HoppaLong Posted November 22, 2019 Posted November 22, 2019 Because new software can wreck your operating system, I install everything in a virtual environment for testing purposes. If there are no problems, it becomes permanent. I uninstalled old Java and installed Java_v8.0_b131. My four Mozilla based browsers don't like this new build of Java: about:addons -> Plugins -> Java_v8.0_b131 -> It's listed with security risk warnings. "Always Activate" is greyed out on the menu. A message appears when installing Java 8.0. It's the usual warning about software not compatible with older versions of Windows. It seems to integrate smoothly with XP Pro_SP3. Is there a build of Java 8.0 that will work with XP without those Mozilla security warnings? Java isn't very useful when "Always Activate" is greyed out.
Dave-H Posted November 22, 2019 Posted November 22, 2019 Do you mean 231, that's the current Java 8 version? That works fine here on XP with Firefox 52.9.1 ESR, and there are no warnings in the plug-ins list about it.
Mathwiz Posted November 22, 2019 Posted November 22, 2019 (edited) IIRC, the last Java version with an installer that runs on XP was 8u151/8u152. But any Java version prior to the latest (8u231 as noted above) will trigger Mozilla's security warning. To get the latest version installed on XP, see these posts: On 4/23/2019 at 8:40 AM, Vistaboy said: That are good starting point. I made use of little registry mods. Generally in a fresh installed XP i always launched the last working XP installer (151/152) to install JAVA and then brutally extract the new .exe installer (jre-8u211-windows-i586.exe) and replace it in the programs file. The dream would be a little cmd workaround that automate the process to get last updated java. Expand On 4/26/2019 at 2:13 PM, TuMaGoNx said: if you have 7zip something like this: 7z e jre-8u211-windows-i586.exe Data1.cab 7z e Data1.cab installerexe 7z e installerexe .rsrc\1033\RCDATA\* && ren 5 new.patch && ren 6 old.zip && ren 7 bspatch.exe bspatch.exe old.zip core.zip new.patch 7z x -ojre core.zip del Data1.cab installerexe bspatch.exe old.zip core.zip new.patch for /r %f in (*.pack) do jre\bin\unpack200.exe "%~f" "%~dpnf.jar" && del "%~f" jre\bin\java.exe -Xshare:dump EDIT: no errorlevel check there oops Expand BTW if you put those commands into a .bat or .cmd file don't forget to double all the % characters in the for command. You may also want to use a capital F vs. a lowercase f. Edited November 22, 2019 by Mathwiz 1
HoppaLong Posted November 23, 2019 Author Posted November 23, 2019 Dave-H, a very smart "expert" at Super User suggested build 131 for XP. Now you know why I install everything virtually. I frequently make mistakes. Mathwiz, I'm slightly confused. You say the last build of Java with a working installer for XP is 151/152. Look at this page from Codec Pack -> System requirements: Windows XP/Vista/7/8/10 https://codecpack.co/download/Java_Runtime_Environment.html Maybe the folks at Codec Pack created an installer package that works with XP. I'm going to try it.
Dave-H Posted November 23, 2019 Posted November 23, 2019 (edited) I'd be interested to know if it works! I did look for Java offline installers which still worked on XP when the official ones from Oracle stopped working, but never found one. It is only the installer which doesn't work, the actual Java components still work fine on XP. You may well find that when you run the installer, nothing actually happens. If it does work, please let us know! EDIT: I've just actually downloaded that installer, and it is the standard offline installer from Oracle, which I can almost 100% say will not install on XP, whatever Codec Pack say! Edited November 23, 2019 by Dave-H Addition
Mathwiz Posted November 23, 2019 Posted November 23, 2019 On 11/23/2019 at 6:45 AM, HoppaLong said: Mathwiz, I'm slightly confused. You say the last build of Java with a working installer for XP is 151/152. Expand I was referring to the official Oracle installers. If you can confirm a 3rd-party installer for newer Java versions working on XP, by all means let us know! It would make staying up-to-date a lot simpler. But be aware that "System Requirements" pages don't always get updated when support for an older OS gets dropped. IOW, don't be surprised if it turns out not to install on XP after all.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now