s33m33 Posted June 7, 2004 Posted June 7, 2004 hi guys ..i dont know if you are aware of this but it is a good timesaver if you want to make some changes after creation of your unattended iso.i made a win2kpro cd using XPCREATE. i got it working fine in my first trial. but on my machine it took me 1hr 10mins to create. now the problem arose when i wanted to experiment with my winnt.sif file to remove some components as well. i just did not have the patience to wait another hour.so i tried using MagicISO to overwrite the winnt.sif file inside the iso with my modified one. it worked. the cd is still bootable and it installed perfectly. it sure beats extracting boot images and setting the bootsector to 07C0 and stuff. thanx again GreenMachine for XPCREATE.
Tribble Posted June 7, 2004 Posted June 7, 2004 whats the point of your post? is it to mention out, that you can use MagicISO to edit an iso image? Btw i recommend to use UltraISO, b/c MagicISO sometimes destroys ISO Files. And dont use the build-in-multi-boot-editor from MagicISO. You will get into problems!
s33m33 Posted June 7, 2004 Author Posted June 7, 2004 the point i wanted to stress upon is that using MagicISO to edit the bootable cd is very fast & easy rather than extracting the contents of the iso, making changes and making it bootable again manually(which was how i did it earlier using the bink.nu method). i guess people here already know that & im the last one to find out but now since you mentioned, i will now try out UltraISO.
Alanoll Posted June 7, 2004 Posted June 7, 2004 it takes me a mere 10-12 minutes to make an ISO. I use CDIMAGE to make it, and it doesn't take nearly as long. If it's just a W2k disk without any sort of menu, you should have just used the original bootsector (it's in teh XPCREATE folder, its the same for XP) and just use CDIMAGE. Set the bootsector as the bootsector, and execute and you have a perfectly bootable disk.http://unattended.msfn.org/xp/finish.htm
s33m33 Posted June 7, 2004 Author Posted June 7, 2004 thanx Alanoll .. its nice info.btw .. what i really meant that the whole xpcreate process took me over an hour to finish on my machine. and i had made an error in the winnt.sif file thus, i was relieved when i was able to edit the iso and replace the winnt.sif file without going over the whole process again coming back to the point, it looks like i made a stone age post and everyone seems to know about magiciso and ultraiso .. so mods, kindly remove this topic when it deems fit.thanx all.
GreenMachine Posted June 7, 2004 Posted June 7, 2004 Any XPCREATORS be sure and indicate that they have a bastardized ISO when reporting any bugs ...My box is, at best, average, and I do a complete XPCREATION in about 15 minutes without packing the CAB files (for testing). Final versions take me a half an hour. Debuging corrupt files takes me forever ...
Tribble Posted June 8, 2004 Posted June 8, 2004 yeah GreenMachine, but why remake a whole iso when you just need to edit the existing image (faster and resting hdd ). the problem only is, that there are programs which damage the file after editing :/but you are right that it could be/is annoying when pplz come and say their iso file is f***ed and think its prob of xpcreate for example, when it was their iso image editor for example :/
gosh Posted June 8, 2004 Posted June 8, 2004 I just make a cd from scratch to ensure no files are corrupted. The more programs you use the more variables you have which will result in a higher chance of something going wrong.-gosh
sixpack Posted June 8, 2004 Posted June 8, 2004 i use UltraISO to and made 20 of them not 1 corupt image
Alanoll Posted June 8, 2004 Posted June 8, 2004 I've never edited the ISO directly. Always recreated. Tell it to start, go get a coke, and it's done when I get back.....Just for the love of Peet, don't use WinISO EVER! Or use UltraISO's optimize option as it does it by filenames or some wierd method. I compared the UltraISO and CDIMAGE ISOs, and UltraISO's was smaller, but more files where wrong in the ISO.
s33m33 Posted June 9, 2004 Author Posted June 9, 2004 okie .. i get the hint .. im convinced!all moderators and super members do it the manual way. guess i have to go back to the old ways too if i dont want corrupt images.darn, these magiciso & ultraiso guys market their products so well. they really had me going for a moment.
Alanoll Posted June 9, 2004 Posted June 9, 2004 lol. you can do it anyway you want, but eventually you ISO could get corrupted.
Radimus Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 I just read through the xpcreate.bat and found the command the was used to:create the ISO and burn the ISO and put them in seperate bat filesCDIMAGE -LXPCREATE -YD -N -H -X -OCI -M -D -Bboot\XPCTBOOT.BIN CDROOT XPCREATE.ISOCDBURN.EXE d: XPcreate.ISO -SPEED 16then I make my changes to the files in CDRoot. Once I get them right, I copy the changes back to FilesCD
GreenMachine Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 Looks like you just voided the warranty!XPCREATE uses those switches, it is true, but I think it is the only one ... those switches really prefer 8.3 UPPERCASE file names ...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now