Jump to content

ElTorqiro

Member
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Country

    Australia

Everything posted by ElTorqiro

  1. Hi mate, I've checked the sfcfiles.dlls that you posted (thanks again!) and have noted that the only one that is getting modified is the one in Step 7. The others remain unmodified compared to a vanilla install. This is useful to know as it means that none of the other tools you used are modifying it in any way, which is good for debugging purposes as we can rule out possible interference from them.
  2. Hi mate, nice work!! One thing to look out for, which can be a silent surprise: the list of files monitored by SFC, WFP and other systems are kept in a file called sfcfiles.dll, which also has the enumeration function getsfcfiles() - the list returned from this function is used by other things than SFC/WFP so the only way to completely fix potential lookups is to edit this list, or the function it calls. I'm guessing SfcFileException() works for SFC & WFP, but does it also modify the list returned by sfcgetfiles() ? Some things like replace-on-next-boot also use the sfcgetfiles() function and won't replace certain files under certain conditions if they are returned in this list. Is SfcFileException() a magic bullet that actually modifies the list returned by sfcgetfiles()? I'm just curious. Again, excellent work finding something that fixes your problem! :)
  3. Thanks for the report, Chad. Which parts of nLite did you make use of? i.e. how did you customise your install?
  4. Thanks heaps, killerb255 - that helps a lot in figuring out where the problem is. Cheers!
  5. @NeoZeruel Thanks again for uploading the file. We're working on seeing why your sfcfiles.dll is being modified when you aren't selecting components for removal, but unfortunately we can't give any ETA. The information you've given us has been very helpful, though, and because of that the problem has a good chance of being solved
  6. You can also just click ignore/cancel since those files it complains about either don't exist in your install, or are modified from their original versions.
  7. @NeoZeruel, Can you please do one last thing and upload your c:\windows\system32\sfcfiles.dll file here? This is the file that contains the list of files that SFC/WFP monitors. It is the file nLite modifies to remove entries that no longer need to be scanned but it looks like yours has somehow reverted to an original version, or that Windows Update has replaced it somehow. If you can upload it here (its only small, about 1.5mb) or send me a PM and I'll give you my email address. Thanks very much!
  8. Ryan; you suggest disabling the webclient service. Can that be done from the services section? thanks, Gary Yes it can be done that way in nLite, or you can do it manually after installation in services.msc
  9. Hi, thanks for posting that list, it really is very helpful in finding out where possible problems are. THANKS!!
  10. Thanks for the update, eddie, the popups in 1.3.5 are expected as SFC hadn't been fixed in that version. Try it with the new 1.4b version to see how you go with that. Regarding the DVD drive, though, I don't have any ideas apart from trying it before you do the Windows Updates. Other things like reseating the cables and stuff I guess are out of scope of the nLite discussion, though, but I hope you can get it working
  11. Thanks... can I also ask you to split this 1.4b/SFC topic into a new thread so I can track it easier? I'm afraid it will end up getting lost in this really long 1.4 announcement thread
  12. Did you use 1.3.5 or the new 1.4b version of nLite? Under the old 1.3.5 one, yeah you will get WFP/SFC popups, you will get some for signing problems (unavoidable, but only about 4 or 5 max) and some for other files such as fp40ext.inf. Some people are reporting some popups with 1.4b, too, but we've yet to track down precisely what they are removing or adding etc, so we may be a while finding what is causing that for them. Still, this won't be related in any way to your DVD burner not working. If you haven't chosen to remove any files or components with nLite and only have XP Pro with SP2 then it will be the same as if you use a non-nLited cd. You certainly shouldn't be getting 26 popups if you haven't selected any components for removal. Check your event log as WFP/SFC puts entries in there for each file it tries to replace so you'll be able to see which files it is complaining about. Also, was the DVD drive working *before* you visited the Windows Update site? That is, did you try it on the first bootup after Windows was installed? If you end up finding it was the burner that was broken, can you let us know anyway as it can then be crossed off my list Thanks!
  13. Hi! When you get the WFP/SFC popup can you please just keep clicking cancel, then once it is not complaining anymore, go into your event log and it will have a list of WFP/SFC entries, one for each file it wanted to restore. If you can list them here that would be a great help. Thanks!
  14. sfc should now only come up asking to restore 4 or 5 files during an sfc /scannow, and these are related to signing, not missing files. Can you tell us during an sfc /scannow how many times you are prompted? Just click cancel each time you are prompted and count them, if you get more than 10 just tell us that. Also, sfc won't be affecting your ability to use your DVD drive. Your only way to test if nLite had any impact on it at all is to install Windows from a non-nLited disc and see if you have the same problem with your DVD drive. I'm guessing in your nLite build you have removed some drivers or something that DVD drives need (?)
  15. Thanks for your hard work testing this out, killerb255. Can you please do one last test, and compare the sfcfiles.dll file from a build you have that does not have WFP popups, with a build that you *do* get the popups in? If I'm reading it right, something must be happening between steps 7 and 8 above, which from your description points to something to do with IE7 or WMP11. I don't use IE7, but apparently it's a big update so maybe it does something to sfcfiles.dll. So If you can save a copy of sfcfiles.dll from step 7, then compare it to an sfcfiles.dll in step 9. sfcfiles.dll is in %systemroot%\system32\sfcfiles.dll Basically I just need to know if the file is identical from both your steps 7 & 9 or if it changes at all.
  16. If you click Cancel (i.e. don't put in the CD), can you please check the event log and list which files it is trying to restore? Thanks. We need to determine if it is the SFC Fix method that is failing, or rather if it is just something simple like a file entry that has not been removed from the fixed SFC list.
  17. Just briefly, I'll second the bit about hardware and drivers etc. I've found in testing game compatibility, some of the more exotic copy protection schemes will fail to install (and thus you can't play your game) unless you have some seemingly completely unrelated stuff still available in Windows. Starforce is a good example. Personally I've found it easier to only go crazy stripping stuff out of an nLite build when I know precisely what apps I will be running on the PC afterwards. This is specifically for things like a HTPC build or in-car build, where I know what apps will be running and in precisely what hardware environment. Not to say don't experiment, that's the beauty of nLite, after all!
  18. Hi jaclaz, thanks for your reply. The code I posted was never intended to be a long term solution, it was just to demonstrate the proof of concept. That's why I refrained from posting binaries. Anyone can then make an app they want to use. Even without the code, the method for removing entries is explained so people can write whatever app they like using any language the are familiar with. So it's not a case of abandoning anything, as I wasn't trying to release an app for people to use, but thanks for the encouragement The main reason I refrained from posting a binary, however, is that my code is hardcoded with locations in the sfcfiles.dll to find the lists of entries, and those are hardcoded locations taken from a vanilla WinXP Pro SP2 x86 version of sfcfiles.dll. There are many versions of Windows out there, but I only have that one. If someone directly took my code or a binary I made from that code and used it on some other form of Windows then it would make a complete mess of their sfcfiles.dll I'm not interested in coding checks for various versions etc into an app, I am relying on people who have a need for this kind of thing being able to adapt the method to their own uses. If anyone is interested but has no coding experience, there are free (and easy) tools for making apps like this, and if you have nLite you already have part of it (the .Net 2.0 redistributable). Then all you need is an IDE like Visual Studio, or if you want a good free one try SharpDevelop. You can also get the .Net 2.0 SDK free from the Microsoft site (search their site for it or google it). I had never used .Net before I wrote my code for this particular problem, and I did that in a day so anyone should be able to pick it up pretty quickly. As I mentioned earlier, if anyone is interested in making an app based on my code, feel free! Just let me know if you want it, no strings attached.
  19. Folks, even though everyone has been polite on this forum, on another forum I've had some headaches from people about the code I posted. So I've removed the code part from my original post. Note that I have left all the other info, so from the concept you should be able to make your own pretty easily. If you want the code I originally posted, please leave me a PM and I'll send it to you, at this stage it seems somehow dangerous to leave it available as people are completely ignoring my warnings and destroying their sfcfiles.dll (without making a backup first) and blaming me. While I don't accept the blame, it seems safer to avoid possible angst and protect people from themselves somewhat. So let me know if you want it. Cheers!
  20. Yeah, the main thing is that instead of emptying out the first letter of the filename with 00, what you do instead is put a \ (plus a 00 to terminate the string) at the start of the entry (not the start of the filename part, the start of the whole entry). e.g. (for unicode I'm using _ to indiate where 00 should be) %_s_y_s_t_e_m_r_o_o_t_%_\_s_y_s_t_e_m_3_2_\_s_t_u_f_f_._d_l_l__ becomes \__y_s_t_e_m_r_o_o_t_%_\_s_y_s_t_e_m_3_2_\_s_t_u_f_f_._d_l_l__ so you basically have a backslash and a 00 terminator, so you are replacing 2 characters at the start of the string. This satisfies the "file exists" part of the sfcgetfiles() but also prevents it binding a directorychangenotification event to the path, and also prevents it silently complaining about not being able to copy files into dllcache. Good luck with it, if you have any questions or want any examples please let me know
  21. It does the backslash option? The nlite-modified sfcfiles.dll I tested from an nLite 1.3.5 build had used the 00 method for the first letter of each filename (not path) for each entry. This does avoid sfc popups for the corrected entries, but it spams the heck out of the event log with "unable to copy to dllcache" information notices when running sfc /scannow. setuperr.log is also full of these notices if SFC is enabled during Windows installation. nLite is also missing some entries that need to be corrected, such as the frontpage extensions you mentioned. Using the \ method at the start of the entry it no longer fills up the event log, and no longer causes any warnings. I don't know enough about the nLite processing to determine if you can inject the \ method into nLite or not But, I have found with my builds the only reliable way to completely satisfy SFC on an nLited install (apart from signature errors on a couple of files like uxtheme.dll and sfcfiles.dll itself, which are unavoidable) is to take a vanilla sfcfiles.dll and process it in my app after Windows installation, then copy this modified sfcfiles.dll over the proper one in system32. This is the only way I can tell to guarantee that the file actually exists or not on the system, and thus whether the entry should be set to \ in sfcfiles.dll. Otherwise, with any nLite build, I get either SFC not working at all, maybe because of a misplaced 00, or getting lots of SFC popups. I know you've said before you never use SFC, but as a test to see what I mean, do an nLite build and just remove a few random things. Leave SFC enabled. Then install the build and try either installing a driver (like plug a USB external drive in or something), or run sfc /scannow and you'll see what I mean. The first will cause a popup, the second will cause a few popups and also a tonne of entries in the event log because of orphaned paths in sfcfiles.dll due to the 00 method. Now try taking a vanilla sfcfiles.dll and modify it using my method, put it in system32 in safe mode, then try the same actions - you'll see no popups for driver installs, and only a couple of popups & entries in the event log for signatures, none at all for missing files or orphaned paths.
  22. A couple of people have PM'd in another forum whinging about not providing a binary etc, and even some saying I was nasty for making only Visual Studio owners able to use it. WTF! Well, I gave my reasons, and I don't think it's prohibitive to make your own from the source code. Since my app has hardcoded entry points for the sfcfiles list text segments ONLY for WinXP Pro SP2 x86, I didn't want people downloading a binary and running it on some other system and thus stuffing their sfcfiles.dll completely. If you understand and still would like to compile it for use on your system, the tools are available for free, and are quite small. 1.> You need .Net 2.0 for this to work. You can get it for free from the MS web site (and presumably a million other places). If you are using nLite, you have this already. 2.> I don't use Visual Studio, I use the free, open source SharpDevelop IDE for writing .Net apps. You can download it from http://sharpdevelop.net/OpenSource/SD/Default.aspx 3.> You don't need the .Net 2.0 SDK but if you plan on developing or debugging .Net apps it helps save some time. You can get it from the MS web site too and SharpDevelop will integrate it into itself. It's about 350mb, though, so if all you want to do is compile my source and maybe tinker a tiny bit, don't bother. This was the first .Net app I wrote, and did it in a couple of hours, so you can tell it's not too hard
  23. Hi, First, since this is my first post in the forums, cheers to nuhi for creating nLite and all the other people who have contributed to the project, even just by offering info here! I've read a heap of the WFP posts on the forums here, and gathered a lot of useful information from it, and from various other places on the web (thanks bitsum, fdv etc). Basically, I wanted to stop WFP/SFC from monitoring those files which were removed during an nLite installation, but still keep WFP monitoring the remainder. Even though I notice nLite tries to do this and rebuilds the sfcfiles.dll during the build process, it doesn't seem to catch all the missing files (in fact it seems to catch very few). Please don't take this as undue criticism, just an observation. Anyway, I discovered that every time I'd try to install a driver etc in Windows after an nLite'd install I'd get the WFP popup asking for the CD. Even after inserting it (or if it was left inserted all the time), no files were actually copied off the disk (presumably because they weren't there - nLite had removed them as requested in my build), the only successful access was for the tag file in the root of the CD. I know this has been brought up many times in the forums, but none of the recommended options or suggesting solutions worked the way I wanted. I know I can use a hacked sfc_os.dll to enable the "no-popup" feature, but I'd rather WFP never even looked for the excluded files in the first place. Doing a bit of research I found a few methods (many of them listed in these forums) for disabling WFP, or filtering the file list in sfcfiles.dll. One of the methods mentioned involves 00'ing out the first byte of any of the Unicode filenames in sfcfiles.dll that I wanted to remove from the list. I found that this disables WFP altogether, with SFC reporting inability to load the relevant RPC server - I gather this is because the sfcgetfiles() expects to find a valid path (or at least one that is searchable by whatever checking function it uses) at the specific location 00'd out in sfcfiles.dll and upon finding an empty string crashes without proper error handling. Either way, it stops WFP working. So, I tried doing it the way nLite seems to currently do it, which is to leave the path behind, but 00 out the first letter of the filename part of the path in sfcfiles.dll. This works a treat, WFP runs properly and excludes those files I want to exclude. However, because paths are left behind, the directory change event that WFP uses to monitor file changes is still bound to the path-without-filename in sfcfiles.dll so it when doing something like an sfc /scannow it spams a gazillion events in the event log complaining about being unable to copy the path into dllcache At least it doesn't make you click Cancel/Yes each time, it just handles the failure it automatically, but it's annoying as it makes a big mess of the event log. So, I tried a lot of different methods and finally came up with one that doesn't seem to have any adverse affects. Instead of 00'ing out the first letter of each entry I want to exlude in sfcfiles.dll I put a \ instead - i.e. because it's unicode I actually write byte[] {(byte)'\\', 0, 0, 0} (i.e. a backslash followed by zero-termination for end of string) This method does two good things - first, whatever function WFP uses to check for the existence of the path succeeds (or at least doesn't crash - maybe it checks for existence of %systemroot%\ when given "\" as a path), but the directory change event binding is never initiated because that function needs a fully qualified path to bind to, it doesn't automatically substitute for current drive so has nothing to bind to - this doesn't make anything crash, though. I confirmed this by checking winlogon's handles pre- and post-my fix and made sure there was no binding made to the root directory Note that you can't put any old character as a substitute at the start of the entry in sfcfiles.dll; as far as I can tell it must be a path that can be checked for existence. If you give a path that doesn't exist, that's ok, but without changing the entry size you'd need to make it a pretty small path, so "\" is perfect. You can't just use something like "-" or " " (a space), though, it needs to be a path or file that can be checked. Actually, you might be able to use a space, as you can make files that are just called " ", but I didn't check that - better to use "\". I know a lot of people have written that using 00 is possible, but I found it just doesn't work for me, it prevents WFP/SFC from working altogether. So, I've now written a console app that will parse a vanilla WinXP Pro x86 SP2 sfcfiles.dll (which I use) will gather the list of files/paths and check if they exist on my system (including ExpandEnvironmentVariables) - if they don't, it replaces the start of the entry with the byte sequence I referred to above '\\',0,0,0 to satisfy the Unicode requirement. I then use ModifyPE (or similar tool as referenced in the forums here) to fix the checksum of sfcfiles.dll. Unfortunately, I then have to reboot in safe mode or use a replace-at-next-boot tool like MoveLatr as provided by bitsum) to replace the file, but that's ok for now. One other thing I've written into my app is the ability to pass it a directory to search for files, in which case it will check that path for each entry in a given sfcfiles.dll, checking either the original filename or the filename.xx_ equivalent. I can thus run it on the i386 directory of an nLite build prior to burning to CD and then I can put my modified makecab'd sfcfiles.dll into the build CD. Not sure how reliable this is as a method since things like leaving the iis component included in your build, but then selecting it for non-installation during the Windows install may mean files aren't actually on your disk, I dunno, haven't tested that. It also can't check through the CABs so it would need to be done before the CABs are recompressed, if nuhi puts this into nLite itself. So, now I have WFP running properly and without the popup appearing every time an app or driver is installed. The only thing I get when doing sfc /scannow is a complaint about syssetup.dll and sfcfiles.dll having bad signatures (so it asks for the CD twice during the sfc /scannow process but cancelling is ok). Occasionally during /scannow it puts an entry in the event log (but doesn't pop up a message) about not being able to copy ntoskrnl.exe or ntkrnlpa.exe into the dllcache but I can't pin down what causes that yet. I never use sfc /scannow in real life anyway so will probably never bother looking into these two. The files are already in dllcache and they get replaced properly if I try to delete/modify/rename either of them. Anyway, despite those two things, I am satisfied my original need was met since the popup when installing drivers no longer appears, and I can still use nLite's remove component function and retain popupless WFP. Hurrah! Sorry for the massive post - if anyone wants the source to my app I've written it in C# and posted it below here (attachment wouldn't work for me for some reason), but from the description above any programmer will be able to knock up something really simple in any language. I did it in C# hoping that nuhi could use the code somehow in nLite itself at some point. It could be done as a runonce thing I think, which is actually safer as then you know 100% if the system has the specified files, but then the app couldn't be in a .NET 2.0 language in case user hasn't got it installed. I'm not going to provide a binary because too many (with respect) noobs may download and use it without understanding what's going on, and I don't want to be blamed if people stuff up their system somehow. REMEMBER - if you use it, don't forget to fix the checksum before putting it into your system! Use modifype.exe or similar to do that manually. If you want to keep the log, pipe the output to a text file (e.g. modsfcfiles sfcfiles.tmp > log.txt) Also use this method (or pipe to nul) if you want to make it run quicker. Without text output it runs in under a second on my machine, but with text output it takes ages due to screen update inefficiency. So modsfcfiles sfcfiles.tmp > nul if you don't want to keep the log or see it in any way


×
×
  • Create New...