AMDs, what is the differnece in the names? Clawhammer, San Diago, Venice, NewCastle, and Winchesters?

Is there a performance gain in one over another?

Edited July 16, 200521 yr by lostincyberspace2007

Google is your friend.... so is wikipedia...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athlon_64

I was hoping on personal insite... lol, but this will do... anything else?

Google is your friend.... so is wikipedia...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athlon_64

So it looks like the San Diago is the newest, and possible the best?

Edited July 16, 200521 yr by lostincyberspace2007

its the newest and best single core

this is a list by the latest amd's

1.manchester/toldedo <--dual cores

2.san diego

3.venice

@ ripken204: On the dual cores, which would u prefer? Manchester or Toldedo?

toledo b/c they have 1mb cache per core equaling 2mb total, the manchester have 512kb per core

for the best performance:price ratio the 4400 is the best

the 4400 and 4800 are toledo's

the 4200 and 4600 are manchester's

and there will be a 3800 with the manchester core coming in the begining of august

wow.. very mismatched... lol

4200 Manchester, 4400 Toledo, 4600 Manchester, 4800 Toledo

Which one to buy?

the 4400

I'm gonna get that one once i get my money...lol... i mean when i work

@rip what's the 939 series of AMD 64x then?

Well at what i am looking at I think everything but the Manchester and Toldeo.... But correct me if im an wrong Ripken204.

@rip what's the 939 series of AMD 64x then?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

everything listed in the 1st post plus the dual cores are s939 with the exception that newcastle is socket 754 and 939

Edited July 17, 200521 yr by ripken204

@Rip: Then whats are the minor differnece in the Dual-Core and the Single-Core then? Other than the major obvious!

there are no differences between them except the obvious, and that obvious just lets u multitask way better and thats it

Edited July 17, 200521 yr by ripken204

lol