Milkinis
-
Posts
551 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Donations
0.00 USD
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Milkinis
-
-
13 hours ago, Dixel said:
Better skip that one, and wait for another fix.
As for Supermium+Win7, win32 wrote it has "...widespread reports of freezing and instability on Windows 7".
and by then the version 122 will likely break other things.
https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/page/22/#comment-1259251
1 -
7 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:
360Chrome remains my DEFAULT even on Win10!
I missed out this rebuild 9
1 -
On 1/30/2024 at 7:05 PM, Dixel said:
Everyone, don't worry! @win32will fix the leak! I trust it will happen, I already wrote a new launcher for Supermium.
I have recently hunted the win32 ghost
0 -
5 hours ago, D.Draker said:
Why Vista? I simply like Vista, Why Business? It came preinstalled with my PC. Yes, in France we trouble ourselves with legit Windows versions, probably you didn't know that fact,
Officially, I couldn't - my CPU is in Windows 11 blocklist for being 15 years old. But then again, if I ever upgrade, I'll use the official Ungoogled, not Supermium, there will be no need for it then.
I personally use WinXP because I love it and W7 sucks and my modern hardware is literally getting dust because it has no drivers support for XP
I will just ignore the other stupid argument about --WHY NOT USE W11--
0 -
3 hours ago, Hunterw said:
Uh huh. Well it's not on the first page, so this riddle is not interesting.
ok. you want others to do it for you...enjoy your Firefox 52.
0 -
13 minutes ago, Hunterw said:
EE360 13.5 and Firefox 52.9 won't open the Github asset dropdown - _ -
you are likely to find direct download links if you read the previous posting
0 -
1 hour ago, UCyborg said:
I can have 3 YT tabs open and 3 lighter sites, the computer RAM usage is still below 3 GB, about 2,9 GB, adding GMail brings it to 3,2 GB. 10 extensions active.
you would want to delete these files or replace them with something else with the same file name.
api-ms-win-core-string-l1-1-0.dll
api-ms-win-core-synch -l1-2-0.dll1 -
1 hour ago, UCyborg said:
General browsing is pretty snappy here, but things optimized to use GPU are slow
--disable-gpu-compositing
0 -
1 hour ago, D.Draker said:
P.S. Quoted with author's original broken English.
I fail to understand his meaningless complaint as he's not using WinXP at all.
the download link for the version 117 is still available so why not use it ?
0 -
36 minutes ago, Jody Thornton said:
I'm just thinking out my replacement options for when Firefox ESR 115 bites the dust.
if you can't wait for Superfox you can download this one in the meantime
https://github.com/adeii/supermium-portable/releases/tag/F121
0 -
6 minutes ago, 66cats said:
Didn't know that, but started using Supermium as my main XP/Vista browser.
360chrome didn't left me down and the Google legacy chrome web store is up and running so I won't move over by now...
0 -
29 minutes ago, VistaLover said:
Epic-120 should require at least Win10...
Epic 120 is up to date and one out of the few leftover that still supports W7
https://w.atwiki.jp/chromiumbased/
1 -
5 minutes ago, 66cats said:
Not sure why, but Humming Owl's Kafan Minibrowser was the Chrome port4me
0 -
1 hour ago, 66cats said:
360 Chrome worked for me
that's not a Arctic Foxie build.
0 -
28 minutes ago, Saxon said:
117 in the lead, sad it doesn't work with XP
Epic 120 developed in INDIA scored 64
1 -
SPEEDOMETER 2.0 SCORES
W7 = Supermium 117 = 88
XP = Supermium 121 = 91
XP = chrome M115 = 63
XP = 360 chrome 13.5 = 45
2 -
7 hours ago, 66cats said:
If we're talking about XP, it's the only version of Supermium & is substantially faster than other XP-compatible browsers on decent HW
bench scores aside, I personally don't feel it that faster but it performs better on heavy load web sites for sure
W7 = Supermium 117 = 80
XP = Supermium 121 = 66
XP = chrome M115 = 58
360 chrome 13.5 = won't work
https://www.principledtechnologies.com/benchmarkxprt/webxprt/
1 -
On 1/28/2024 at 9:27 AM, TSNH said:
Why such an extracting nonsense?
Probably to still keep the project open-source and at the same time charge lazy non-tech experienced users for the premium installer on XP.
Not a bad idea actually.
https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/178#issuecomment-1913762383
0 -
11 hours ago, UCyborg said:
Also why is only Google on the built-in search engine list?
what's wrong with this ?
Supermium is not a paid browser unlike the chinese one
https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1254569
I wish Supermium devs could make a profit from the Goooogle search bar to cover their expenses.
0 -
3 hours ago, D.Draker said:
Friend, it's a bit unfair to compare 86 to 121 version, but overall I agree with you, it could be less RAM hungry.
XP will consume more RAM than W7 with the same exact browser.
0 -
3 hours ago, D.Draker said:
Actually, I remember I liked 117 much better for the faster startup.
I use it myself and despite a few occasional glitches I see no reason to switch over unless they enhance some visual aspects I like better
0 -
47 minutes ago, Dixel said:
"Please note that 2 CPU threads and at least 768 MB of RAM is recommended."
dual core CPU and 768 Megabytes ?
30 vs 1 active tabs at a time
0 -
19 hours ago, Dixel said:
I'm more curious about the "script the browser needs to run".
https://forum.ru-board.com/topic.cgi?forum=5&topic=51193&start=364&limit=1&m=1#1
0 -
13 minutes ago, 66cats said:
Speedometer 2.0 is not based on connection speed.
0
Supermium
in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Posted
some tricks allow you to get extensions straight from the chrome webstore but there are far more people using google services than people wanting an ungoogle based web browser.
https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1259253