Milkinis

ok. you want others to do it for you...enjoy your Firefox 52.

you are likely to find direct download links if you read the previous posting

you would want to delete these files or replace them with something else with the same file name. api-ms-win-core-string-l1-1-0.dll api-ms-win-core-synch -l1-2-0.dll

--disable-gpu-compositing

I fail to understand his meaningless complaint as he's not using WinXP at all. the download link for the version 117 is still available so why not use it ?

if you can't wait for Superfox you can download this one in the meantime https://github.com/adeii/supermium-portable/releases/tag/F121

360chrome didn't left me down and the Google legacy chrome web store is up and running so I won't move over by now...

Epic 120 is up to date and one out of the few leftover that still supports W7 https://w.atwiki.jp/chromiumbased/

https://msfn.org/board/topic/182876-360-extreme-explorer-modified-version/?do=findComment&comment=1258879

that's not a Arctic Foxie build.

Epic 120 developed in INDIA scored 64 https://epicbrowser.com/thank-you

SPEEDOMETER 2.0 SCORES W7 = Supermium 117 = 88 XP = Supermium 121 = 91 XP = chrome M115 = 63 XP = 360 chrome 13.5 = 45

bench scores aside, I personally don't feel it that faster but it performs better on heavy load web sites for sure W7 = Supermium 117 = 80 XP = Supermium 121 = 66 XP = chrome M115 = 58 360 chrome 13.5 = won't work https://www.principledtechnologies.com/benchmarkxprt/webxprt/

https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/178#issuecomment-1913762383

what's wrong with this ? Supermium is not a paid browser unlike the chinese one https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1254569 I wish Supermium devs could make a profit from the Goooogle search bar to cover their expenses.

XP will consume more RAM than W7 with the same exact browser.

I use it myself and despite a few occasional glitches I see no reason to switch over unless they enhance some visual aspects I like better

dual core CPU and 768 Megabytes ? 30 vs 1 active tabs at a time

https://forum.ru-board.com/topic.cgi?forum=5&topic=51193&start=364&limit=1&m=1#1

https://msfn.org/board/topic/184944-could-web-enviornment-integrity-block-old-operating-systems/page/2/#comment-1250108

I don't use XP x64 aka Server 2003 (NT 5.2) but someone claimed Supermium for XP is twice as much faster. I don't give too much credit to these synthetic speed tests based on netwok connections but can anyone else confirm this ? https://browserbench.org/Speedometer2.0/

why do you use it on XP ? https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/Search.aspx?q=KB942288

100% agreed.

Fixed. I downloaded Supermium portable and created two more folders (bin + chrome) on top of the root folder. https://github.com/adeii/supermium-portable/releases/tag/v121

https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/107