mr_flames

I second that motion.

I suggest try to run the Network discovery first before you do any queries. And if you want to deploy the clients, you can do it automatically or manually, there are options and I suggest to do the deployment of the clients through the collection. By the way, what are the majority OS of your clients?

Totally agree though I would suggest that they lower their prices.

Before I used Goto.com and AskJeeves.com and then google came and everything changed. It's GOO-GOUL but some would pronounce it as GOO-GAL. It's really up to you.

I haven't tried Kapersky but I like NAV better than McAfee.

I thought it was just legend but now I'm a believer. lolz

By the way, which is better WSUS or SUS?

Next games to be addicted to. 1. Diablo 3 (Hopefully) 2. Dungeon Siege 2 (Not yet finished with 1) 3. Commandos 3 (Not yet done with 2)

Could you add more details to the issue like what server, clients OS?

Best three for me. 1. Attack of the Clones 2. Return of the Jedi 3. Phantom Menace

Based on experience, I would not suggest to set quotas on Home Drives since you can't be sure that everybody will be using their home drives and there are also some that will be using it big time. My point is, if you have it set, the allocated space for those users who are not using their home drives will just...be there, idle. But if your asking for the possibility of quotas, interminded is correct, not folders but volumes.

Local users (users listed on the PC) by default doesn't have any permissions to add computers to the domain. Only Domain and Enterprise Administrators, Account Operators have permissions to add computers to the domain. Local Administrators are quite different from Domain Administrators in a way that Local Admins can only change settings in the PC alone while Domain Admins can change almost anything in the domain.

I would not recommend giving ordinary users permissions to add just any computer to the domain. It would be a security issue. You first question is quite broad and I agree with chilifrei, be more straight forward on the problem.

There was no error messages telling me that the clients can't download or something. It is just that, since May up to July, the updates that I recently approved mostly were critical were downloaded by the clients. I confirmed this by asking them users and also checking their computer accounts if it is on the OU where the GPO is applied. If you were referring to the fresh installation of the SUS server on the new server, there were no problems at all when I installed it. Although there were some problems with the syncronization of the 2 servers for the list of updates approved, overall there were no big issues on the installation.

When you're giving full or read/write permissions to a file or folder, moving is implicitly included. read only permission is the only type of permission that will not allow movement of the files/folders. I haven't tried the other permissions in the "Advance" permissions. I think it is somewhat like you can't give modify or read/write permissions to a user without giving the user delete permissions. hope this helps.