption. You could also try again on the "full" system after having reduced running services to a minimum and/or re-running the test with an eye on Task Manager resource usage and adding the columns "write" and "read" bytes (or whatever they are called). jaclaz

A batch was posted and deleted by accident, here it is it back: @ECHO OFF SETLOCAL ENABLEEXTENSIONS ENABLEDELAYEDEXPANSION SET Caption= ECHO Replace §'s with spaces ECHO. ECHO Drive§§Description§§§§§§§Size§§§§Volume Label FOR /F "tokens=1,2 delims==:" %%A in ('WMIC LOGICALDISK where "drivetype=2" get caption^,size^,volumename /format:list') DO ( IF NOT %%B.==. SET %%A=%%B IF DEFINED Caption IF %%A==VolumeName CALL :checkdata ) GOTO :EOF :checkdata SET %Caption%_Caption=§%Caption%:§§ SET %Caption%_Size=%Size% SET %Caption%_Volume=%Volumename%§§§§§§§§§§§ IF DEFINED %Caption%_Size ( call :truncatebytes %Caption%_Size ) ELSE ( SET %Caption%_Size=§§§§§§§§ ) ECHO !%Caption%_Caption!§§Removable disk§§!%Caption%_Size:~-8,8!§§!%Caption%_Volume:~0,11! GOTO :EOF :truncatebytes SET thisvar=!%Caption%_Size! SET thissize= SET units=TB GB MB KB FOR /L %%A IN (11,-3,2) DO ( SET thissize=!thisvar:~0,-%%A! SET unit=!units:~-%%A,2! IF "!thissize!"=="!thissize:~0,1!" SET thissize= IF DEFINED thissize SET %Caption%_Size=§§!thissize:~0,-1!.!thissize:~-1,1! !unit!&&GOTO :EOF ) GOTO :EOF jaclaz

Which I will translate to "at the time/date I did the search on google, in my localized results it came out as second result". Just for the record a google search result is not carved in stone, and can be in a different position (or be not there at all) in a subsequent search, and as well results may change depending on the location from which the search was originated, and will definitely vary when using "national" google sites (as opposed to google.com) and even from the same site and originating location on local OS/browser settings. jaclaz

It's official, PSA here: http://www.ic3.gov/media/2016/160317.aspx many, many pearls of wisdom in it. Particularly in the context of a risk of a Wi-Fi or however radio carried intrusion, I would like to cite/highlight: jaclaz

You are quoting an old post (and batch) by Steve6375 and Wonko (the Sane) already stated how likely he couldn't do much better, still this has nothing to do with the original question, which is about converting an Easy2boot stick to .iso (something the batch won't do or won't do correctly), as the scope of the batch is to create a grub4dos bootable .iso from a "plain" grub4dos bootable USB stick, AND: http://www.rmprepusb.com/tutorials/makegrub4dosiso jaclaz

You may want to ask the actual question and not a small part of it. (full disclosure, maybe I know what the actual question is, because we talked about it via PM). Remember, you want to reach a goal, express it, DO NOT divide the way you believe you can reach it in n little steps each disjointed from the previous one, there are several reasons for this, among them the fact that there may be "better" or "easier" ways to reach your goal, people doesn't know WHAT you are actually wanting to do, you may make an example for what you believe is the right approach which is either inaccurate or more simply "wrong" , so as soon as an answer will be given to you, you will come up with another question (because the answer is not suitable to your unknown goal) and then another question, and another question :ph34r:. You have a test1.cmd that creates text1.txt and a test2.cmd that creates text2.txt, yet, your code deals with two other files outputfile.txt and volname.txt, and there is no trace of text3.txt. So I have to assume that text1.txt is actually outputfile.txt and that text2.txt is volname.txt. I can provide you a perfectly valid answer to your question but that won't help you a little bit in getting near your GOAL, (this answers your question and example): @ECHO OFF SETLOCAL SET skip= SET /A Counter=0 FOR /F %%B IN ('TYPE test2.txt') DO CALL :merge %%B GOTO :EOF :merge FOR /F "%skip% tokens=*" %%A IN ('TYPE test1.txt') DO ( ECHO %%A %1&GOTO :out ) :out SET /A Counter+=1 SET skip=skip=%Counter% GOTO :EOF jaclaz

There are tens of "Manufacturer tool" versions, some may contain the needed configuration data, it is usually a hit and miss game (more misses than hits, unfortunately). Try seeing here SMI page: http://www.usbdev.ru/files/smi/ It is also possible (but EXTREMELY risky ) to edit/test different configurations, this is specific on Transcend: http://www.usbdev.ru/articles/a_smi/transcend_smi_marker/ There is a concrete risk of flashing *something* that may put the controller in a non-recoverable status, your mileage may vary. jaclaz

To be picky, as I am BTW, there is a single guy (authoritative and nice as he might be ) that stated that: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2008.07.windowsconfidential.aspx and at least another guy: http://technabob.com/blog/2007/04/01/windows-vista-easter-egg-discovered/ raises some doubts about the story. Futile as it might be as an exercise, it is at least *strange* that seemingly noone took some time in the last 7 or 8 years to (if not decrypt) at least find/locate the actual data chunk on the CD and document the finding. On the other hand we have several years of experience in dealing with the Windows XP setup process, and noone ever (AFAIK) found the *need* for setup to access these mythical 30 Mb of encrypted data (which if needed would have made - say - nlite or any other modification impossible). It is of course possible that a certain number of initial RTM CD's contained that data, but all in all it is not very credible, if anyone happens to have an original XP CD it would be nice if he/she could have a peek at it with a hex/disk editor and confirm or deny the existence of that data... jaclaz

Also: that would be: hxxp://www.msfn.org/board/topic/175325-forum-upgrade-bugs-and-errors-only/?page=4#comment-1120597 if the stupid WYSIWYG editor didn't post a senseless one line preview of it, instead of the link. jaclaz

Well, so you can now successfully control a million small R/C cars around a room with a microphone plugged in a PC. As a side note, and JFYI : http://queen-taurus.tumblr.com/post/79645918681 jaclaz

but you see, the above quote now is: <blockquote class="ipsQuote cke_widget_element" data-ipsquote="" data-ipsquote-timestamp="1458107676" data-ipsquote-userid="351666" data-ipsquote-username="nostaglic98" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic" data-ipsquote-contentid="174175" data-ipsquote-contentcommentid="1120646" data-cke-widget-keep-attr="0" data-widget="ipsquote" data-cke-widget-data="%7B%22classes%22%3A%7B%22ipsQuote%22%3A1%7D%7D"> <div class="ipsQuote_citation"> <div class="ipsQuote_contents ipsClearfix cke_widget_editable" contenteditable="true" data-cke-widget-editable="content" data-cke-enter-mode="1">ev <p> Bit of a rant, but I understand the premise behind "Death to Bullsh*t." I'm here to read, not to share random forum posts on Twitter, Farcebook, Google-Minus and so on, and so forth and such things. Again, I'm here to read, <strong>not</strong> look at 2016 "Abstract Forum Design" competitors. </p> <::after> </div> </blockquote> while in the "previous incarnation" of the board software it would have been <blockquote class="ipsBlockquote built" data-author="nostaglic98" data-cid="1120646" data-time="1458107676"> <p> Bit of a rant, but I understand the premise behind "Death to Bullsh*t." I'm here to read, not to share random forum posts on Twitter, Farcebook, Google-Minus and so on, and so forth and such things. Again, I'm here to read, <strong>not</strong> look at 2016 "Abstract Forum Design" competitors. </p> </blockquote> but really-really the above was a "translation" (BTW bi-directional conversion being evidently possible since the data is exactly the same) of: [quòte user="nostaglic98" post="1120646" timestamp="1458107676"] Bit of a rant, but I understand the premise behind "Death to Bullsh*t." I'm here to read, not to share random forum posts on Twitter, Farcebook, Google-Minus and so on, and so forth and such things. Again, I'm here to read, [b]not[/b]look at 2016 "Abstract Forum Design" competitors. [/quòte] It seems to me evident enough the utter importance of the new format, as it gives so much more possibilities - what they are, yet I know not, but they shall be the sellers of the Earth ... It is not much about 2016 "Abstract Forum Design", it is more about the 2016 "Senselessly Verbose Code Writing Context". jaclaz

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/03/researchers-say-faa-is-really-overblowing-risk-posed-by-small-drones/ 0.00000612 every 100,000 sounds like pretty much low. jaclaz

No, unfortunately those files are corrupt. SWM files are more or less similar to "spanned" .zip or .rar archives, you have a number of files of or below a given size (let's say 640 Mb as the size that would fit on a CD or 4700 Mb as the size that would fit on a DVD) and the last one is smaller. jaclaz

Those strange name folder are connected with shadow copies and/or restore points. The amount (and size) of the files may depend on specifc machine settings/preferences, though there are reports that sometimes the thingy doesn't work properly and needs to be re-initialized. Like: hxxp://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-performance/how-do-i-delete-huge-files-from-system-volume/2d31b256-2cb6-486e-af97-e6018f594581?page=1 If I were you I would try a hard disk benchmark run from a LiveCD or however minimal PE (or Linux) or with the disk connected to another computer, in order to separate hardware issues (if any) from software/driver/whatever ones. jaclaz

Well, same user as your quote made an even (IMHO) better post: jaclaz

Possibly not even a bug, BUT (sorry if I raise the issue, I know that the new thingy has put a heavy burden on your shoulders, xper): If you click on the Unread content, the "Stream" coming out will have a list of posts where a teeny-tiny (in the sense of reduced target to click on) star or dot on THE LEFT of the thread title will have the "right" link *like*: hxxp://www.msfn.org/board/topic/175325-forum-upgrade-bugs-and-errors-only/?do=getNewComment that will resolve to something *like*: hxxp://www.msfn.org/board/topic/175325-forum-upgrade-bugs-and-errors-only/?page=4#comment-1120591 while if you click on the actual thread title, the link is to: hxxp://www.msfn.org/board/topic/175311-ips-41-upgrade-issues/ i.e. first page of the thread. On the other hand if, once you have clicked on "UNread Comments" you go up (by clicking on Activity, on the top left, on Home > Activity > Unread Content) you open another "Stream", BUT this time the actual thread title will have a link to: hxxp://www.msfn.org/board/topic/175325-forum-upgrade-bugs-and-errors-only/?do=findComment&comment=1120591 which will as well resolve to hxxp://www.msfn.org/board/topic/175325-forum-upgrade-bugs-and-errors-only/?page=4#comment-1120591 It seems clear (to me) that this latter is what most people would want to get (going to the cited post and not to the thread) the "previous incarnation" allowed easier choice between going to the thread or to the last post in it. jaclaz

I know how they look as they look the same (actually only Trip's ones, I can see bphlpt's ones fine) in my Opera. The issue is most probably a combination of the browser you are using with the stupid board software (or whatever, like ad blockers, security suites, etc.). Try getting this (ENTIRELY PORTABLE and small sized, though possibly having some limits): http://www.qtweb.net/ and use it to browse the site, can you see those images with it? How do you think I managed to get the full link? jaclaz