Tripredacus

Ah so you have obviously found the nLite sub-forum already!

I personally feel that the only reason to run a 64bit OS is to be able to do things a 32bit OS is not capable of doing. And having additional RAM, is not one of those reasons. IME the only reasons I have had to run 64bit OS is for large volumes and the ability to run 3 sound cards in one computer. But, hey, if you want to play around with it, that's cool too!

A couple of weeks ago, my company implemented a WSUS to send along Windows Updates to all the employee workstations. My computer is one of those rare "false-positive" rogue computers that exists on the domain. By that I mean that I do not log into the domain every day (log in locally), although my domain account has the appropriate rights to join the computer to the domain (which it is). I do not use the Exchange Server (because I use Thunderbird) and have to manually log into the firewall every morning to get out. Prior to this computer being on the domain, it was not even on that network. Instead it used to bridge it and the production network. And this reason was that I not only needed internet access, but this PC also used to be a Domain Controller, WDS and WSUS server for testing. That was a long time ago. I have unpromoted this PC, unauthorized it in DHCP and WDS, and had uninstalled WSUS. The problems seem to stem from the fact that WSUS used to be installed on the computer at one point, and the uninstaller did not remove everything. Our first clue that this was happening was when Updates tried to install a patch for WSUS and it failed. The fact that it did try to install the update means that my computer must still have some WSUS related files on it. I had confirmed that there was no service listed. I had run a tool to do a manual remove (ie a cleaner) on WSUS and it seems to be totally gone now. The only issue is I am still getting errors and some updates fail to install. I am also getting the "At least one service failed to load at startup" message on a reboot. Prior to the corporate WSUS being used, there were no problems with this computer. For those interested, it is Windows Server 2003 Standard x32. Let me start with the Event Viewer, starting with last nights reboot until login. Source: MSSQL$MICROSOFT##SSEE Event ID: 17049 Description: Unable to cycle error log file from 'c:\WINDOWS\SYSMSI\SSEE\MSSQL.2005\MSSQL\LOG\ERRORLOG.5' to 'c:\WINDOWS\SYSMSI\SSEE\MSSQL.2005\MSSQL\LOG\ERRORLOG.6' due to OS error '5(Access is denied.)'. A process outside of SQL Server may be preventing SQL Server from reading the files. As a result, errorlog entries may be lost and it may not be possible to view some SQL Server errorlogs. Make sure no other processes have locked the file with write-only access." The above also occurs to change 0 to 1, 1 to 2, 3 to 4, 4 to 5. Source: MSSQL$MICROSOFT##SSEE Event ID: 17207 Description: FCB::Open: Operating system error 5(Access is denied.) occurred while creating or opening file 'c:\WINDOWS\SYSMSI\SSEE\MSSQL.2005\MSSQL\DATA\master.mdf'. Diagnose and correct the operating system error, and retry the operation. The above also occurs with mastlog.ldf. Source: MSSQL$MICROSOFT##SSEE Event ID: 17204 Description: FCB::Open failed: Could not open file c:\WINDOWS\SYSMSI\SSEE\MSSQL.2005\MSSQL\DATA\master.mdf for file number 1. OS error: 5(Access is denied.). The above also occurs with mastlog.ldf. I am also getting what appears to be a Group Policy or Logon Script error from the domain regarding the inability to update the DST via a CMD. I will not be posting that for obvious reasons. The next one is an update that fails: Source: MsiInstaller Event ID: 10005 Description: Product: Windows Internal Database -- Error 29528. The setup has encountered an unexpected error while Setting Internal Properties. The error is: Fatal error during installation. The following appear in the system log: Source: Windows Update Agent Event ID: 20 Description: Installation Failure: Windows failed to install the following update with error 0x80070643: Security Update for Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2008 (KB948109). Source: DCOM Event ID: 10005 Description: DCOM got error "The service cannot be started, either because it is disabled or because it has no enabled devices associated with it. " attempting to start the service NMIndexingService with arguments "" in order to run the server: {C6A811AB-F8FF-45A4-93E5-FC5CCB650BE7} If anyone has any ideas on these specific errors, let me know. There were no warnings listed and all Infos seemed to be ok.

Either way should work. AutoIT's macros use the WMI objects as well, so its really the same thing as far as that is concerned.

I'm not really sure why some cards are much larger than others, especially sometimes smaller cards are actually better than the bigger ones.

That's a weird option there, the DMI to drive 1... because the DMI is actually in the CMOS so thats pretty confusing to me.

It doesn't matter, post count is meaningless. But connecting to our fellow members via similar tastes previously unknown is worth something!

Take a peek into this thread, it may help you out http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=130564

Good luck on your studies!

It's allright. I remember my growing pains when I went from Windows 98 to XP. What a jump!

Like anything in life, you go with what suits you. If you like the search box, AccessDenied, then that's fine too. Microsoft has made your life easier and that is not something to be ashamed of. We all find things we like and don't like with all programs out there. The people who write these programs (or operating systems) are human also, and we should must be happy that we have this and not something worse! Anyways, its obvious that we all have different opinions on how Vista or Windows 7 works and we just have to live with it. No complaining about it here will make any difference. If you have access to the Partner Channel or to OEM Connect, you can send along your comments, criticisms and bug reports to your account rep. If you don't, but are a part of the official Alpha or Beta programs, you have that option also.

I get this a lot too. My question is, do your computers have access to the time server, or the internet? Mine do not. Of course mine are always about an hour off the BIOS time in most cases. I never knew why that was but I never get any complaints about the time once those computers have access to the time server. If they don't (or you don't know) you will see W32time errors in Event Viewer.

... You'd rather click and open up - and then have to close - an entire new window, instead of just clicking the submenus to make them appear (like most people do with menus anyway)? Hell, I never wait for the menus to come up under the cursor. I click once to make them appear, double click to open a new window when necessary. I'd say that over 90% of the time, I get to what I want much quicker using the menus than having to open a new window and double-click my way through navigation... Access Denied: Using Search for everything is hardly a solution. If the Search box were to be so useful, it should search just the programs list, instead of wasting time pouring all over my goddamn hard drive looking for files I'm not even close to looking for. Hell, the box in the Vista start menu isn't even close to a replacement for Win+R... it doesn't autocomplete paths! If they want to make it useful, it should be more customizable, and have path autocomplete. Simple as that. Besides, I'm not going to be using the search box to start a program I already know the location of anyway... My bad experience only comes from setting the Control Panel to a "fly-out menu." I think the actual term is "Display as a Menu". This was very slow for me. I use XP at home and Server 2003 at work. I have not used the reghack to speed that process up either. I don't mind how Vista or 7 displays programs in the start menu. It takes a little getting used to but us IT guys need to adapt in order to make it in this world, so I can live with that. I also agree that the search is not (for me) a replacement for run. Not everyone knows how to open the run box with the keyboard, even though it is an old command. I use it in Vista, but in Vista I turn off indexing also so the search box is pretty much useless to me. I also miss the advanced search options, but this may be something I do not know how to use. I still use the dos prompt for searches in Vista. But as far as any Vista and Windows 7 differences from 9x, 2k and XP, basically if you have to support it you have to get used to it or if you don't like it then don't even bother.

I am to think, you can use a script that returns the drive letter for a specific volume name. Where a volume named "WinPE_CD" is on drive d: for example. My best bet would be that you could do this with AutoIT. It could be a combination of the following functions: DriveGetDrive() So if you use a CD, you would use DriveGetDrive("cdrom") which would return the drive letters for each of the CD Drives. If a case where there are multiple CD Drives, the next option would come in handy: DriveGetLabel() This lets you check by drive letter. You can check each drive letter returned in the previous function for the specific label that your PE media is using. This will allow you to get the drive letter you are searching for. You may additionally wish to use @ScriptDir macro for any script sitting on that drive that is not in the PE media. Visit: http://www.autoitscript.com/

Oops I forgot about this thread. I had settled on MediaWiki instead of a CMS. After all that work I still don't even update my site anyways. The motivation for me doing it has left me.

I know all about being busy! And about running multiple projects at one time too I bet. Welcome to the MSFN And just so you know in case it ever comes up, your signature images must be within 300x100. This is outlined in rule 5 of the forum rules, which you can find a link to them at the top of the page or in my signature.

Well the decision was made not to use Flash, so I am experimenting with the HTA route. Here is my current setup order: [diskpart] sel disk 0 clean create part pri size=62220 active assign letter=c format fs=ntfs quick create part pri sel part 2 assign letter=d format fs=ntfs quick imagex /apply z:\image.wim 1 c: (the OS partition) imagex /apply z:\image.wim 3 d: (the recovery partition) [diskpart] sel disk 0 sel part 2 att vol set nodefault drive letter mbr 0 /install selm 5 11 "Press F11 for Recovery" 0xC 0x1C mbr 0 1 /h The OS works fine, but again the F11 does not work. I am using the same process as my last attempt so I'm not sure what is so different...

If they are ever made default, I'd change them anyways. I do not like how slow the fly out menu is, and would rather just click on it. Seems to be faster in my experience.

Referencing this thread: http://www.passmark.com/forum/showthread.p...ht=mathematical This error happens when an internal check of the hardware values fails, which in most cases means (as far as RAM or CPU) that the values are modified via overclocking. In my case, this happens during the volume portion. The computer I am testing in (listed as SIXSHOT) has an XP drive in it right now. I copied the files onto that drive (instead of the PE) and it also errors out at the same spot. I will now do a fresh install onto that computer (instead of the dir copy) to see how well that fares. As I had guessed it, the fresh install worked perfectly and did not throw an error. Now I will run a ProcMon on the working and non-working BIT installs and find out what is happening differently. Still stuck... After installing the software, the "copied" version also worked. In the Winpe.wim I moved the BurnInTest folder from x:\windows and into x:\program files. Then made x:\documents and settings\all users\application data\ and copied the PassMark folder (from the XP drive) into there. Rebuild and reboot into the PE for results: Still getting the same error, but now under video card section. I collected the PMLs for the working and non-working versions now and will compare them. By looking at a working one, it appears that BIT goes and tries to read everything from the registry concerning installed devices. This obviously fails in PE since none of the hardware is enumerated in the registry.

You can also take a look at this thread: http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=109264 I also remember there being a custom app that connects to Windows Update and gets everything, but you had to go to another website to get a reference file. I can't remember what that was now.

You can change the options in the Explorer window, . Uncheck hide protected system files. If you do this properly, you will know it because you will then see c:\ProgramData and the Recycler folders. In the cmd, you can use dir /a:sh to view only system+hidden files.

And learn you shall!

Welcome to the MSFN!

I really loved how HL2 looked when I got it. I was certainly surprised. It ran pretty well for me also. I'm sure you'll like it. I didn't like CS too much, too many kids shooting toilets at you. Oh, wait...

Well, since your graphics supports DirectX 9, I'd say upgrade your RAM. If your performance lags, check to see in the BIOS if you can change the memory allocation for the video. And I was going to recommend a Voodoo 3 card... silly me.