ChrisKuhli Posted November 23, 2007 Posted November 23, 2007 (edited) Using installshield maybe not so good if used on non-iso Windows (e.g. asian language) - might be reason for some unfamiliar errors as also in my package…btw although cX2K is stagnated at moment i've a good reason to push its old topic and bind it on my signature website - reason is beginning 2ize development which will be the new base for that! Edited November 23, 2007 by ChrisKuhli
giarc Posted November 24, 2007 Posted November 24, 2007 hi, nice pack.out of curiosity I tried integrating it into the source for an unattended setup.seems to work fine, however when I get to the login screen I cannot figure out how to login as there are no user names to click.I have not as yet incorporated any usernames in my unattended setup, so only using administrator.Any ideas? am I just being dense thanks
ChrisKuhli Posted November 25, 2007 Posted November 25, 2007 (edited) hi, nice pack.out of curiosity I tried integrating it into the source for an unattended setup.seems to work fine, however when I get to the login screen I cannot figure out how to login as there are no user names to click.I have not as yet incorporated any usernames in my unattended setup, so only using administrator.Any ideas? am I just being dense thanksHmm... i hope you don't mean my pack (in Windows 2000) i don't develop (with) it yet... @All: If you have no problem what my sources http://chriskuhli.de/x2k/cX2K.rar containing try a bit debugging Edited November 25, 2007 by ChrisKuhli
damian666 Posted November 26, 2007 Author Posted November 26, 2007 @giarc, you have to type the administrator name man, and no it has nothing to do with my pack, but with your unattended options.@gendouhydeist, that is because the revolutionspack by tihiy is not integrated in the cd setup, and the debug option is executed by the "vistapack.exe debug" option, so no "" on the debug switch.log will be in the vistapack installer folder.thanx mandamian666
Tarun Posted November 29, 2007 Posted November 29, 2007 damian,Under Windows XP, what are you using for taskbar transparency?
ChrisKuhli Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 Hello Tarun Damian uses TBar in his pack for the transparency of Taskbar!Chris
damian666 Posted November 30, 2007 Author Posted November 30, 2007 (edited) yes, thats right man, Tbar is created by squeeto, and it works fine!!try it out!!and for the rest of you guys, the new version of the pack is now in the test fase, and probably done next week!!see you soon.damian666 Edited November 30, 2007 by damian666
X'tyfe Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 you may wish to replace that vista drive icon thing with this:http://drvicon.sourceforge.net/it looks to be alot better
gendouhydeist Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 you may wish to replace that vista drive icon thing with this:http://drvicon.sourceforge.net/it looks to be alot bettercool much smaller than the vistapack vista drive
X'tyfe Posted November 30, 2007 Posted November 30, 2007 the best part is that it doesnt need a service running and sucking memory to do its thing
ChrisKuhli Posted December 1, 2007 Posted December 1, 2007 (edited) the best part is that it doesnt need a service running and sucking memory to do its thingI've could have a look on the new Beta of the next major version Very nice but your suggestion(s) will be then in Vistapack 2.1 Beta *I* hope that damian666 will be in future (re-)enable support for installation patching, and then unattended Edited December 1, 2007 by ChrisKuhli
damian666 Posted December 3, 2007 Author Posted December 3, 2007 ok, listen up guys, i checked it out, and i have to disagree with you guys.plesae run the current vdrive and the one that you guyus told me about.on my pc, the current vrive uses 356 kb of memory.and that new one uses 3.156 kb.which is much more...and maybe you dont see it in the tasklist, but look at the first tab, there it is...so it runs in the background, jus like the old one...check it out man.damian666
X'tyfe Posted December 3, 2007 Posted December 3, 2007 indeed you are right not sure what happened before, but there it is
damian666 Posted December 5, 2007 Author Posted December 5, 2007 ok, so you understand that i wont replace it with that one right?it would n't make sense so..damian666
damian666 Posted December 10, 2007 Author Posted December 10, 2007 This post is closed , check the new postdamian666
Recommended Posts