wizardofwindows Posted July 27, 2005 Posted July 27, 2005 a friend ask me is a genuine P2-400mhz faster than a celeron 400?im not sure anyone know? thxz in advance.
Martin Zugec Posted July 27, 2005 Posted July 27, 2005 Of course regular pentium is faster then celeron...
Xanin Posted July 27, 2005 Posted July 27, 2005 'tis indeed faster. They tend to use celerons in laptops as far as I know. Hmm...I always get reminded of a certain vegetable when someone says 'celeron'.....
mjc Posted July 27, 2005 Posted July 27, 2005 a friend ask me is a genuine P2-400mhz faster than a celeron 400?im not sure anyone know? thxz in advance.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>A Celeron 400 is a P2 400 with less L2 cache, thus it can only be slower.
interminded Posted July 27, 2005 Posted July 27, 2005 I read a test a couple of years ago, where it stated that the difference between them in speed is in reality about 5 %.Depends off course on some other factors, but 5 % isn't really that much.
Zxian Posted July 27, 2005 Posted July 27, 2005 I read a test a couple of years ago, where it stated that the difference between them in speed is in reality about 5 %.Depends off course on some other factors, but 5 % isn't really that much.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>That really depends on what kind of applications you're doing. With a lot of number crunching, large caches help a lot, since you're not always running to memory or the hard drive for more information. Man I love my Pentium-M (1MB L2) CPU...
Nerwin Posted July 27, 2005 Posted July 27, 2005 Yes 100% Faster than a celeron, Any cpu is faster than a celeron Belive me i know
Zxian Posted July 27, 2005 Posted July 27, 2005 Yes 100% Faster than a celeron, Any cpu is faster than a celeron Belive me i know<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Nope... Celerons are faster than the 286... And the new Celeron D's aren't that bad actually. For an entry level CPU they're pretty decent.
Nerwin Posted July 27, 2005 Posted July 27, 2005 (edited) But a p4 is faster than celeron am i right? Edited July 27, 2005 by computerMan
Zxian Posted July 27, 2005 Posted July 27, 2005 Well... Hz for Hz, yes...the P4 is faster than Celeron. This is because the Celeron typically has a smaller cache than the P4.
Technoguy Posted July 28, 2005 Posted July 28, 2005 (edited) heh zxian i have heard that new celeron d's have quite a large amount of cache just a bit slower than P4.btw what's a l2 cache? Edited July 28, 2005 by Technoguy
Agi Posted July 28, 2005 Posted July 28, 2005 if I remember correctly Pentium-2 has half-speed cache, and although the celeron has less cache it runs full-speed, so the performance difference is negligable.
Zxian Posted July 28, 2005 Posted July 28, 2005 heh zxian i have heard that new celeron d's have quite a large amount of cache just a bit slower than P4.btw what's a l2 cache?<{POST_SNAPBACK}>The new Celeron D's are still going to be slower than their comparatively clocked P4 counterparts, but they are going to get a boost in L2 cache sizes.For a little more explanation on L2 caches - LinkIt's amazing what a Google search can bring up.
Technoguy Posted July 29, 2005 Posted July 29, 2005 well yeah for same mhz p4 is gonna burn celeron as nethin
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now