MCT Posted December 22, 2004 Posted December 22, 2004 i was reading somewhere someone said the 16MB cache SATA drives are as good if not better in speed as the 10k RPM drives, any1 know if they are or arent? first hand ?
puntoMX Posted February 27, 2005 Posted February 27, 2005 It just can cashe more small files, but it isn´t faster then a 10k drive (looking at access times and so).Where is your info comming from?
oofki Posted February 27, 2005 Posted February 27, 2005 I am not sure, I read awhile ago that a 8mb cache vs a 2mb cache is a 30% increase in speed from what i remeber. I do not think that cache could make up for the rotation speed of a hard drive though. I think it would make a differance but would not be faster than a 10k drive.
puntoMX Posted February 27, 2005 Posted February 27, 2005 30% Increase in speed? With read / writes of small blocks yes, but in general you will not even notice it I think. Most of the large caches are just hypes .
oofki Posted March 2, 2005 Posted March 2, 2005 Roger that but like I said it helps but nothing can be compared to how fast it spins.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now