Leaderboard

I don't really care about it personally. I have to deal with it here and the other thing I mentioned but MSFN is based in Europe so we have to follow those rules. If MSFN wasn't an official fallback location that line wouldn't be there. It is only because MSFN has many EU members that I mention it. It seems standard practice that US sites don't care about those things, even if the forum software supports it.

If you are additionally using the Bypass Paywalls Clean filter usersrcipts, don't forget to also update them in your userscript manager!

Thanks for reporting! It is good that such changes are reported here. However, I already noticed the update issue. I'll first provide the changes via automatic update soon. Assets updated. The automatic update of uBlock Origin Legacy's assets can be triggered by the "Purge all caches" function.

Thanks for reporting! It is good that such changes are reported here. However, I already noticed the update issue. I'll first provide the changes via automatic update soon.

Yes, of course. These themes you linked to have never been compatible with Mypal 68.x but with the old Mypal 29.x. You have to look for themes compatible with Firefox 68.x (Firefox Quantum), for example, here: https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/themes/ But do not expect to find complete themes as it was the case in the legacy browsers! They are almost gone. Only light ones are still available. Regarding your issue, you seem to mix up legacy browsers like Pale Moon, New Moon and Mypal 29 with Quantum based browsers like Firefox 68 or Mypal 68. You can read more about that, for example, here: https://msfn.org/board/topic/183657-mypal-68-in-windows-xp-custom-buttons-and-extensions/ There, I have listed different ways to customise Mypal 68. And of course, you will also find information in many other threads here on MSFN and everywhere else in the WWW. Search for Firefox Quantum themes!

I don't have the installer anymore, sorry. I'll search the old HDDs with backups. I found these installers: Comodo Firewall 6.3.39949.2976: https://web.archive.org/web/20140202172445/http://downloads.comodo.com/cis/download/installs/2000/standalone/cfw_installer.exe Comodo Firewall 6.3.39542.2974: https://download.comodo.com/cis/download/installs/2000/xml_binaries/cis/cis_setup_x86.msi or https://download.comodo.com/cis/download/installs/2000/xml_binaries/cis/cis_setup_x64.msi Here is the command to only install the firewall from the MSI file: msiexec /I cis_setup_x86.msi INSTALLANTIVIRUS=0 INSTALLFIREWALL=1 FWFEATURES=1 THREATCASTFEATURE=2 SETOURDNSSERVER=0 CIS_LANGUAGE_ID=1033 Comodo Firewall 6.3.39106.2972: https://web.archive.org/web/20131116044454/http://downloads.comodo.com/cis/download/installs/2000/standalone/cispremium_installer.exe Comodo Firewall 6.2.23257.2860: https://web.archive.org/web/20130826060441/http://downloads.comodo.com/cis/download/installs/2000/standalone/cfw_installer.exe

Correct! You can even block external fonts via the dashboard settings page of uBO or via the content settings page of the browser but in these cases, for all websites. Here is your website called up in New Moon 28 when blocking the external font via uBlock Origin Legacy:

@genieautravail My advice to you is to find the last XP-compatible installer of SUPERAntiSpyware Free Edition and install the programme. Then try to update the programme using the internal updater.

Personally, I am using the Professional X Edition which is working fine under Windows XP. I have installed the latest verson 10.0.1266 on my Windows XP machine (via the internal updater). Look at my screenshots! However, I didn't try the Free Edition. I thought it was also XP-compatible, especially if the Professional X edition is still XP-compatible. But first, try an older installer version from here: https://www.filepuma.com/download/superantispyware-17/versions/ I would try the version SUPERAntiSpyware 10.0.1250 first as I had compatibility problems with the version 10.0.1252 I already reported here. Maybe, only the installer of the more recent versions is no longer XP-compatible.

One entry of my internal list of security programmes is Comodo. I already wrote about Comodo Antivirus in the old antivirus thread: https://msfn.org/board/topic/177099-which-antiviruses-are-known-for-a-fact-to-be-working-on-xp-sp3-as-of-2019/?do=findComment&comment=1241826 https://msfn.org/board/topic/177099-which-antiviruses-are-known-for-a-fact-to-be-working-on-xp-sp3-as-of-2019/?do=findComment&comment=1241854 Is anyone here who has been using Comodo Antivirus or Comodo Internet Security under Windows XP in the last time? I need information, user experiences and test results together with the name and the number of the used version. It is particularly important how up-to-date these versions still are with regard to programme and virus definitions updates. It would also be interesting to know whether the programmes for Windows XP that are still advertised on the Comodo websites are actually XP-compatible and still work today. Here is a link: https://antivirus.comodo.com/security/windows-xp-free-antivirus.php In any case, my research from last year revealed that the last error-free, XP-compatible release of Comodo Antivirus was the version 12.0.0.6818. However, I don't know whether it is still working today or not. BTW, Comodo Firewall will also be looked at. But only at a later date.

Most antimalware scanners have problems with multi-packed archives. Personally, I never scan archives. It takes far too long on my old computer. I only scan archives when I unpack them and really need the files they contain. Regarding multi-packed archives I don't like them and usually avoid downloading such files. The method of multiple packaging has always been a strategy for hiding and foisting malware on the user of such files. Download sources that use this strategy are generally dubious.

Scam

scat

Stag

Neither this browser, nor this topic are only limited to XP, I don't use XP (most of the time). Where do you get the stats about the "whole" world? Link to a reputable source, please.

I'm sorry, I don't see another one, is it that better?

Thank you all, the issue is no more, thanks to @Dixel and his driver 348.12! NVIDIA System Information report created on: 11/16/2023 11:13:14 System name: KARLA-PC [Display] Operating System: Windows Vista (TM) Business, 64-bit (Service Pack 2) DirectX version: 11.0 GPU processor: GeForce GTX 780 Ti Driver version: 348.12 Direct3D API version: 11 Direct3D feature level: 11_0 CUDA Cores: 2880 Core clock: 875 MHz Memory data rate: 7000 MHz Memory interface: 384-bit Memory bandwidth: 336.00 GB/s Total available graphics memory: 6968 MB Dedicated video memory: 3072 MB GDDR5 System video memory: 0 MB Shared system memory: 7695 MB Video BIOS version: 80.80.34.00.2A IRQ: Not Used Bus: PCI Express x16 Gen3 Device ID: 10DE 100A 19DA 1314 Part Number: 2083 0030 [Components] nvui.dll 8.17.13.4812 NVIDIA User Experience Driver Component nvxdsync.exe 8.17.13.4812 NVIDIA User Experience Driver Component nvxdplcy.dll 8.17.13.4812 NVIDIA User Experience Driver Component nvxdbat.dll 8.17.13.4812 NVIDIA User Experience Driver Component nvxdapix.dll 8.17.13.4812 NVIDIA User Experience Driver Component NVCPL.DLL 8.17.13.4812 NVIDIA User Experience Driver Component nvCplUIR.dll 8.1.820.0 NVIDIA Control Panel nvCplUI.exe 8.1.820.0 NVIDIA Control Panel nvViTvSR.dll 6.14.13.4812 NVIDIA Video Server nvViTvS.dll 6.14.13.4812 NVIDIA Video Server nvDispSR.dll 6.14.13.4812 NVIDIA Display Server NVMCTRAY.DLL 8.17.13.4812 NVIDIA Media Center Library nvDispS.dll 6.14.13.4812 NVIDIA Display Server PhysX 09.15.0428 NVIDIA PhysX NVCUDA.DLL 8.17.13.4812 NVIDIA CUDA 7.0.41 driver nvGameSR.dll 6.14.13.4812 NVIDIA 3D Settings Server nvGameS.dll 6.14.13.4812 NVIDIA 3D Settings Server

https://archive.org/details/icafe-winxp-9.00.300.3010-beta1-br294594-sep24

Greeting top you, too! The service is not big, it's local. My profile is under constant and personal surveillance by the supervisor Tripredacus. I asked what could have triggered his attention many times. I asked the supervisor what post, word, text was not to his taste, yet he didn't point out to such. As he couldn't give me a clear answer, I'll not attach links to commercial sources, if you're not satisfied with my answer, please contact the supervisor Tripredacus and redirect the question there.

New drivers are a scam. I now have a Keppler card (link) and old driver 352.94 gives me much better fps with Injustice 2, Injustice 2 (link) is a 2018 game! Who would have thought... Driver from this tutorial is also much better than the new ones.