Milkinis
-
Posts
551 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Donations
0.00 USD
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Milkinis
-
-
3 hours ago, VistaLover said:
PS: I'm dead certain evil Google
will make sure your Ch<88 will become less effective in browsing the web over time, but I feel it'll still be good for the next two years, at least 
next 2 years... this indicates that Supermium 121 browser is likely to reach the next decade 2030
0 -
2 hours ago, VistaLover said:
Save your MV2-type indispensable Chrome extensions while you can...
most if not all of my extensions already have a MV3 type variant or I can easily spot a good alternative.
although I can't tell if ublock MV3 will work over time as well as the MV2 type variant.
0 -
1 hour ago, Destro said:
ok it isn't helpful. Good luck.
if it's a core 2 duo (2007) it should run with no issues but do not expect the same performance as a core 2 quad for a 2024 browser build
--single-process
0 -
3 hours ago, Destro said:
We can't blame the CPU.
what's your CPU ?
1 -
On 11/19/2023 at 11:05 PM, Dixel said:
Simply add this command line flag.
--enable-features=ExtensionManifestV2Availability
It will work for now, when they remove it, no one knows.
is it me or the legacy store is gone for good ?
the ''visit legacy store'' button does not take effect
1 -
On 2/7/2024 at 10:13 PM, UCyborg said:
The only odd XPs I still see in the wild once in the blue moon have Firefox 52 or Chrome 49 at best, so probably not much (any?) web browsing is done on them.
Agreed
0 -
2 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:
My XP was used for nothing OTHER than online!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zao2CUAP3dU
0 -
another A.H.
reddit is full of them unfortunately
DyceFreak- '''most people's XP machines are 99% offline machines'''
https://www.reddit.com/r/windowsxp/comments/1ajcbwu/the_best_browser_that_its_still_usable_in_2024/
0 -
15 minutes ago, Dixel said:
Both! But brightness is something that bothers more.
the dark mode is as much bad for your sight health as switching off your ceilling light bulb #facts
0 -
On 2/5/2024 at 6:15 AM, Dixel said:
Got the same with a Dutch clothes' shop when my ublock prevented some java script from being loaded.
Nobody found a workaround back in the day
so I only check over this site with Win7 or even better my phone
0 -
On 2/5/2024 at 6:13 AM, Dixel said:
--force-dark-mode
this string has no effect on the title bar.
0 -
46 minutes ago, Dixel said:
There you go! Finally someone noticed!
I thought you were disscussing about the fonts rendering. I couldn't notice any ''ugly, thick, red, blurry areals''...
1 -
2 hours ago, Dixel said:
Compare the word "Brave" to "Supermium". Around "Supermium" we can see ugly, thick, red, blurry areals. The word "Brave" looks much cleaner.
definitely you need to pay a visit to the ophthalmologist....
Brave background is a little bit darker, other than this the fonts on either of them are equally blurry but that could be due to the screenshot quality and there's no difference to me brightness wise.
just my 0.2
0 -
-
7 hours ago, Dixel said:
You mean, like this specimen, for example?
I can assure you that Supermium 117 on Win7 x64 can also open 100 tabs at a time without hang-ups.
some picky persons do not even support the browser developement with $ $ $
1 -
On 2/2/2024 at 9:27 PM, Dixel said:
Don't even start
, I can write poems about how win7 sucks, we can go a long off-topic way.
one of the several reasons why I don't like W7 at all....
is there a good file manager out there similar or with the simplicity of the XP built-in one ???
2 -
16 hours ago, Jody Thornton said:
Although 360 does allow tables under the address bar
I couldn't find any visual theme for Supermium 121 akin to this one.
all of the ''classic'' style themes available in the chrome web store look awful to my eyes.
2 -
28 minutes ago, 66cats said:
just about 500 MB (zero extensions).
I removed the user data folder and started from scratch just in case.
1 -
4 minutes ago, 66cats said:
Cuts my memory use in ~half. Actually did a double take -- removed those DLLs from the folder, relaunched Chrome ... memory use doubled. Put them back, it halves again.
I tried this myself on both Supermium 121 1st release and the hot-fix release.
I restared the computer just in case but the memory usage is still the same
1 -
11 minutes ago, 66cats said:
BTW, check out VistaLover's comment -- on 32-bit XP the difference is night & day (for me).
that trick does nothing for me in fact win32 fixed the rebased dll from this link
https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/files/14129613/rebased_dlls.zip
anyway the map issues have nothing to do with RAM usage...
1 -
7 minutes ago, 66cats said:
Different box. This is an x58 with a Westmere Xeon & a pair of 960s in SLI
Xean processors don't fully support hardware acceleration
1 -
44 minutes ago, 66cats said:
Another edit: partial HW acceleration in 7 on this box
https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1259507
2 -
13 minutes ago, 66cats said:
Hi, seems to be working for me (software) in XP x64, will update on 32-bit & Vista in a few mins.
I performed the test on two different computers (AMD quads) and yet it flows better under 360chrome when scrolling, draging the Rover's camera
I didn't try it on Haswell CPU though....
2 -
15 hours ago, 66cats said:
At least you have video encode/decode (watch YT at glorious resolutions) & some semblance of HW WebGL (to watch aquarium, i guess)
this map loads fast enough on 360chrome however it's almost unusable with Supermium 121... can you confirm this ?
https://www.360cities.net/image/mars-panorama-perseverance-rover-martian-solar-day-0965
I don't expect it to run as smooth as it does with Win7 of course
1
Supermium
in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Posted
pagefile should not be disabled regardless the amount of RAM available
I'm not sure what got you thinking otherwise with only 4GB of RAM....