Karla Sleutel
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Karla Sleutel
-
-
18 hours ago, FantasyAcquiesce said:
Okay, is there a modded version of this browser?
What for? It's obsolete, no matter how good it was 2 years ago.
D.Draker no longer recommends this browser due to the age.
2 -
18 hours ago, j7n said:
So it can read memory from Supermium itself right, not crash other programs by writing to their memory? I'd be more worried if it could crash my PC since I run as administrator. Could one really make a gain out of this reliably? Memory addresses change.
Then it's a good idea to use the patched ungoogled for Server 2008 R2. No one knows and no one can guarantee how good and when the old 132 Supermium will (ever?) be patched for that serious vulnerability.
https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7/releases/tag/ungoogled-chromium_138.0.7204.96
Edit/ They say it's been patched in R5.
But in the article they say the patch is for 138+! Contradictory.
3 -
13 hours ago, reboot12 said:
look for before you write senseless posts
His post is neither useless, nor senseless. Learn to look for before you write your senseless posts
It's been confirmed by reputable members of MSFN that those don't work.
"This didn't work for me."
"Edit: After a while (5-8hours) if the PC is not used, the mouse works but I can't open anything that was minimized in the taskbar. I have to restart the PC to get it working again. Did you see this kind of behaviour?
I'm using 32bit XP."
1 -
On 7/6/2025 at 9:00 PM, reboot12 said:
Can you read with understanding? I do not have a dedicated card, both are integrated - one of the Realtek motherboard and the other with the Intel processor and both work
Yes, I can. Then leave only one, what stops you? Never heard of XP using two modern cards all at once in one setup troub;e free.
1 -
17 hours ago, reboot12 said:
These are two completely different sound cards - one is a Realtek 10EC 0887 integrated with the motherboard and the other Intel integrated with the CPU 8086 2882
When one has a dedicated card, the onboard needs to be disabled in BIOS.
0 -
16 hours ago, Mathwiz said:
Version 138 is required for the fix; the bug goes back earlier though
That was clear, but from what they tell, looks like the patch is intended to be applied only to 138+.
Who would write a patch for the old 132, while we are at 140+ already?
2 -
On 7/5/2025 at 10:38 AM, Dave-H said:
Unless someone tells me that CVE-2025-6554 (#1486) is really important, I think I'll pass on this one.
Isn't the minimum requirement chromium 138?
https://www.securityweek.com/chrome-138-update-patches-zero-day-vulnerability/
0 -
brought back manifest v2 extension support. Cool!
https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7/releases/tag/140.0.7275.1
1 -
On 7/4/2025 at 10:03 AM, vinifera said:
"mojave"
It's macOS, not relevant.
0 -
On 7/2/2025 at 6:11 PM, vinifera said:
stupid emoticon
By whose definition? I'm pretty sure they did a research among the testers during the beta.
0 -
On 12/19/2024 at 8:23 PM, jumper said:
Recent History:
- v5.1.1130.129 [2024-06-27]
- v5.1.1130.123 [2024-06-06]
- v5.1.1130.82 [2024-04-16]
- v5.0.1002.354 [2023-05-21]
- ...
I wouldn't worry until next May. v5.2 should be out by then.
Can safely declare official funeral. Mid summer, not even a slightest rumour about the supposed April beta,
@D.Draker's prophecy fulfilled.
1 -
Clear data on exit. The flag doesn't work, cookies are still being left, just discovered.
UPD.
Never mind, started working after several re-launches.
0 -
1
-
Guys, girls thanks all, I'll try to switch off the extensions one by one, cloudflare may not like them.
0 -
Could you help me to run CatsXP, maybe? I could only get up to the 125th version of it.
1 -
11 hours ago, mjd79 said:
may need to upgrade it to 2017 EOL
That I can't do, I need to maintain the gaming performance.
BTW, I had managed to start 137. But not 140. And with the old redirection method, WITHOUT SM files at all.
I don't have any EX kernels extensions installed.
1 -
The site is still blocked on the DNS level in some countries like Canada. Obtained the latest 132 copy from Github. Now I get this.
1 -
On 6/30/2025 at 10:12 AM, mjd79 said:
advapi32 from Supermium 132.
Supermium's advapi misses this api. How do you run it, then?
1 -
22 hours ago, Tripredacus said:
Wasn't there a red screen of death in a Vista beta?
Totally right, interesting observation!
"It was dropped in Beta 1 (Build 5112) of Vista for all errors except boot loader errors. It can also be found (but rarely) in early builds of Windows 98, even when it was known as codename "Memphis", because these early builds have poor/broken ACPI support."
https://www.betaarchive.com/wiki/index.php?title=Windows_crash_screens1 -
On 6/26/2025 at 2:09 PM, Monroe said:
Black Screen of Death error message instead.
But it existed before! It'd be confusing.
1 -
My-my, someone indeed has a strong disdain towards GDPR.
1 -
Then I deleted the Supermium wrapper NdDll, and without it I now see NO missing dependencies, but no start nevertheless.
1 -
Then I saw an old advice from D.Draker and replaced it with just NtOpenKey. Now I get this.
1 -
13 hours ago, mjd79 said:
kernel33 from extended kernel and advapi32, ole32, shell32, user32 wrappers
1
The possibility of running modern Chrome, Brave and Ungoogled on Win Vista 64bit with Manifest V2 using tricks.
in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Posted
So I updated my Vista SP2 x64 to 2016, still no joy.
Chromium for Windows 7 by e3kskoy7wqk starts with the same method! Ideas?
I don't understand what else CatsXP wants, aren't those both made for win 7?