Jump to content

sdt

Member
  • Posts

    61
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Country

    India

Everything posted by sdt

  1. definitely found it much faster than even lightweight linux distros based on debian
  2. i think the difference is cuz of a fresh install vs "mid-january level" system.
  3. the only thing that works for my system is SURT 947821 +3102810 + 3138612 on a fresh install. otherwise no go.
  4. the update 9852. yes! it was still slow. and high memory usage.
  5. yes in my experience ive needed 3102810 at minimum or sometimes a combination of 3138612 947821 and 3102810 didnt work for me.
  6. sdt

    DISM++ 10.1.4.5

    my post is also not carved in stone. it was meant for immediate consumption. the new version is out and is on iscloud.
  7. sdt

    DISM++ 10.1.4.5

    second result in google search.
  8. already given the solution guys. scroll up n read.
  9. yes in my experience ive needed 3102810 at minimum or sometimes a combination of 3138612 947821 and 3102810
  10. sdt

    DISM++ 10.1.4.5

    ok found it online.
  11. sdt

    DISM++ 10.1.4.5

    i cant understand chinese at all. can someone please upload the latest dism++ to googledrive for easier download?
  12. yep. i have a dual boot - xp and win 7 but always use windows xp. the hype of OSes beyond XP is just that hype.
  13. id guess it would be around 800 mhz since the voltage is similar.
  14. @noel thanks for posting the data. I notice the minimum cpu voltage in windows 10 at 1.083V where as it is 0.6 in windows 7. Something is off in that regard. possibly why the temps are being reported higher in win10.
  15. @tripredacus - seems like windows 10 is improving its html5 experience since it is the best of the 3 OSes as far as temps are concerned. overall though win8.1 with chrome and flash seems to be doing the best. its interesting win10 uses win8.1 drivers yet win8.1 doesnt match its html5 experience. PS i didnt suggest windows 10 runs hotter or cooler, i just suggested we test it. thanks for posting those figures @noel youtube doesnt require codecs for 4k videos. wat about using VLC for houkouonchi videos? how does it compare on windows 10 from your testing?
  16. playng a youtube video is a universal thing which 99% of the computers sold will do at some point in their life. So it is expected that hardware/software codecs/drivers/browsers/OS etc would be well optimised for it and if it not then it will show as greater heat output Plus heat reduces life of a machine exponentially. If a machine runs cooler while doing the same task on XYZ OS then it is more efficient. heat measurement in this test should show all efficiencies and inefficiencies combined in a system. Lets get some test results. I would like to see how win10 is doing vs win7.
  17. that laptop looks fine, you could playback a 4k video on a non 4k display as well since the idea is to test the processor heat only. yes my hardware is different but it wont matter because the idea is to see the percentage increase/decrease in temperatures and not the absolute degrees finally. checking system performance this way is the ultimate benchmark because it checks for all system efficiencies and inefficience in one round figure of heat output! if the OS/drivers/programs are becoming more efficient with win10 it will show up as a net percentage decrease in temperature over windows 7 while doing the same task using the same default software on the same hardware compared to windows 10. Otherwise it will show a decrease in efficiency.
  18. You can play this and select the highest setting possible (1080p/1440p/2160p) and note the temperatures in both operating systems.
  19. @triredacus you could download the full video before playing locally if continuous playback over the net (such as streaming via VLC) is an issue due to bandwidth limitations. Either way is ok.
  20. there wont be any backtracking even if win10 fails. maybe a slight modification like windowed metro apps. but essentially they are firm on the path from the looks of it. spartan would be good with stylus integration.
  21. dudes this is a serious question! its pretty easy to check for someone willing to oblige thanks! NoelC this one is for you if you can take it up, since you are the main win10 tester here with oodles of time in your hands. Thanks!
  22. For example hows 10074s processor temps running a 4k video vs windows 7 for around 5 minutes using VLC?
  23. Is this the required log? TestDisk 7.0, Data Recovery Utility, April 2015 Christophe GRENIER <grenier@cgsecurity.org> http://www.cgsecurity.org OS: Windows XP SP3 Compiler: GCC 4.8, Cygwin 1007.34 Compilation date: 2015-04-18T13:01:55 ext2fs lib: 1.42.8, ntfs lib: 10:0:0, reiserfs lib: 0.3.1-rc8, ewf lib: 20120504, curses lib: ncurses 5.9 disk_get_size_win32 IOCTL_DISK_GET_LENGTH_INFO(/dev/sda)=500107862016 disk_get_size_win32 IOCTL_DISK_GET_LENGTH_INFO(/dev/sdb)=3965190144 disk_get_size_win32 IOCTL_DISK_GET_LENGTH_INFO(\\.\PhysicalDrive0)=500107862016 disk_get_size_win32 IOCTL_DISK_GET_LENGTH_INFO(\\.\PhysicalDrive1)=3965190144 disk_get_size_win32 IOCTL_DISK_GET_LENGTH_INFO(\\.\C:)=64877494272 disk_get_size_win32 IOCTL_DISK_GET_LENGTH_INFO(\\.\D:)=42723180544 disk_get_size_win32 IOCTL_DISK_GET_LENGTH_INFO(\\.\E:)=338814828544 disk_get_size_win32 IOCTL_DISK_GET_LENGTH_INFO(\\.\F:)=53689015296 disk_get_size_win32 IOCTL_DISK_GET_LENGTH_INFO(\\.\G:)=2564476928 disk_get_size_win32 IOCTL_DISK_GET_LENGTH_INFO(\\.\H:)=3960995840 Hard disk list Disk /dev/sda - 500 GB / 465 GiB - CHS 60801 255 63, sector size=512 Disk /dev/sdb - 3965 MB / 3781 MiB - CHS 482 255 63, sector size=512 Drive C: - 64 GB / 60 GiB - CHS 7887 255 63, sector size=512 Drive D: - 42 GB / 39 GiB - CHS 5194 255 63, sector size=512 Drive E: - 338 GB / 315 GiB - CHS 41191 255 63, sector size=512 Drive F: - 53 GB / 50 GiB - CHS 6527 255 63, sector size=512 Drive G: - 2564 MB / 2445 MiB - CHS 611 64 32, sector size=2048 Drive H: - 3960 MB / 3777 MiB - CHS 481 255 63, sector size=512 Partition table type (auto): Intel Disk /dev/sda - 500 GB / 465 GiB Partition table type: Intel Analyse Disk /dev/sda - 500 GB / 465 GiB - CHS 60801 255 63 Geometry from i386 MBR: head=255 sector=63 NTFS at 0/32/33 NTFS at 13081/254/62 NTFS at 54274/0/1 NTFS at 7887/211/5 get_geometry_from_list_part_aux head=255 nbr=1 get_geometry_from_list_part_aux head=255 nbr=1 Current partition structure: 1 * HPFS - NTFS 0 32 33 7887 178 35 126713856 2 E extended LBA 7887 178 36 13081 244 27 83445760 3 P HPFS - NTFS 13081 254 62 54273 226 57 661747712 4 P HPFS - NTFS 54274 0 1 60801 80 63 104861358 5 L HPFS - NTFS 7887 211 5 13081 244 27 83443712 search_part() Disk /dev/sda - 500 GB / 465 GiB - CHS 60801 255 63 NTFS at 0/1/1 filesystem size 210146202 sectors_per_cluster 8 mft_lcn 786432 mftmirr_lcn 13134137 clusters_per_mft_record -10 clusters_per_index_record 1 HPFS - NTFS 0 1 1 13080 254 63 210146202 NTFS, blocksize=4096, 107 GB / 100 GiB NTFS at 13081/254/62 filesystem size 661747712 sectors_per_cluster 8 mft_lcn 36872128 mftmirr_lcn 16021955 clusters_per_mft_record -10 clusters_per_index_record 1 HPFS - NTFS 13081 254 62 54273 226 57 661747712 NTFS, blocksize=4096, 338 GB / 315 GiB check_part_i386 failed for partition type 07 HPFS - NTFS 54274 26 25 59519 220 29 84273152 file_pread(4,3,buffer,976773183(60801/81/16)) lseek err Invalid argument file_pread(4,1,buffer,976773183(60801/81/16)) lseek err Invalid argument file_pread(4,8,buffer,976773199(60801/81/32)) lseek err Invalid argument file_pread(4,11,buffer,976773246(60801/82/16)) lseek err Invalid argument file_pread(4,2,buffer,976775168(60801/112/48)) lseek err Invalid argument file_pread(4,1,buffer,976775167(60801/112/47)) lseek err Invalid argument file_pread(4,13,buffer,976775170(60801/112/50)) lseek err Invalid argument file_pread(4,3,buffer,976775183(60801/112/63)) lseek err Invalid argument file_pread(4,3,buffer,976775230(60801/113/47)) lseek err Invalid argument file_pread(4,8,buffer,976775246(60801/113/63)) lseek err Invalid argument file_pread(4,11,buffer,976775293(60801/114/47)) lseek err Invalid argument file_pread(4,2,buffer,976777215(60801/145/16)) lseek err Invalid argument get_geometry_from_list_part_aux head=255 nbr=2 get_geometry_from_list_part_aux head=8 nbr=1 get_geometry_from_list_part_aux head=16 nbr=1 get_geometry_from_list_part_aux head=32 nbr=1 get_geometry_from_list_part_aux head=64 nbr=1 get_geometry_from_list_part_aux head=128 nbr=1 get_geometry_from_list_part_aux head=240 nbr=1 get_geometry_from_list_part_aux head=255 nbr=2 Results * HPFS - NTFS 0 1 1 13080 254 63 210146202 NTFS, blocksize=4096, 107 GB / 100 GiB P HPFS - NTFS 13081 254 62 54273 226 57 661747712 NTFS, blocksize=4096, 338 GB / 315 GiB P HPFS - NTFS 54274 26 25 59519 220 29 84273152 interface_write() 1 * HPFS - NTFS 0 1 1 13080 254 63 210146202 2 P HPFS - NTFS 13081 254 62 54273 226 57 661747712 3 P HPFS - NTFS 54274 26 25 59519 220 29 84273152 simulate write! write_mbr_i386: starting... write_all_log_i386: starting... No extended partition TestDisk exited normally.


×
×
  • Create New...