MrCobra Posted May 2, 2008 Posted May 2, 2008 Yes, as long as the correct multiprocessor support was detected and loaded properly when you first installed it.
Idontwantspam Posted May 3, 2008 Posted May 3, 2008 it should work just fine. However, I've got to ask - why on earth are you running XP with no service packs?! Seems like a kind of crazy thing to do...
TravisO Posted May 3, 2008 Posted May 3, 2008 Seems like a kind of crazy thing to do...It's not crazy, it's just moronic. I'm sure he'll have some absurd excuse why... until his PC gets RPC exploited to hell and back.
Tripredacus Posted May 5, 2008 Posted May 5, 2008 it should work just fine. However, I've got to ask - why on earth are you running XP with no service packs?! Seems like a kind of crazy thing to do... My computer at home doesn't have any service packs installed... but I do have USB 2.0 functionality.
Idontwantspam Posted May 6, 2008 Posted May 6, 2008 But... why wouldn't you apply the service packs, other than just to be stubborn? It seems like a bad idea - MS stopped offering security updates to SP1 users about a year ago, I do't even know how long it's been since SP0 was supported...
Tripredacus Posted May 6, 2008 Posted May 6, 2008 But... why wouldn't you apply the service packs, other than just to be stubborn? It seems like a bad idea - MS stopped offering security updates to SP1 users about a year ago, I do't even know how long it's been since SP0 was supported... My computer was set up by my old company. Windows update does not work because it tries to look for a SUS which doesn't exist. However I have no problems with it and apply fixes only if i need to.
PC_LOAD_LETTER Posted May 6, 2008 Posted May 6, 2008 But... why wouldn't you apply the service packs, other than just to be stubborn? It seems like a bad idea - MS stopped offering security updates to SP1 users about a year ago, I do't even know how long it's been since SP0 was supported... My computer was set up by my old company. Windows update does not work because it tries to look for a SUS which doesn't exist. However I have no problems with it and apply fixes only if i need to.sorry but thats still not a valid excuse for running naked XP Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\WindowsUpdate]"DisableWindowsUpdateAccess"=-[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate]"ElevateNonAdmins"=-"TargetGroup"=-"TargetGroupEnabled"=-"WUServer"=-"WUStatusServer"=-"DisableWindowsUpdateAccess"=-[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate\AU]"AUOptions"=-"AUPowerManagement"=-"AutoInstallMinorUpdates"=-"DetectionFrequency"=-"DetectionFrequencyEnabled"=-"IncludeRecommendedUpdates"=-"NoAutoRebootWithLoggedOnUsers"=-"NoAutoUpdate"=-"RebootRelaunchTimeout"=-"RebootRelaunchTimeoutEnabled"=-"RebootWarningTimeout"=-"RebootWarningTimeoutEnabled"=-"RescheduleWaitTime"=-"RescheduleWaitTimeEnabled"=-"ScheduledInstallDay"=-"ScheduledInstallTime"=-"UseWUServer"=dword:000000000then just in case:@echo offnet stop wuauservnet start wuauservwuauclt /resetauthorization /detectnowworst case scenario download SP3 redist and run it locally.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now