D.Draker
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by D.Draker
-
-
On 11/30/2022 at 6:27 AM, FantasyAcquiesce said:
This driver's executable does not work. It states I do not have the system requirements.
Then it must me something wrong with your system. Because win 8.1 must have them by default !
win 8.1 has its native USB3.0 drivers. This is the official statement from Intel.
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000005537/software/chipset-software.html
Windows* 8, Windows* 8.1, and Windows® 10 have a native in-box USB 3.0 or USB 3.1 driver.
Intel isn't releasing a specific Intel® USB 3.0 or USB 3.1 eXtensible Host Controller Driver for Windows 8, 8.1, or 10.
Those I gave you, are only meant to upgrade the existing/native win 8.1 drivers.
1 -
On 11/27/2022 at 9:54 AM, jaclaz said:
Yes, the way "cloning" is used varies a lot, it is a years long debate on how cloning is often used - if not improperly - at least not strictly enough (IMHO), JFYI .
https://msfn.org/board/topic/157634-hard-disk-cloningimaging-from-inside-windows/
jaclaz
Yes, they use it improperly.
On 11/26/2022 at 4:04 PM, jaclaz said:Does WinHex have such a feature?
WinHex can do both ways, it can Clone and image drives.
Source:
"WinHex: A powerful data recovery and forensics tool, by michaeljackman in Microsoft "
May 6, 2003, (notice the article is 20 years old)
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/winhex-a-powerful-data-recovery-and-forensics-tool/
Scroll to
> Clone and image drives.
> Recover data.
1 -
And most importantly, if you will be able to uninstall them , windows will not get its original drivers back automatically .
You will end up having non-working USB ports. Also, when you uninstall them, you'll have to chase and delete each of these manually.
And remove from system32/drivers and delete/restore your registry. Terrible experience.
0 -
Had quite some high hopes for these, yet all in vain. Don't install if you're running anything Haswell, esp B85/Q87 etc.
It *somewhat* works, until you get a terrible BSOD while gaming !
WHEA BSOD 0x00000124 every several hours . The system is slower like 5x times than before.
And with Kabylake didn't work at all. Well, no wonder since it's based on AMD.
0 -
3 hours ago, FantasyAcquiesce said:
Windows 8.1
COMPATIBLE WITH:
Windows 8.1 32 bit
Windows 8.1 64 bit
0 -
I'm very sorry to hear that.
I personally had several conversations with this remarkable man and he seemed very nice and clever.
May he rest in peace.
5 -
20 hours ago, jaclaz said:
In more recent windows a signature collision is detected and the user is warned (and usually the second disk is taken "offline"), on older systems it is changed automatically and silently to a new value, as you cannot have two disks mounted at the same time with the same disk signature, when you remove the original disk, the new disk is not anymore a "clone".
Yes, you're absolutely right ! That's why I remove the original disk from the system before I boot from the cloned one.
I'm pretty sure it was always done like this, no ?
14 hours ago, jaclaz said:The point is about having two exact copies (clones) disks connected at the same time to a same Windows NT based OS.
He didn't write he wanted them "at the same time". He wrote "I've cloned my system disk ... The new drive won't boot."
By his description of the situation, one might assume he removed the old disk.
14 hours ago, jaclaz said:As well from what I read here and there some specialized "cloning tools" have special provisions to change (in the few places where it is hardcoded, namely the Registry DosDevices and the BCD on Vista and later) settings to reflect the newly changed disk signature.
Technically it wouldn't be cloning, especially as if in forensics, like with WinHex. The original question was about cloning.
1 -
4 hours ago, jaclaz said:
Does WinHex have such a feature?
I was thinking of dedicated tools like Acronis. Macrium or similar, WinHex (at least the very old version I used many years ago) is AFAIK a generic (and very good AFAIK) hex/disk editor with some advanced features, didn't thought it had this provision automated, but in any case it would have not worked in j7n's case, since he had the two disks mounted at the same time (to create the third partition).
On older systems you needed a copy of the MBR (or of just the disk signature) and replace it on the (modified) clone through another system (or via DOS or grub4dos, linux bootdisk etc.), on newer systems the clone is - I believe - put offline to safeguard the disk Signature, but if you put it back online on the same system the collision will happen again.
jaclaz
I wouldn't trust russian (acronis) software to clone my disc. Besides, they weren't even in business, they are relatively new.
Macrium are also just too new. 2007 or even younger . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macrium_Reflect
WinHex - yes, it has that feature for a long-long time.
1 -
3 hours ago, jaclaz said:
1 - Commercial tools to "move/upgrade" systems to new disks have mechanism to avoid this collision, but since you did a straight direct copy the disk signature was duplicated.
JFYI, the bootrec /fixmbr will only check and correct the MBR boot code, it won't change or set the Disk Signature, which was needed in this case.
jaclaz
1 - Thist is why my first suggestion was to use WinHex, since it does it without troubles and any unnecessary user interactions.
2 - Thank you jaclaz, you know - I always apreciate your wisdom.
1 -
3 hours ago, msfntor said:
No no, not only, sadly
Then they are of mixed nationality. But why should we (French) care ? I'm just really curious what do you want me to do ? Go there ?
It's their internal affairs. But I agree they need to deal with it before it spilled out . They aren't grateful, indeed.
1 -
On 11/25/2022 at 2:31 AM, j7n said:
It was simpler than I expected.
Solution found, good ! And I was gonna suggest you to rebuild the BCD. Helped me some time ago. Just in case, let it be here.
1. Boot your computer from the Windows system repair disc and then bring up a command prompt as you do in the second method.
2. Then you can type the following commands to rebuild the master boot record (MBR), partition bootsectors, and boot configuration data (BCD) to the startup issue.
bootrec /fixmbr
bootrec /fixboot
bootrec /rebuildbcd
1 -
3 hours ago, msfntor said:
Just in case... you might be thinking about the Germans...the facts are there.
You mean socialazing with them ? I doubt that, I don't even speak German/Frisian/Saxon. And those whom you mentioned, I don't think they are of German nationality.
4 -
On 11/24/2022 at 4:59 PM, XPerceniol said:
But I don't know about those settings for enabled for the flags:
Force Dark Mode for Web Contents
Thank yoy very much my friend ! You're my saviour ! One of these (not sure which exactly, I tried all of them on/off and so on...) .
At one of the launches the glitch went away ,
Yet Jugaarek62 still looks like a werewolf. But let it be this way. So solved , thanks to you !!!!!
3 -
I'm curious will GetThreadErrorMode be available the next time ? Thanks.
2 -
4 hours ago, yoltboy01 said:
I hope they will not break that one too.
They actually might, they read MSFN. I know.
2 -
On 11/25/2022 at 1:32 PM, msfntor said:
"Also I have a short list of countries with whom I can socialize with."
Pro-Putin demonstrations every week in Germany?
Thousands Of Pro Putin Protesters Demonstrate In Germany In 'Parade Of Shame': https://www.unilad.com/news/thousands-of-pro-putin-protesters-rally-in-germany-in-parade-of-shame-20220411
Pro-Russian rally in Germany: https://newsrnd.com/news/2022-03-27-pro-russian-rally-in-germany.rJp7tBAMq.html
Pro-Russia demonstrations in Germany against violence and discrimination against Russian speakers: https://newsrnd.com/news/2022-04-10-pro-russia-demonstrations-in-germany-against-violence-and-discrimination-against-russian-speakers.ryMo-o2lE5.html
So @D.Draker, search for countries without pro-Russia demonstrations maybe?....
Which countries are without pro-Russia demonstrations?
Hi, what does it have to do with me ? I don't live in Germany. Looks like you confused me with someone else.
Here, in Vichy, all is fine.
2 -
3 hours ago, mixit said:
Topic which is 129 pages long with many versions posted, and I'm delirious.
Good night to you too.
On the 1st page version number 13.5.1030.0
1 -
3 hours ago, mixit said:
"the" god knows which build version
It's his version 13.5 from this topic and I wrote the exact coordinates of that crap. Good night.
0 -
12 hours ago, XPerceniol said:
But I don't know about those settings for enabled for the flags:
Force Dark Mode for Web Contents
Yes, this flag makes the white pages dark, yes, this is the one, you're right.
2 -
14 hours ago, msfntor said:
I use Dark Background and Light Text extension. Use it and compare.
But why ? It works this weird way without extensions installed. I only have uBlock 1.4. And then again, why only them are not normal ?
Perhaps their picture format is not decoded properly ?
1 -
12 hours ago, XPerceniol said:
That is what I'm also doing (or just did for you to test as I don't use dark mode normally)
?
Thank you , friend. As I wrote everything's fine on 360 Explorer for me also. The problem started to appear with a newer chrome only.
1 -
On 11/23/2022 at 4:41 PM, j7n said:
Partition 1 24GB: Windows 2008 R2; C: for NT6, B: for NT5
It's server based on Win7, I never cloned win 7 , sorry. And Vista/Server 2008 should have BOOTSECT.BAK on C.
1 -
12 hours ago, j7n said:
but now got demotivated
I'm very sorry to hear it.
0 -
11 hours ago, XPerceniol said:
Do you socialize, D?
OK of you aren't comfortable answering.
When I have a good company, yes ! And only if the people I'm going to socilaze to are not communists. Which is rare nowadays, so the social encounters became less frequent in my life.
Also I have a short list of countries with whom I can socialize with.
2
Future of Chrome on Windows 7
in Web Browsers
Posted
I know.
Yes, deja vu.
I'm having a really hard time imagining someone who would seriously consider using Yadnex, even if they "somehow" let the new chrome work.