rik Posted October 16, 2003 Posted October 16, 2003 Ive sed dis once and ill say it again WHO?>!Try searching Google, Young One...
DataMiner Posted October 18, 2003 Posted October 18, 2003 Tangerine Dream except the years 1987 thru 1998
techguy21801 Posted October 21, 2003 Posted October 21, 2003 there's too many choices.... well.let's seepink floydled zepplinLynyrd Skynyrd
Renjit Posted October 31, 2003 Posted October 31, 2003 This is a tough question. Here's my top fivePink FloydAerosmithACDCTom Petty and the heartbreakersThe Who
sedative Posted November 10, 2003 Posted November 10, 2003 The Beatles. Case closed.edit: Oh, hello old thread. Sorry for the late bump.
Carmon Posted November 11, 2003 Author Posted November 11, 2003 sedative Posted on Nov 10 2003, 06:18 PM The Beatles. Case closed.edit: Oh, hello old thread. Sorry for the late bump. defo
un4given1 Posted November 11, 2003 Posted November 11, 2003 Top 3:Stabbing WestwardNine Inch NailsTool
sedative Posted November 11, 2003 Posted November 11, 2003 Perl JamToolPink FloydI can somewhat agree with Pearl Jam being there. They pretty much created grunge music along with Nirvana and a few others.I agree with Pink Floyd being there because, well, they're Pink f***ing Floyd.But Tool? Nothing against them; I love them like the next guy, but I just don't understand how you can group Tool with the other two. I'm not trying to flame you or anything, I just don't get it.
grunge Posted November 11, 2003 Posted November 11, 2003 Perl JamPearl jam are crap...Nirvana are way better
FthrJACK Posted November 11, 2003 Posted November 11, 2003 True i thought the same when i posted it, they havent been well known for long really. They are a **** good band tho, my other choice was metalica.. but lets face it, they suck a** now. Stones... mmm Theres a load of bands id like to add up there really, but i know...Perl JamThe KinksPink Floydbeter? no? eat me then! and Kurt Cobain only knew 3 chords, was a junkie, wife beater, and killed himself like the loser he was, hardly someone to look upto. Nirvana where good sure... but i dont think they where as good as other bands at the time, they just got more coverage because of their punk attitude.
sedative Posted November 11, 2003 Posted November 11, 2003 and Kurt Cobain only knew 3 chords, was a junkie, wife beater, and killed himself like the loser he was, hardly someone to look upto. Nirvana where good sure... but i dont think they where as good as other bands at the time, they just got more coverage because of their punk attitude.I agree. I think Nirvana is a noteworthy band because of the way they revolutionized music as opposed to their talent. Kurt also said that he was a horrible guitar player. PS: The Kinks suck lol
FthrJACK Posted November 11, 2003 Posted November 11, 2003 The Beatles where a boy band. end of story.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now