drainer

I seem to have a problem opening MEGA.IO using version 13. After keying in email and password, while the progress indicator is loading the page the browser will crash.

I was an earlier user of the 360 Extreme Explorer, v11 through v13. I also had the DC browser recently installed, and seems to like it a bit better than the 360, due to the theme/skin customization and in my opinion a slightly less cluttered Settings page. What I'd like to know is are all the modified versions of DC and 360 browsers shared here considerably safe for secure pages (online banking, checking emails, to name a few). With the SSL/HTTPS encryption I would be right to assume it should be? (regardless of the telemetry which probably if it isn't stripped off completely, are sending at worst location data, IP addresses, and the likes but not the actual parameters or secure details of the SSL-secured pages we are accessing). As for the telemetry to China aspects, both modified versions of 360 and DC shared here were already stripped off it to a large extent is that correct? I do noticed on the 360EE, in terms of performance, there's always a sort of latency that requires a being-accessed URL to be repeatedly refreshed, especially for websites that are later found to have HTTPS errors and needing a Proceed At Own Risk from us. Upon typing the URL and clicking Enter, it just does't seem to fetch anything and a f5 refresh is needed a few times before it suddenly loads and it just come pouring in or the Proceed page comes. 360 has this latency and it is quite a bit frustrating however for DC i find it slightly better. Is there no way to somehow circumvent this lag?

Tried that, it seems to be a Courier looking font still. Unsure if maybe my XP which is enabled to display Chinse East Asian characters has any conflict with the modification version of 360 EE you have made. Just curious to why do you name the font as Impact#1, but it is actually SimSun OpenType. The one that you recommended to uninstall if theres a conflict, it is SimSum TrueType (TTF). Is your modification scripted to call for Impact#1 file name? or maybe it doesnt matter at all what a font's filename is. I wonder what happens if I remove all SimSun and its variants from my font lib. Another discovery I have noted (unrelated to font) is that in Ver. 12, there's always a CPU spike when the toolbar's download icon (the downward arrow) is clicked to display the popup list of current downloads. CPU spike stops once the popup is closed, but otherwise the spike is indefinite. Thing seems normal on Ver. 13.

The value of FontFamily is a two-character Chinese word. I tried to changed it out to "Tahoma" but it seems like the browser overwrites it back to what is originally there.

I noticed that for v12 and v13 the font on the address bar for URLs and the tab title, it's been some sort of type-writer style font probably Courier or one of its families. While for v9.5 and the vanilla version, the fonts are sort of Arial or whatever Chromium used which seems more polished. Is this a side effect of the modification? Can we get the font to change by some simple edits? Edit: It seems the font also applies all around the UI including the fonts used on the HTTPS cert status when we click on the padlock near the URL. Another question I have is, pressing F3 seems to cycle through tabs. I was used to using F3 to bring up the Find Text function (Crtl + F), and the iteration through all found keywords in traditional Chrome. Can I disable the Cycle Through Tabs invoked by F3?

Just wondering, those of you that use 360 Chrome on XP, do you use it for "high-security" websites like Online Banking sites? Do you worry of any security risks that can happen. As it's been mentioned above, I understand that people are concerned of lots of security things that would have warranted them to stay away from XP, but for the lots of you that are willing to compromise for the efficiency of XP, are you using 360 for critical security websites involving banking? As I have been observing over the years, more and more websites are moving onto Lazy Loading features that are very much unsupported in Chrome versions below 60, with only Chrome 70 onwards having much more stable support for lazy loading scripts. Any websites that implements such features will no longer work properly in old Chromes. So one can only look to 360 and probable a very few others to be able to continue using those sites. Also, there exists a version of 360 Browser downloadable here which is termed Modified. May I know what are the important differences between the Modified and the vanilla version? I suppose the Modified should include quite a number of removal of supposedly spying or privacy related things like sending usage patterns or data back to 360?