we3fan Posted January 6 Share Posted January 6 (edited) Hi, I installed Youtube Downloader HD 5.4.3 (link) on my Win 7 SP1 32-bit PC, but it doesn't work properly. 360p YT video - downloads OK. 480p YT video - downloads both Video and Audio files separetely, and shows this: When I press "OK" both files are deleted, so 480p download is not successful. Do I need to install something additionally for 480p video to download and merge successfully? I also tried Youtube Downloader HD 5.0.1 and I got same results. (360p - OK, 480p - Not OK) What is the last version of Youtube Downloader HD for Win 7 32-bit? Edited January 7 by we3fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
we3fan Posted January 9 Author Share Posted January 9 http://www.youtubedownloaderhd.com/download.html says ver 5.4.3 is only for Win 7 64-bit, I hoped it would work on Win 7 32-bit also but it doesn't. So I think last version for Win 7 32-bit is ver 3.7 . Can someone confirm this? I didn't realize initially that they stopped development for Win 7 32-bit, and only continued developing for Win 7 64-bit, that surprised me a bit. Do many programs for Win 7 do that, or this is just a rare case? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mina7601 Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 7 hours ago, we3fan said: So I think last version for Win 7 32-bit is ver 3.7 . Can someone confirm this? Yes, it's the last version. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroSkipper Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 (edited) 9 hours ago, we3fan said: http://www.youtubedownloaderhd.com/download.html says ver 5.4.3 is only for Win 7 64-bit, I hoped it would work on Win 7 32-bit also but it doesn't. So I think last version for Win 7 32-bit is ver 3.7 . Can someone confirm this? I didn't realize initially that they stopped development for Win 7 32-bit, and only continued developing for Win 7 64-bit, that surprised me a bit. Do many programs for Win 7 do that, or this is just a rare case? Try the portable version! BTW, running Windows 7 32-bit is not really a good choice, unless your CPU is a 32-bit one only. I used Youtube Downloader HD in the past but there are better ones, even for Windows XP. And to answer your question, I fear 32-bit OSes and programmes have been in a dying process for a long time, see Linux. The number of programme manufacturers is growing who have already abandoned their 32-bit versions. Edited January 9 by AstroSkipper Update of content 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
we3fan Posted January 10 Author Share Posted January 10 Thanks guys. AstroSkipper, The portable version gives same results unfortunately. You have Win 7 64-bit? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroSkipper Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 7 minutes ago, we3fan said: Thanks guys. AstroSkipper, The portable version gives same results unfortunately. You have Win 7 64-bit? Yes! It is the laptop of my lady but I have to administrate it. I really don't know why. I decided to install Windows 7 Professional 64-bit and not 32-bit at that time. We all know Windows 7 is a more recent OS than Windows XP (which is still my favourite). When Windows 7 was released, a 64-bit CPU was already the standard. Therefore, no need to install Windows 7 32-bit on such hardware unless the CPU is really a 32-bit only model, which was no longer the standard at that time, though. BTW, did you try a bit older versions? For example, Youtube Downloader HD 4.2.1? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroSkipper Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 BTW, Youtube Downloader HD 3.7 is still working under Windows XP 32-bit (tested yesterday). Thus, it will certainly work under Windows 7 32-bit, too. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
we3fan Posted January 11 Author Share Posted January 11 Thanks. Yes, I also tried: 5.4.2, 4.4.2 and 4.2.1, but again same results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mina7601 Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 (edited) 8 hours ago, we3fan said: Yes, I also tried: 5.4.2, 4.4.2 and 4.2.1, but again same results. Well, then as I confirmed for you, 3.7 is the last version to work, unfortunately. Edited January 11 by mina7601 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now