Markymarc206 Posted December 10, 2008 Posted December 10, 2008 Hey guys, I have a problem with Vlite. To start it off I tried to reformat my computer and install Vista Ultimate 64bit and it just would not take. So I ended up having to reinstall my 32bit version. I saught help from MaximumPC and they told me to A: Either make a slipstream disk using vLite or Try installing with only 2GB install SP1 then install the rest of the ram. I guess the Vista RTM had a nasty bug when it was dealing with 4GB and 64bit Vista. I simply chose to try and make a slipstream because it was simple and didn't require a reformat. Anywho, I downloaded vLite 1.2 Final along with the x64 bit SP1 for Vista. I put in my x64 cd for vista allowed it to the files to the harddrive. Then it asked what I wanted to do. I chose Slipstream a service pack. And when I selected the location for the x64 version of SP1 it came back saying that I had the wrong version of the client. Is there two different versions of vlite for 32bit and 64bit? I am using 32bit trying to slipstream a 64bitThanks for the help, hopefully someone can get to me.
Markymarc206 Posted December 10, 2008 Author Posted December 10, 2008 45 views and nobody can help? Or what? Somebody has to know something. You dont have to be ignorant and ignore me.
Kelsenellenelvian Posted December 11, 2008 Posted December 11, 2008 (edited) You're the one being ignorant.There are THOUSANDS of visitors here everyday and maybe a handfull that can answer your question!AFAIK you cannot work on x64 Vista from within a x32 enviroment. Install the base x64 then work on making the x64 Vista w\SP1(I doubt you have the patience to do all this though) Edited December 11, 2008 by Kelsenellenelvian
ricktendo Posted December 11, 2008 Posted December 11, 2008 1 hour is hardly enough time to give for a response
Markymarc206 Posted December 11, 2008 Author Posted December 11, 2008 1 hour is hardly enough time to give for a responseYour right, that is why I waited 13 Kelsen, your right I have no patience but a simple answer like what you just said I am sure someone else might have known it. Maybe not, thanks for your response.
weEvil Posted December 11, 2008 Posted December 11, 2008 I didn't even know what this thread was about.Way to write a descriptive title.
jaclaz Posted December 11, 2008 Posted December 11, 2008 1 hour is hardly enough time to give for a response1 hour is hardly enough time to give for a responseYour right, that is why I waited 13 Kelsen, your right I have no patience but a simple answer like what you just said I am sure someone else might have known it. Maybe not, thanks for your response.Hey peeps, not to throw gasoline on the fire , but your math appears to be needing some improvements. As I see it:Yesterday, 11:03 AMToday, 12:17 AMIt looks more like 25 hours (and 14 minutes) jaclaz
spacesurfer Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 Today, 12:17 AMIt looks more like 25 hours (and 14 minutes) jaclazThat's odd. where did you get 12:17 am from. His second post was at 6:17 PM making it 13 hrs as he said.time zone difference?At one point it may have been yesterday and today but today it's yesterday and yesterday. anyhow, it's 13 hrs.haha... not to hijack this post with useless info.
jaclaz Posted December 12, 2008 Posted December 12, 2008 If it helps, now I see:First post:Dec 10 2008, 11:03 AMSecond Post:Posted Yesterday, 12:17 AMYour (spacesurfer's) post:Posted Today, 01:34 AMNow, if you see the 12:17 AM I see as 6:17 PM, it means that we have a six hours difference in our settings, you should also see first post at 5:03 PM of the DAY BEFORE. jaclaz
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now