glentium Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 (edited) Using the latest stable, 1.4.2attached is my HFSLIP.LOGassistance is much appreciated! HFSLIPLOG.zip Edited April 18, 2007 by glentium Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 Do you know how to check the version of hhctrl.ocx in your SOURCESS folder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glentium Posted April 18, 2007 Author Share Posted April 18, 2007 I checked the version of hhctrl.ocx in my SOURCESS folder by expanding it, it's 5.2.3790.2847 which should be correct, according here: KB935448. yet, WU is complaining that I need that update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_guy Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 I checked the version of hhctrl.ocx in my SOURCESS folder by expanding it, it's 5.2.3790.2847...which is the same file version that's included in KB928843. Is there any way to keep the file from KB935448 if both updates are included?the_guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boooggy Posted April 18, 2007 Share Posted April 18, 2007 wu needs all the registry entries from this update....look in the hotfix inf for those...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 (edited) ...which is the same file version that's included in KB928843. Is there any way to keep the file from KB935448 if both updates are included?The file in KB935448 has a newer date on it (April 2nd vs Jan 23rd) so HFSLIP should pick up the one you want. It isn't doing that?wu needs all the registry entries from this update....look in the hotfix inf for those......HFSLIP makes Windows setup install the [Product.Add.Reg] section. I don't see any other registry additions.I just tested this in a VM and everything seems to be fine. Windows Update is not complaining and all registry entries are correct.Glentium -- Do you have a Realtek High Definition chip? Edited April 19, 2007 by Tomcat76 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glentium Posted April 19, 2007 Author Share Posted April 19, 2007 (edited) Yup, I do have a Realtek HDA...edit: thought it might help but even with the latest Realtek HDA Drivers, WU still complains about 935448... Edited April 19, 2007 by glentium Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted April 19, 2007 Share Posted April 19, 2007 I was thinking that maybe the Realtek drivers install an older version of the hhctrl.ocx file.I'll need a computer with a Realtek chip before I can say more on this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glentium Posted April 20, 2007 Author Share Posted April 20, 2007 I checked the hhctrl.ocx installed in SYSTEM32 and DLLCACHE, both are version 5.2.3790.2847,Realtek drivers does not even contain hhctrl.ocx file, though i am not 100% sure as i can't extract data1.cab and data2.cab included in the Realtek driver package. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glentium Posted April 27, 2007 Author Share Posted April 27, 2007 I'm still clueless as to why WU is complaining about this.Tried installing KB935448 through SVCPACK method (all others are HFSLIPed) and, as should be expected, no complains from WU. checked the installed hhctrl.ocx with the installed one if HFSLIPed, and they are exactly the same.Maybe I can safely ignore WU as I'm sure I have the correct hhctrl.ocx and I do have the latest Realtek drivers (1.65) which is not affected by the problem as mentioned in the KB article... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted April 27, 2007 Share Posted April 27, 2007 Still haven't had access to a machine with a Realtek chip, I'm afraid. The only thing I can do is install the hotfix manually somewhere and check if anything is done under the hood (like with IE7). I'll be back... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glentium Posted April 28, 2007 Author Share Posted April 28, 2007 thanks Tomcat! very much appreciated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now