Markymoo Posted May 11, 2004 Posted May 11, 2004 Which do i do first jdeboeck slimming down or use XPCREATE first or after?
GreenMachine Posted May 11, 2004 Posted May 11, 2004 XPCREATE run and tested first ... then send your error messages to jdeboeck!
GrimSage Posted May 11, 2004 Posted May 11, 2004 i did the reduce first then did xpcreateinstall goes fine but i cant get xplode to eork correctly....
Markymoo Posted May 13, 2004 Author Posted May 13, 2004 @GreenMachineslimming down the workload again i c hehe just kidding
GreenMachine Posted May 13, 2004 Posted May 13, 2004 Workload, and headaches ... Anything is, of course, doable. Everything is not.
Jazz Posted May 17, 2004 Posted May 17, 2004 Well so finally whats the answer ? i'm using nlite for removing junk outta my sources..Bye,Jazz
Alanoll Posted May 17, 2004 Posted May 17, 2004 i would say use XPCreate first. One of teh hotfixes might add something back in, that you had already taken out.
swampy Posted May 18, 2004 Posted May 18, 2004 I tested running nlite before and after XPCREATE, both ended up the same, missing KB828741, KB835732 & Update Rollup 1 KB826939.Forget it.As GreenMachine keeps saying, always use a clean source for XPCREATE.I haven't said thanks yet, but thanks GM, XPCREATE is phantasmagorical!The only bugs I've seen have been XPCREATED by me:)
GreenMachine Posted May 18, 2004 Posted May 18, 2004 I was wondering when I would here something ... and probably not the last!'Welcome, swampy! Operator Error: Get's 'em every time ...
GrimSage Posted May 20, 2004 Posted May 20, 2004 I suggest reduce then xpcreate. that way hotfixes dont get accidentally removed...The big question is... Why does windows update think the hotfixes are needed but MBSA does not?
tarquel Posted May 20, 2004 Posted May 20, 2004 Maybe Microsoft need to update the engine behind Windows Update ...just a thought when msba was updated alot more recently than WU...N.
Alanoll Posted May 21, 2004 Posted May 21, 2004 I suggest reduce then xpcreate. that way hotfixes dont get accidentally removed...The big question is... Why does windows update think the hotfixes are needed but MBSA does not?maybe it's just me, but no one bothers to search. I've posted before why a few will show up after reducing source. They rely on components. I've also posted in the nLite thread why WU thinks they aren't there, while MBSA thinks they are.I suggest, XPCREATE then REDUCE. That way you have an updated source, and then it's removed. If the component is removed by REDUCE, then it won't get updated. But if removed first, XPCREATE doesn't know that, so it adds the files back, and then they are registered during setup and errors can arise depending on what it is.
GreenMachine Posted May 22, 2004 Posted May 22, 2004 I don't know if anyone has ever looked, but my I386\SVCPACK directory gets pretty heavy. I do also add files from the hotfixes that may be unbeknownst to the various sliming procedures. If anyone is interested, they are listed at the end of the TXTSETUP.SIF file.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now