compsavvy Posted January 2, 2011 Posted January 2, 2011 Another thing, just checked that the lanmanserver corresponds to server service of windows which is responsible for file sharing etc. I am generally not connected to a home network but use file/hardware sharing occassionally. However, I am always connected to a wireless access point used to connect to the internet. So, what do you suggest?? Should I disable the service?
MagicAndre1981 Posted January 2, 2011 Author Posted January 2, 2011 set the service starttyp to "manual - on demand" . Create a Task with the Taskscheduler which starts the service (command: C:\Windows\System32\net.exe, parameter start LanmanWorkstation) and run it on demand when you need the file sharing/network drives.I've explained this here in detail:http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=135472
compsavvy Posted January 2, 2011 Posted January 2, 2011 Thanks for your helpIt has helped greatly in improving the boot time by 3-4 secs
MagicAndre1981 Posted January 2, 2011 Author Posted January 2, 2011 Thanks for your helpYou're welcome
compsavvy Posted January 4, 2011 Posted January 4, 2011 @andreiI was trying to run boot trace with drivers flag on win 7 x64 but I got a BSOD. It appears there seems to be a issue with wpt.Do you know of any workaround??
MagicAndre1981 Posted January 4, 2011 Author Posted January 4, 2011 no. I emailed this to a MSFT employee who works on WPT, but he has not answered. Xperf is the CLI tool to start traces. The functions to start traces are in the Windows kernel. So it is an issue with Windows. Can you open the dmp with WinDbg and look if you also get the USB issue?
compsavvy Posted January 4, 2011 Posted January 4, 2011 I have downloaded debugging tools but dont know how to analyse the dump for the information you require
MagicAndre1981 Posted January 4, 2011 Author Posted January 4, 2011 in WinDbg press CTRL+S and add the symbol path:SRV*c:\websymbols*http://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbolsopen the dmp and run !analyze -v and post the output here.
compsavvy Posted January 4, 2011 Posted January 4, 2011 @andreiWhen I wanted a trace, windows gave me a bsod and when I wanted a BSOD, it gave me a trace.Somehow, I managed to perform a boot trace with drivers flag and without any bsod. I am attaching for your perusal. Two drivers seem to delay the boot- fltmgr.sys and bowser.sys whose details I could not findBy the way, the only thing I changed was upgrade the xbootmgr (I installed the windows 7.1 sdk(upgraded from ver 7.0)). So, see if it resolves the problem for you.http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17753307/bootlog2.7zP.S. I have observed that system activity is zero during the first 3-4 secs. No disk utilisation, no processor usage... What areyour comments on that??
MagicAndre1981 Posted January 4, 2011 Author Posted January 4, 2011 the trace is not complete. I can't see when it is finished.Read my trace guide and you see that the first steps is to load all boot relevat drivers. in oyur case it takes to load the SPTD driver (Demon tools) and the IDE controller. that's why you see no activity.You should really remove MSE and try a different tool. MSE is still slow.
compsavvy Posted January 5, 2011 Posted January 5, 2011 http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17753307/bootlog3.7zI uninstalled sptd.sys and updated my sata drivers and the boot process seems much more streamlined. Thanks for pointing it out.Now, I guess I would leave windows to itself.Did you have any success with the drivers flag??
MagicAndre1981 Posted January 5, 2011 Author Posted January 5, 2011 your Windows is much faster now. 23s to boot to the desktop and 32s to boot completely. This is fine.Have you found the crash dump (in C:\Windows\Minidump)? Can you share them? The MSFT employee replied and I need the STOP Code.
compsavvy Posted January 6, 2011 Posted January 6, 2011 Sorry, the minidump folder is empty. I could not reproduce the problem after the initial BSOD.http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/wptk_v4/thread/9fafc08b-e914-4094-960b-722f97a7f59bI think you might have seen this and this shows that you are right about the problem with the usb driver.
MagicAndre1981 Posted January 6, 2011 Author Posted January 6, 2011 yes, I know this topic. I replied to it, too.The MSFT employee looks at it to see more.
compsavvy Posted January 9, 2011 Posted January 9, 2011 BugCheck 1000007E, {ffffffffc0000005, fffff800031bde87, fffff880033bd128, fffff880033bc990}Probably caused by : usbvideo.sys ( usbvideo+3783 )Followup: MachineOwner---------3: kd> !analyze -v******************************************************************************** ** Bugcheck Analysis ** ********************************************************************************SYSTEM_THREAD_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED_M (1000007e)This is a very common bugcheck. Usually the exception address pinpointsthe driver/function that caused the problem. Always note this addressas well as the link date of the driver/image that contains this address.Some common problems are exception code 0x80000003. This means a hardcoded breakpoint or assertion was hit, but this system was booted/NODEBUG. This is not supposed to happen as developers should never havehardcoded breakpoints in retail code, but ...If this happens, make sure a debugger gets connected, and thesystem is booted /DEBUG. This will let us see why this breakpoint ishappening.Arguments:Arg1: ffffffffc0000005, The exception code that was not handledArg2: fffff800031bde87, The address that the exception occurred atArg3: fffff880033bd128, Exception Record AddressArg4: fffff880033bc990, Context Record AddressDebugging Details:------------------EXCEPTION_CODE: (NTSTATUS) 0xc0000005 - The instruction at 0x%08lx referenced memory at 0x%08lx. The memory could not be %s.FAULTING_IP: nt!IopPerfCompleteRequest+47fffff800`031bde87 488b5008 mov rdx,qword ptr [rax+8]EXCEPTION_RECORD: fffff880033bd128 -- (.exr 0xfffff880033bd128)ExceptionAddress: fffff800031bde87 (nt!IopPerfCompleteRequest+0x0000000000000047) ExceptionCode: c0000005 (Access violation) ExceptionFlags: 00000000NumberParameters: 2 Parameter[0]: 0000000000000000 Parameter[1]: ffffffffffffffffAttempt to read from address ffffffffffffffffCONTEXT: fffff880033bc990 -- (.cxr 0xfffff880033bc990)rax=09010100e4e1c000 rbx=fffffa80198f0b70 rcx=0000000000000000rdx=0000000000000000 rsi=0000000000000000 rdi=fffffa80198f0740rip=fffff800031bde87 rsp=fffff880033bd360 rbp=fffffa80198cbc80 r8=fffffa8003bd9058 r9=fffffa8004c31000 r10=0000000000401802r11=fffff880033bd400 r12=fffffa80198c7a00 r13=fffffa80198c8d60r14=0000000000000476 r15=0000000000000000iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz na po nccs=0010 ss=0018 ds=002b es=002b fs=0053 gs=002b efl=00010206nt!IopPerfCompleteRequest+0x47:fffff800`031bde87 488b5008 mov rdx,qword ptr [rax+8] ds:002b:09010100`e4e1c008=????????????????Resetting default scopeCUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT: 1DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: VISTA_DRIVER_FAULTPROCESS_NAME: SystemCURRENT_IRQL: 0ERROR_CODE: (NTSTATUS) 0xc0000005 - The instruction at 0x%08lx referenced memory at 0x%08lx. The memory could not be %s.EXCEPTION_PARAMETER1: 0000000000000000EXCEPTION_PARAMETER2: ffffffffffffffffREAD_ADDRESS: GetPointerFromAddress: unable to read from fffff800032f30e0 ffffffffffffffff FOLLOWUP_IP: usbvideo+3783fffff880`00dd3783 ?? ???BUGCHECK_STR: 0x7ELAST_CONTROL_TRANSFER: from fffff88000dd3783 to fffff800031bde87STACK_TEXT: fffff880`033bd360 fffff880`00dd3783 : fffffa80`198f0740 fffffa80`198cbc80 00000000`00000000 fffffa80`198ea3c0 : nt!IopPerfCompleteRequest+0x47fffff880`033bd410 fffffa80`198f0740 : fffffa80`198cbc80 00000000`00000000 fffffa80`198ea3c0 00000000`00000001 : usbvideo+0x3783fffff880`033bd418 fffffa80`198cbc80 : 00000000`00000000 fffffa80`198ea3c0 00000000`00000001 00000000`00000001 : 0xfffffa80`198f0740fffff880`033bd420 00000000`00000000 : fffffa80`198ea3c0 00000000`00000001 00000000`00000001 fffffa80`198cbd01 : 0xfffffa80`198cbc80SYMBOL_STACK_INDEX: 1SYMBOL_NAME: usbvideo+3783FOLLOWUP_NAME: MachineOwnerMODULE_NAME: usbvideoIMAGE_NAME: usbvideo.sysDEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 4b8f39d9STACK_COMMAND: .cxr 0xfffff880033bc990 ; kbFAILURE_BUCKET_ID: X64_0x7E_usbvideo+3783BUCKET_ID: X64_0x7E_usbvideo+3783I was able to replicate the problem. Most likely the issue is with webcam drivers
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now