hankjrfan00 Posted March 7, 2006 Posted March 7, 2006 This is my first time to setup sata raid and is also my first time to do raid at all in Windows 2000.I got 2 250 gig Seagate Drives and I am trying to set them up to be mirrored. It appears to be setup fines in bios but my problem is within windows. When I go to computer management to set up the partition is it still shows 2 seperate drives instead of the single raid volume. So it appears that it is letting me create a partition on each drive which is not what I want.I am sure that I am doing somthing stupid wrong.Hardware:Motherboard: DFI nF3 250-ALHard Drives: 2x SATA Seagate Barracuda 250gbOS: Windows 2000 ServerAlso what is the max partition size in windows 2000.Thanks
nmX.Memnoch Posted March 7, 2006 Posted March 7, 2006 What RAID controller are you using? Or are you trying to use Windows 2000's built in software RAID (which is not recommended).
ripken204 Posted March 7, 2006 Posted March 7, 2006 max part size i beleive is 137gigsif windows shows 2 drives then you did not setup the raid mirror correctlyu will need to recreate the raid in the bios, then reinstall windowswhen you install windows it should show only 1 drive, if you see 2 then you did something wrong again
hankjrfan00 Posted March 7, 2006 Author Posted March 7, 2006 it should show only 1 drive, if you see 2 then you did something wrong againThat is what I thought. I am trying to set this up post windows install. This is not the volume I wanted windows windows installed on. It will be used only for storage/backup purposes.I deleted the mirrored volume then recreated it and this did not show any difference.Also device manager shows all devices installed correctly.max part size i beleive is 137gigsCan I use a third party program to create a larger partition?Thanks
ripken204 Posted March 7, 2006 Posted March 7, 2006 i think its a windows 2000 problem, unless they fixed it, so no
hankjrfan00 Posted March 16, 2006 Author Posted March 16, 2006 Just an update.All it took to fix it was to upgrade to Service Pack 4. I would have tried it before but I thought that it already had service pack 4.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now