leoleo Posted May 10, 2006 Share Posted May 10, 2006 (edited) I love this site and learned a lot of tricks to slipstream WinXP. However, I found that for non-service pack update, the update files won't be embedded directly into windows source cab files. They just copy itself and run at later stage (~87%?) of installation. Is it possible to extract those update files and add directly into the source cab? It can save the installation time and valuable disc space.I am sorry if this problem has been thoroughly discussed before Title edited -- Please, use [TAGS] in your topic's title.--Sonic Edited May 10, 2006 by Sonic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francesco Posted May 10, 2006 Share Posted May 10, 2006 I love this site and learned a lot of tricks to slipstream WinXP. However, I found that for non-service pack update, the update files won't be embedded directly into windows source cab files. They just copy itself and run at later stage (~87%?) of installation. Is it possible to extract those update files and add directly into the source cab? It can save the installation time and valuable disc space.I am sorry if this problem has been thoroughly discussed before nLite can do that job for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonic Posted May 10, 2006 Share Posted May 10, 2006 There is HFSLIP too to just integrate hotfixes ...http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=57659 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francesco Posted May 10, 2006 Share Posted May 10, 2006 Does hfslip leaves the entire updates files inside the windows cd like xpcreate? That takes a lot of space! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zxian Posted May 10, 2006 Share Posted May 10, 2006 Check out RyanVM's pack and the integrator that comes along with it. I've always used this method and it's not much bigger than an unpatched install source (maybe a couple of megs). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leoleo Posted May 11, 2006 Author Share Posted May 11, 2006 Nice! However, I am a SP1 loverAnyone has the Post-SP1 Update Pack for nLite/RyanVM?It seems that HFSLIP will recab the SP/hotfixes.Maybe HFSLIP is my only possible choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zxian Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 There isn't much reason not to use SP2. There's no speed hit once you've disabled the services that you don't want/need, and there's much more security in place compared to SP1.Go with the flow - update to SP2 and use the RyanVM pack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andromeda43 Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 leoleo,What are you wanting to do with this slipstreamed version of windows?SP1 will not be supported by M$ and falls way short of being a secure OS.To repair many problems with SP1 and greatly increase system security, SP2 is a must.Andromeda43 B) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFlash428 Posted May 11, 2006 Share Posted May 11, 2006 I agree...in fact until SP2 I was a big promoter of Win2000. At first SP2 had some issues, but it's pretty much smooth sailing now, and definatly the best OS microsoft has released (IMO). From my experience it is faster and has much less bugs than pre-SP2 installs of Windows XP.SP2 does seem to work the best when integrated with a fresh installation, as opposed to being run as an update though, again, based on my experiences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leoleo Posted May 12, 2006 Author Share Posted May 12, 2006 The improvement of security in SP2 causes problems when using memory patching warez like some loader. Also, I had bad experience with SP2 in the past (I tried slipstreamed WinXP Pro called SuperXP 7.1 and clean old WinXP + webupdate to SP2). It drags down my computer. The security centre just eats up my valuable computer resources and completely useless. It also creates abnormal delay when running apps. Some old apps no longer run and crash. I feel my computer gives better performance, stability and hacking ability when using SP1 + Hotfixes.I don't know if the story has changed. But I think I will keep sticking to SP1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zxian Posted May 13, 2006 Share Posted May 13, 2006 No discussion about warez here. Final warning. You are not supposed to "try a version of XP" that you haven't bought.If you don't like the security centre, then disable it!Like TheFlash said, slipstreaming SP2 will cause the least amount of headaches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DisabledTrucker Posted May 15, 2006 Share Posted May 15, 2006 I wouldn't say "You are not supposed to "try a version of XP" that you haven't bought" as there are trial versions of Windows on Microsoft's own site, so yes you can "try" a version of XP that you haven't bought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zxian Posted May 16, 2006 Share Posted May 16, 2006 AFAIK - there's no "SuperXP" available for download from Microsoft's website. I realize that there are certain trials on the Microsoft Website, but then again, most people don't know about them and I"m guessing close to 99% of downloaded versions of XP are illegitimate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now