Leaderboard

There was a patch released for 7 and Vista to fully support 4K, as in the ability to boot from them, but it got deleted very soon, probably they also made one for XP? https://news.softpedia.com/news/Improve-Windows-7-SP1-and-Vista-SP2-Compatibility-with-Advanced-Format-Disks-216563.shtml Nothing about 4Kn though.

Booting from such a drive, no. Storing allegedly pirated content, such as films, games and 2160p WebRips, on an external drive with 4Kn sectors, yes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Format

A lot of evidence on youtube. With 1050??? Which driver?

Nobody asked you to neglect your "career". BTW, no one has spoken of this, and it is not the issue here at all. But if you take the trouble to reproduce something I said, then it should correspond to what I said. And if you don't really understand it, you should either quote it verbatim as you have done now: Bingo! or simply not refer to it at all. P.S.: I think bragging about your "above-average salary", whatever that means and whoever cares, is rather inappropriate and doesn't belong here.

I think it is more something like that ... There was no alpha but a correlation coefficient r of r > 0.95 to express the almost perfectly linear correlation between two statistical variables, the user interest and the (actually my) willingness for publishing. If you want to refer to what I have stated, then please in a correct way. To put it in simple, non-mathematical terms, the greater the user interest, the greater my mood to publish something.

Ever heard of a typo? Happens even to the best. If you had read my posts carefully, you would have noticed that I had written it correctly in the post before: The part to which you refer came in the next post: If you're not interested in the content of my posts, and you're just looking for spelling mistakes, have fun with it! You will certainly find one or two more.

I'm glad to hear that. For me, the PMT - Process Mode Toggler is ideal for testing and comparing different things in both process modes with only two clicks in the same profile. At the moment, I have reverted to the last officially compatible version 1.46. But I will test the 1.56 version again. Thanks for the hint!

Just for clarification. I am not a self-proclaimed "mathematician" but just a mathematician. I have not announced anything here, but only mentioned it in passing. No more, no less. As part of my search for the cause of the spontaneous Thorium crashes, I formed a lot of hypotheses and had to unfortunately reject them. And I have investigated many things as part of my hypotheses. But so far without success.

Yep! A clean, genuine Windows XP Professional. Only the service pack SP3 and all post SP3 updates until 2014. POSReady stuff has never been applied to this partition.

Thanks for the nice compliment and for the tip! There is definitely nothing I wouldn't try to solve these crappy crashes. Strangely, Thorium works perfectly in my Windows XP SP3 POSReady installation, i.e., without any crashes. And there, these DLL files exist from the very first.

I tried both. The last try was native Thorium without anything. No extensions, no additional flags and no Chrome XP API Adapter from IDA-RE-things, following the main principle to go back to the roots if it doesn't work.

I can speak to whether Microsoft fixed this DESIGN FLAW with Vista, I had already answered. It was never there, to begin with. Looks like they implemented that "design" starting Win 7 (which I can't stand!). Strange! Weren't you the one who had recently upgraded? Allegedly.

In my experience, all those memory "saving features", including this one, and the infamous "refresh" only consume more RAM. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/507#issuecomment-2071376972

It sounds more like a bug, what other tools did you try, interesting?

Compulsive Behaviour

Executive Order

Malicious Activities