Jump to content

Recommended Posts


Posted

The first is the best, followed by number 3 in my opinion. #2 was pretty good too of course, but the villians were pretty lame. 4 was okay. Nuclear man was pretty funny! All the comic book movies today are too serious. Batman? Ppppffftt.

Posted (edited)

1. Superman 1

2. Superman 2 - Richard Donner cut

3. Superman 3 - only because of partial humor thanks to Richard Pryor

everything else sucks

especially Man of Steel

Edited by vinifera
Posted (edited)

Superman III, had it all. Sups get drunk, goes mad, kidnaps a blonde open for anything and does it on the Statue of Liberty. Splits into two halves, and fights to death in a junk yard. Just to finalize everything, he takes on a grotesque feminist, physiologist, Lexx Luther cousin, who has become the madness of woman and machine. Drops off the legitimate hacker, who will eventually go on to commit more crimes. It was cartoony, comical, and just plain awesome to watch.

No Superman versus, his only surviving race. No Lexx breaking into his fortress of solitude. No anti-communist idea's asides playful pre-2001 terrorism. No go and save Kansas, for nanna. Just an awesome movie, I can re-watch over and over again, and no I am going to give my powers away for the sake of love.

You can not hate this movie. It was perfect in almost every way. The only way to make it better, would be to, include sex scenes, make him go after Lois, make Lexx sister use her woman parts, and weapons, and dunk Richard Pryor on an isolated tropical island, in the west Indies, or the Pacific, with a bunch of women who have barely seen a man of his kind, all wanting to be his wife, and leave him begging for a computer.

Superman scores three times, and takes out the trash three times.

................................................................................................................................................

New Superman....

So Lois Lane made it with the most fastest man on the planet, with the hardest hitting record, and she needs another man to fill that gap? Was is it, the bills? Superman could have crushed enough diamonds to make her a Gazillionare. I guess the lesson learned, is no woman can do without companionship, and is unwilling to wait. That happens, in real life, but this is Superman we are talking about, and Lexx gets abandoned on some island with a woman, and he is in shape. Which Superman is this continuing from "Lois and Clark" or "SuperBoy"????

Superman had the technology, he could even ask Batman to keep watch of Lois.

This Superman is depressing........Lexx Luther ends up on an island in the middle of nowhere.

Edited by ROTS
Posted (edited)

Superman III was better than I thought it would be (having never seen it before). They never played this one on TV. Popular opinion is that it wasn't very good, but when was popular opinion worth listening to? Superman III was the least action oriented of the bunch, but the most interesting to watch from a character standpoint. It was like a less serious version of Superman 1, yet it still had good cinematography, music, and was funny. The second movie is a little dry, doesn't excite me as much as when I was ten years old and the fight scenes were the main draw. If you're feeling nostalgic there's also the lesser known Supergirl (1984) movie starring Helen Slater. Now, there was one awesome looking babe, especially as the brunette Linda Lee;-)

Edited by LostInSpace2012
Posted

I liked how Superman Returns was pretty much a sequel to the 80s movies. I haven't seen the new one yet.

I have that Supergirl movie. Its kinda boring as compared to the filmmaking of the Reeves movies.

Posted

Supergirl is boring, but Helen was so hot :D

I liked S-Returns a bit, but villains were too childish (except Spacey)
and the whole young Superman and Lois with kid just annoyed me

I hate when they turn characters into youngsters its stupid

no wonder everything later turned into teenage crap

just look at Spiderman remakes, Star Trek remakes, now all we need is Iron man and Batman in teenage years

Posted

I dont' think they're as bland as today's movies. Back then, they had to be inventive with special effects and camera angles. Now, it all looks exactly the same... like a computer game.

Posted (edited)

not to mention that at least Chris Revee acted great and actually gave a **** about a role

unlike todays half crapped out actors that can't even produce one single emotion

Edited by vinifera

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...