sailorsonic Posted April 12, 2005 Posted April 12, 2005 Over at the Neowin forums i ran into this topichttp://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=305221they suggested replacing the nt boot loader of 2k with that of xp to speed up the booting process. after some looking on the web i was able to do it. it does help. it does boot faster than it did before, as in getting to the logo faster. the two files I replaced are ntdetect.com and ntldri would say about a 5 seconds faster. Try it out on your test machines and let me know if it works for you and how much faster it boots
sailorsonic Posted April 14, 2005 Author Posted April 14, 2005 I have tried it in 4 more machines, so far no problem and same effect . it boots to the logo almost instantly. I was also able to do this without going into safe mode.Edit:Just back with more to report, I've installed this on as many 2k boxes as i could only, no set backs yet, all works fine and boot times are shorter.Please tell me if you have tried it and your impressions on it. I'd really like to know, thanks
sailorsonic Posted April 23, 2005 Author Posted April 23, 2005 No one else tried it? Here I was expecting to hear your stories if it worked for you. Come on guys I just wanted to know if i helped ya at all
Martin Zugec Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 I am using this for a long time, beginning with NT boot mediums, when I noticed w2k is loading much faster using XP ntloader and ntdetect...
BigDaddy Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Could some1 tell me which 2 files I must replace and where to look for them?
jaclaz Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Yes, you need to overwrite (AFTER having made a BACKUP, and IF you are sure you have an alternative way to boot the machine), the following two files:NTDETECT.COMNTLDR(you can get them from any already installed XP, and, if I recall correctly they are even between the files in SP2)I have read some reports that the files must be in the SAME language than the original install, but I cannot confirm it, italian and english mix well, cannot say for other languages.See my post here:http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=33030for more info on the NT/2k/XP boot process.jaclaz
bober Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 i tried it on a p1 233 running win2k pro. BIG improvement. think i'll try on a NT4 box.
Martin Zugec Posted April 24, 2005 Posted April 24, 2005 Not sure, but it shouldnt work on NT4 - one great way to use this is creating NT boot disc - just COPY ntldr, boot.ini and ntdetect.com to cd/floppy and thats all, you will be able to boot to windows from boot medium. I use it together with modified boot.ini, that will allow me to attach debugger
sailorsonic Posted April 25, 2005 Author Posted April 25, 2005 Holy crap, I just realized after reading my first post again that I didn't tell what two files they are, I feel like such a dumb butt , sorry guys I guess I must of been out of it. Thanks to for poiting that out and telling everyone the files.
bachikho Posted July 25, 2005 Posted July 25, 2005 instead of this, try install IAA 4 intel chipset and via 4in1 4 via chipset will force win2k boot much more faster!
TheBorg[NL] Posted July 26, 2005 Posted July 26, 2005 (edited) Works great thanks.Someone tried dropping those files in de I386 directory of the installation CD?I will give it a shot tomorrow.-edit-It works fine. Edited July 27, 2005 by TheBorg[NL]
BigDaddy Posted November 10, 2005 Posted November 10, 2005 Used Win2k3 Sp1's and also worked like a charm. For some reason my WinXP installation doesn't have NTDETECT.COM.Any1 know why=?
jaclaz Posted November 11, 2005 Posted November 11, 2005 Used Win2k3 Sp1's and also worked like a charm. For some reason my WinXP installation doesn't have NTDETECT.COM.Any1 know why=?Look harder (maybe unchecking "Hide System files") , it has to be there or it won't boot.jaclaz
BigDaddy Posted November 12, 2005 Posted November 12, 2005 OPs. forgot to update this page. For some unknown reason I dont see the file thru network although I see everyother hidden files. I checked on the machine and the file is ofcourse there.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now