Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Even if I try to FORCE a request, Ungoogled Chromium WILL NOT ALLOW ME TO.

No DNS record, no traffic at the router, no "broadcast".

I guess we can assume that was NOT THE CASE back in 2016.

image.png.0a1abb6054e623e34f49611c08cd1603.png


Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, D.Draker said:

"Okay, so now I can replicate one notification:

Go to https://mcdonalds.fi/

Get notification Blocked attempted request to: http://www.95tat1c.qjz9zk/generate_204

What browser gave you this?  I can not replicate on six different versions of Ungoogled Chromium.

All on Win10 LTSB (year 2016).

Edited by NotHereToPlayGames
Posted
12 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

What browser gave you this?  I can not replicate on six different versions of Ungoogled Chromium.

All on Win10 LTSB (year 2016).

It's not me, it's the guy from the github issue link, and I'm busy, you'll have to do without me. 

I listen to this marvellous vinyl and scroll down a huge list of my next ex-girlfriends, I don't use Ung.

https://msfn.org/board/topic/5150-what-are-you-listening-to/page/120/#findComment-1276706

Posted
1 hour ago, D.Draker said:

it's the guy from the github issue link

Not relevant than.  You made it sound (intentionally mislead?) like this was a modern browser throwing that warning TODAY, not a browser from 2016 posting a bug way back in 2016.

I cannot replicate this 2016 bug in a 2024 browser.  So no problem, no bug, no issue.  Nothing to see here.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuAKnbIr6TE

Posted (edited)
On 1/13/2025 at 4:30 PM, NotHereToPlayGames said:

Not relevant than.  You made it sound (intentionally mislead?) like this was a modern browser throwing that warning TODAY, not a browser from 2016 posting a bug way back in 2016.

I cannot replicate this 2016 bug in a 2024 browser.  So no problem, no bug, no issue.  Nothing to see here.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuAKnbIr6TE

Why do you always, and by always I mean *really always*, try to undermine me? Are you jealous? I'm trying to be friends here! I quoted the guy's post, if you don't see well, I'm not the one to blame.

I found articles from 2021, but I'm not gonna post them here since it's off-topic, and I've lost interest in communicating on this matter, if you wish to go on, make a dedicated topic, tag me,

and I'll *maybe* join.

EDIT:

Adieu.

Edited by D.Draker
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, D.Draker said:

Why do you always, and by always I mean *really always*, try to undermine me?

Disappointing that you see it that way.

2016/2021 ???  This is 2025 and you and I both use a browser from 2024.  Web browsers evolve MUCH FASTER than anything Darwin ever cited!

 

Let's play a little game, shall we?

I want to do everything that I can to get you to that 10k "rep".

Let's you and I reply back and forth CONSTANTLY so that your "friends" can easily find their daily allotment of "likes".

I want to see how fast we can get you to 10k.  All of MSFN has witnessed how this little scheme got you from 2k to nearly 7k in less than a year.

It would be one thing if USEFUL posts were being liked, but when *everything* is being liked no matter how *USELESS*, some days going back *YEARS*, it really does seem to me to be rather POINTLESS.

But it isn't against Forum Rules.  "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em."  Or is the Forum Rule that we agree to our terms in a PM versus a Post.  New to this Rep Farm, so I'm learning the rules as I go.

It's been going on for about a year or so WITH NO END IN SIGHT.  At least it feels like it's been that long.  If not, then the 2k to nearly 7k is even MORE impressive.  So I might as well JOIN, eh?

Edited by NotHereToPlayGames
Posted

I'll even start today.  I may not remember to hit the daily allotment every day.  But I'll start with a full allotment of likes for the day.  I should be able to find that daily allotment in this thread alone.  I want this to be EASY though, so please reply, reply, reply, reply.

So that I can easily hit the daily allotment again tomorrow...  and tomorrow...  and tomorrow...  "Creaps in this petty pace" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomorrow_and_tomorrow_and_tomorrow

Posted
15 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

Disappointing that you see it that way.

2016/2021 ???  This is 2025 and you and I both use a browser from 2024.  Web browsers evolve MUCH FASTER than anything Darwin ever cited!

 

Let's play a little game, shall we?

I want to do everything that I can to get you to that 10k "rep".

Let's you and I reply back and forth CONSTANTLY so that your "friends" can easily find their daily allotment of "likes".

I want to see how fast we can get you to 10k.  All of MSFN has witnessed how this little scheme got you from 2k to nearly 7k in less than a year.

It would be one thing if USEFUL posts were being liked, but when *everything* is being liked no matter how *USELESS*, some days going back *YEARS*, it really does seem to me to be rather POINTLESS.

But it isn't against Forum Rules.  "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em."  Or is the Forum Rule that we agree to our terms in a PM versus a Post.  New to this Rep Farm, so I'm learning the rules as I go.

It's been going on for about a year or so WITH NO END IN SIGHT.  At least it feels like it's been that long.  If not, then the 2k to nearly 7k is even MORE impressive.  So I might as well JOIN, eh?

I appreciate the effort, I do, thank you. But my purpose of being here is not to play games, and some people would wrongly assume, judging by your nickname, yours isn't either.

But then again, if you think I deserve, then OK, put a like.

I'm not scheming, I'm asking us both to respect the forum, and the readers, so let's stop with this off-topic.

Now, back ON Topic! People were getting the same as late as 2023! Namely, in 115 version, which isn't that far away.

I'll not quote, please read the whole thread.

https://github.com/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium/issues/1106#issuecomment-1666082882

 

Posted

Fair enough.  I assumed you to be the RING LEADER !!!  (You, Dixel, and AstroSkipper are clearly the BENEFACTORS, but that in and of itself reveals no RING LEADER.)

And I know I'm not the only one making that assumption.  But again, fair enough.

 

6 minutes ago, D.Draker said:

Thanks.  I'll have to read from home (currently at work).

But remember, I already tested this in v122 and the first "issue" was already debunked for v122.

I'll revisit from home and see if this "issue" is any different.

A bug report isn't always a bug.  Sometimes it's just "dumb" people not knowing what they are talking about, lol.  :ph34r:

Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, D.Draker said:

I went ahead and read from here at work.  Rolling on the floor in laughter.  Why?  Because this only affects LINUX.

I will bookmark the link for the next time that somebody (mainly an issue on other forums) tells me to ditch Windows and move to Linux.  :puke:

Not to be misread.  I enjoy Linux as a HOBBY PROJECT.  I installed Mint on my Acer Aspire One POS but the Acer Aspire One is still a POS even on Mint.  Win2k faired even worse than XP.  [But yeah, "off-topic".]

Edited by NotHereToPlayGames

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...