EliraFriesnan

This is what I get when I search for the whole domain. The site is now completely shadowbanned!

That user is NOT "e3kskoy7wqk", he's not here, at MSFNl he never was! Freaking stop calling him "random string", "dead at the keyboard" or whatever disrepectful tags you call him, as it might be his real tag they generate for the populace in China, as they write in the newspapers.

It doesn't matter. People paid money. They needed to fulfill the period. Titan X from 2015 is supported with Vista, so they must give drivers up to 2025, at least. Ending in 1 year, without telling in advance, is a scammy practice.

Ungoogled, obviously not, hence the name. Standard - yes! After all, it's just a backport adopted to the older OS, without someone's crooked hands getting into the core engine...

How can you compare a much lower Supermium 144 version, aged 6 months, to a much newer 150 version of e3kskoy7wq´s browser?

Where does this info come from? Link, please!

Nothing new! I'd say it's even way more generous than for Vista's support: 2007 - Spring 2016. Less than 9 years.

In the cool browser made by e3kskoy7wqk and @mjd79 "uBlock filters - Ads" is not needed!

In the cool browser made by e3kskoy7wqk and @mjd79 it's not needed! I don't get errors and demands,

Then why it can't load the pages with British Gas, can't log in to Twich, can't even load this poor animal site at all? Whereas other browsers of the same, or even much, much lower versions can?

It's NOT Supermium. It's ANOTHER browser made by e3kskoy7wqk and @mjd79!

It works with XP! Please bother to read the description before posting. Attaching the screengrab in case you're blocked on github, https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7-REWORK/releases

Do you mean Supermium "144"? Why then it can't load the page, if it's indeed 144, and not 109 with a faked version number, like many people think?

Me too!!! The problem actually is inside of the outdated Java engine of the odd, highly outdated browsers he uses. Of course, CloudFlare can easily scan and block those. But some people still want to believe Supermium and the such are "new". There already was a rather detailed explanation by @D.Draker and @mjd79!

Good boy! I too quit a long time ago and buy all offline. CloudFlare can go and screw themselves, don't worry, we shall soon bankrupt them. After all, you and I live in rich countries that make most purchases, I convinced my friends and neighbours to boycott them. Do the SAME!

You like to torture yourself? Why do you stilll use them? I advise you to finally stop using those odd, highly questionable. heavily outdated browsers. There's a good Chinese port (link} of the REAL (Official Build, ungoogled-chromium, unlike Supermium claims to be) for XP and Vista! Proof -

You disappeared, too. What happened?

What's the difference when everything else can be de-selected? I only installed it to try for @NullEntity, so thee may safely move on with your life.

So you trust sites and not the digital stamps of security programmes? Seems odd to me, it's kinda the basics of computer knowledge.

Wrong again, moneypenny (parroting @D.Draker's style) It's from the late Summer of 2011, not 2007! The size is 59.3 mb. And it includes the AV, so he can simply ignore the AV and choose only the firewall, then it will be much, much less.

Good! I think it will work all the way up to 8.0 or even more. But 2.x, c'mon, it's like a honeypot for hackers! I wouldn't advise to the worst enemy!

2.2 is freakishly old for Vista! This one works!

The emphasis is on "reliable", meaning un-reliable in this case. Search Assist no longer considers the information about MSFN "reliable" to generate results. This wasn't the case just recently! Is it now clear for thee?

Still the same. But now Search Assist claims it couldn't even find enough "reliable" information to generate an answer for the search for MSFN!

Aren't they, e-mail addresses, supposed to be completely hidden anyways? Also: decided to try, and not glad at all: @mjd79 sandbox, you here discussed with @D.Draker, is still not fixed. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/1848 With the --no-sandbox YouTube works, but not good. Same for you? https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/1848#issuecomment-4365922684